1/3
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Key issue 1
“I do not believe that Soviet Russia desires war. What they desire is the fruits of war and the indefinite expansion of their power and doctrines.” – Winston Churchill, 5 March 1946
How far do you agree with Winston Churchill that the Soviets are mainly to blame for the origins of the Cold War?
I) USSR Responsibility
→ Expansion in Eastern Europe: Poland, Hungary, Romania: Breaks promises of Yalta Conference
→ Iran Crisis (1946)
→ Ideology: natural conflict; Spread of communism seen as threat
→ Kennan’s Long telegram: USSR=suspicious, expansionist, security
II) USA Responsibility
→ End of isolationism: global power after 1945 → threatens USSR
→ Containment: Truman Doctrine.
→ Marshall Plan (1947): “economic imperialism”
→ Atomic diplomacy: intimidate USSR
→ Truman: More aggressive than Roosevelt → tensions
III) Shared Responsibility
→ Power vacuum in Europe
→ Soviet security needs
→ Misperception: defence as aggression (Greek Civil War)
→ Factors: Churchill’s speech, communist parties
→ Institutionalisation
Key issue 2
How important was the Korean War in China’s relations with the rest of the world?
I) Isolation from the West
→ US as principal enemy: leader of “western imperialism”
→ containment: US 7th Fleet to Taiwan, alliances ANZUS (1951), SEATo (1954)
→Eco containement: allies coordinated embargoes (COCOM, CHINCOM)
→ Japan: US-J security treaty (1951) → war accelerated economic revival
II) Sino-Soviet Relations
→ Leaning to one side: closer to USSR → military support
→ Unequal: USSR fewer casualties, loans → subordinate
→ Atomic ambition: war accelerated atomic ambition, USSr refused to help → beginning of SIno-soviet split
III) Regional Prestige, Military Credibility, and Domestic Shifts
→ Military prestige: halts UN/US advance → credibility for Bandung
→ Foreign policy: militarisation, harder towards foreigners, strategic outreach to non-aligned countries
→
Key issue 5
How far was the foreign political strategy of France and Great Britain towards totalitarian regimes in the early 1930s misguided?
I) Misguided: encouraged aggression
→ Hitler: TofV, remarmement, Lebensraum, uniting ALL germans
→ Japan: Manchuria ; Italy: ABysinnia
=> Weak repsonses from UK&Fr: Anglo german naval aggr → G rearm
II) Understandable: serious constrainst
→ trauma of WII: public opposed
→ GD: weakened economies, limited military
→ Ideology: comunism and USSR bigger threat
III) Poor judgement + missed opportunities
→ Chamberlain: overestimated capacity to restrain H, see ideology
→ Fr&Uk: failed alliance with SU
=> allwoed G t ogrwo stronger
blabla
blabla