1/21
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Functional Conflict
healthy, constructive disagreement between two or more people
Dysfunctional Conflict
unhealthy, destructive disagreement between two or more people
Structural Factors vs. Personal Factors
Structural Factors: | Personal Factors: |
Specialization | Skills and abilities |
Interdependence | Personalities |
Common resources | Perceptions |
Goal differences | Values and ethics |
Authority relationships | Emotions |
Status inconsistencies | Communication barriers |
Jurisdictional ambiguities | Cultural differences |
Intra- and Inter- Forms of Conflict
Inter-organizational conflict: conflict that occurs between two or more organizations
Inter-group conflict: conflict that occurs between groups or teams in an organization
Intra-group conflict: conflict that occurs within groups or teams
Inter-role conflict: a person’s experience of conflict among the multiple roles in their life
Intra-role conflict: conflict that occurs within a single role
Mechanisms for Responding to Conflict (knee-jerks)
Defense Mechanisms | Compromise Mechanisms | Withdrawal Mechanisms |
Fixation: keeping up something dysfunctional | Compensation: making up for previously negative situations | Flight: flee! Withdrawal: regressing |
Displacement: redirecting conflict in a way that is misplaced | Identification: responding to conflict like others have before us | Conversion: emotional conflict manifest in physical symptoms |
Negativism: pessimism | Rationalization: justifying our actions by making excuses | Fantasy: daydreaming |
Non-Action
doing nothing in hopes that a conflict will disappear
Secrecy
attempting to hide a conflict or issue that has the potential to create conflict
Character Assassination
attempt to label or discredit an opponent
Expanding Resources
get more resources!
Changing Personnel
remove one or both parties
Confronting and Negotiating
distributive or integrative negotiations
Competing
(high assertiveness/low cooperativeness) those who compete are assertive and uncooperative and willing to pressure one’s own concerns at another person’s expense
Collaborating
(high assertiveness and cooperativeness) attempt to work with others to identify a solution that fully satisfies everyone’s concerns
Compromising
(live in the middle of both) find an expedient, mutually acceptable solution that partially satisfies both parties in the conflict while maintaining some assertiveness and cooperativeness
Avoiding
(low in assertiveness and cooperativeness) conflict tend to be unassertive and uncooperative while diplomatically sidestepping an issue or simply withdrawing from a threatening situation
Accommodating
(low assertiveness/ high cooperativeness) the opposite of competing, there is an element of self-sacrifice when accommodating to satisfy the other person
Distributive Bargaining
a negotiation in which the goals of the parties are in conflict and each party seeks to maximize its resources
Integrative Negotiation
a negotiation approach in which the parties’ goals are not seen as mutually exclusive, but the docs is on both sides reaching their objectives
The Negotiation Process
Prepare
Information exchange and validation
Bargain
Conclude
Execute
Interests
needs, desires, concerns, or fears - things one cares about or want - depends on the individual
Rights
may be formalized by law of contract; may be informal, like socially accepted standards of behavior
Power
the ability to influence another person