1/37
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
what is offender proffiling
Using the charecteristics of the crime nature to work out the charecteristics of the offender
Where did the top down approach originate
USA, by the FBI behavioural science unit
Where did the data to create the top down approach come from
gathered from in depth interviews from 36 sexually motivated serial killers.
Why is it called the top down approach
because the police use the 2 general catorgories to lead to the suspect. from the top down
What are the two catogories
organised and disorganised
What is an organised offenders features
-Evidence that the crime is planned
-Killer has a 'type' they target
-Little evidence of clues left behind
-high iq
-married or socially competent
What is a disorganised offenders features
- Little planning involved, spontaneous
-evidence left behind, body ect.
-low iq
- usually live alone and close to the crime
What are the four stages in working out which catogory the offender fits in to
Data assimilation
Crime scene classification
Crime reconstructor
Profile generation
What is data assimilation
data from the crime scene
What is crime scene classification
Decision if the crime is organised or disorganised
What is crime reconstruction
hypothesis made abt what would of happened at the crime scene
What is profile generation
Rough sketch of criminal, what there social groups and appearence is likely to be
Where was the bottom up approach made
UK by david canter
How did david canter challenge the top down approach, hence why the bottom up approach was created
interviewed 100 american serial killers and found no distinct patterns in behaviours between organised and disorganised killers
What is the bottom up approach based on
profile of the criminal is created through analysing data from specific crime scenes and patterns of behaviour that the offender may show
How does david canter use offender profilling according to the cognitive apporach
Based on the idea that staistical data can be used to make inferences on the schemas or ‘mental maps’ that the criminal may be in and therefore where he may live and work based on the crimes he has committed and where they have been committed
What are the key assumptions of investigative psychology
-Interpersonal coherence
-Significance of time and place
-forensic awareness
What is interpersonal coherence
The way the offender interacts with the victim, if the crime was agressive it can mean they are agressive in everyday life aswell
Significance of time and place
Positioning and timing of crimes gives clues to where the offender may live and work
What is Forensic awareness
interrogating suspects to understand how mindful they seem to be for 'covering their tracks’ and therefore if they may have previously been involved with the police
What is smallest space analysis
A computer program that identifies correlations within patterns of behaviour. Details of these offences can be used to reveal details of the offender
Why is geographic proffiling used
studying the spatial behaviour of the criminal, to identify their knowledge of the local area and from there an investigative psychologist can make inferences about the offendes, home, work, and social activity is
What is a centre of gravity
the area in the middle of where the crimes are committed which can be used to find where the offender lives/works
What is the jeopardy surface
An educated guess of where they think the offender is likely to strike next
What is the circle theory
The idea that the crimes occur in a specific spatial area that can be identified to find the criminal,
What are the two different circles
The marauder, and the commuter
What is the Mararuda
The offenders home is within the geographic of where the crimes are usually committed
What is the commuter
Offender travels to another area to commit their crimes and lives at a different home.
Why is this spatial understanding useful
can help the investigators understand if the crime was planned or more oppurtunistic
What is an example of succesful offender profilling
John duffy, aka the railway rapist. David canters profilling was extremely accurate narrowing down john duffy from 2000 suspects
What is a criticism of the top down approach's origins?
It is unscientific in its development as it was based on self report accounts from sexually motivated serial killers who may lie or overexagerrate due to social desirability or demand charecteristics
Why does the sample bring validity issues
It is small and unrepresentative and therefore can’t be applied to all crimes where they are not murders or sexually motivated
What is a weakness of the top down approach
It is too simplistic , canter found that when analysing serial killers he found that all of their crimes has a element of organisation to them so can’t suggest that criminals can be completely disorganised
What is a strength of the origin of the bottom up approach
It is scientific and uses statistical analysis aswell as psycholgoical theory (schemas). Canter and goodwin found that the circle theory to be accurate as they found 85% of offenders to live in the circles they created.
What is a a strength of the usefulness of the bottom up approach
Can be applied to a wide range of offences such as burglary ect as an offender profile can be made from many cases
Research that contradicts how useful the bottom up approach is in catching the offender in all crimes
Koscis found that only 50% of burglars lived in the circle they had made
What has survey evidence shown about the bottom up approach
Detectives who has used offender proffilling had found that it was useful in 83% of cases but only caught the offender in 3% of cases
What is a main issue to offender profilling, regarding the case of paul britton
That an offender profile can lead to ignoring potential suspects who do not fit in the profile created, ie Paul britton inaccurately profilled stagg in a murder when he was not the criminal, leading to the real criminal murdering again as they had ignored info out of the mental schema they had created