bac blanc 2 key issues

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/3

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 9:08 PM on 4/7/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

4 Terms

1
New cards

Key issue 1

“I do not believe that Soviet Russia desires war. What they desire is the fruits of war and the indefinite expansion of their power and doctrines.” – Winston Churchill, 5 March 1946


How far do you agree with Winston Churchill that the Soviets are mainly to blame for the origins of the Cold War?

I) USSR Responsibility

→ Expansion in Eastern Europe: Poland, Hungary, Romania: Breaks promises of Yalta Conference

 Iran Crisis (1946)

→ Ideology: natural conflict; Spread of communism seen as threat

→ Kennan’s Long telegram: USSR=suspicious, expansionist, security

II) USA Responsibility

End of isolationism: global power after 1945 → threatens USSR

Containment: Truman Doctrine.

Marshall Plan (1947): “economic imperialism”

Atomic diplomacy: intimidate USSR

 Truman: More aggressive than Roosevelt → tensions

III) Shared Responsibility

→ Power vacuum in Europe

→ Soviet security needs

→  Misperception: defence as aggression (Greek Civil War)

Factors: Churchill’s speech, communist parties

Institutionalisation

2
New cards

Key issue 2 

How important was the Korean War in China’s relations with the rest of the world?

I) Isolation from the West

→ US as principal enemy: leader of “western imperialism”

containment: US 7th Fleet to Taiwan, alliances ANZUS (1951), SEATo (1954)

→Eco containement: allies coordinated embargoes (COCOM, CHINCOM)

→ Japan: US-J security treaty (1951) → war accelerated economic revival

II) Sino-Soviet Relations

→ Leaning to one side: closer to USSR → military support

→ Unequal: USSR fewer casualties, loans → subordinate

→ Atomic ambition: war accelerated atomic ambition, USSr refused to help → beginning of SIno-soviet split

III) Regional Prestige, Military Credibility, and Domestic Shifts

→ Military prestige:  halts UN/US advance → credibility for Bandung

Foreign policy: militarisation, harder towards foreigners, strategic outreach to non-aligned countries

3
New cards

Key issue 5 

How far was the foreign political strategy of France and Great Britain towards totalitarian regimes in the early 1930s misguided?

I) Misguided: encouraged aggression

→ Hitler: TofV, remarmement, Lebensraum, uniting ALL germans

→ Japan: Manchuria ; Italy: ABysinnia

=> Weak repsonses from UK&Fr: Anglo german naval aggr → G rearm

II) Understandable: serious constrainst

→ trauma of WII: public opposed

→ GD: weakened economies, limited military

→ Ideology: comunism and USSR bigger threat

III) Poor judgement + missed opportunities

→ Chamberlain: overestimated capacity to restrain H, see ideology

→ Fr&Uk: failed alliance with SU

=> allwoed G t ogrwo stronger

4
New cards

blabla

blabla