Material deprivation

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/5

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

/

Last updated 7:31 AM on 6/3/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

6 Terms

1
New cards

What evidence links poverty to underachievement?

  • Department for Education (2012):

    • only ~1/3 of FSM pupils achieve 5 good GCSEs

    • compared to ~2/3 of others

  • Poor pupils are more likely to:

    • truant or be excluded

    • leave school with no qualifications

  • ~90% of failing schools are in deprived areas

2
New cards

How does poor housing directly affect achievement?

  • Overcrowding:

    • no quiet place to study

    • disturbed sleep

  • Lack of space:

    • limits homework and learning activities

  • Temporary housing:

    • frequent moves → disrupted schooling

→ Leads to lower attainment.

3
New cards

How does poor housing indirectly affect education?

  • Damp/cold housing → ill health

  • overcrowding → higher accident risk

  • temporary housing → stress and instability

These cause:

  • absences from school

  • reduced concentration and performance

4
New cards

How does poverty affect behaviour according to Wilkinson and Bladen & Machin? ?

  • Wilkinson (1996):

    • poorer children more likely to have:

      • hyperactivity

      • anxiety

      • behavioural issues

  • Blanden and Machin (2007):

    • more externalising behaviour (e.g. fighting)

These disrupt:

  • learning

  • teacher relationships

  • overall achievement

5
New cards

What are the “costs of free schooling”?

Ball argues education isn’t truly free.

Costs include:

  • uniforms

  • transport

  • books and equipment

  • trips and activities

Poor families may struggle to afford these → disadvantage.

6
New cards

What is the evaluation of material deprivation?

Strengths:

  • strong statistical evidence

  • clearly shows impact of poverty

Weaknesses:

  • doesn’t explain why some poor pupils succeed

  • ignores cultural and in-school factors