1/22
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
many civil law jurisdictions, dual mandate is separated into
two boards
common law vs civil law: common law
shareholder centric
provide more legal protections for minority shareholders
Stock markets have higher valuations
common law vs civil law: civil law
stakeholder centric
more legal protections for employees and society
there's lower unemployment and wage disparity in some civil law jurisdictions
civil jurisdictions, companies often need to turn to alternative funding sources (banks, wealthy families)
germany: supervisory board
Monitors corporation (approves financials, decides if dividends will be paid out)
Appoints, supervises, and can dismiss management board
No executives allowed
Must include labour representation (1/3 to ½ depending on how large firm is)
Can cap CEO pay (ex: Volkswagen capped pay at 10 million Euros)
germany: management board
Makes operational and strategic decisions
Executives, managers
china: board of supervisors
Monitors directors and management
Reviews finances, regulatory/legal compliance
Must have 1/3 employee representation
Often has governmental actors
china: board of directors
Responsible for overseeing strategic management of company
Appoints the managers
Role of the Chair
leader of board
• Set the agenda and work plan
• Preside over the meeting, manages meeting efficiency
• Ensures directors are informed/properly briefed
• Counsels individual directors
• Link person between committee heads and board, board and management
• Examples: When Tim Cook steps down in fall 2026, he will become chair and John Ternus will step into role of CEO
Pros to Having Separation of CEO and Chair
Clear separation of responsibility
• Gives CEO more time to focus on strategy
• Gives the board more objectivity, independence, better oversight
• Good when a company has a new CEO
Cons to Having Separation of CEO and Chair
• Creates duplication in leadership
• Slower decision making
• Can lead to inefficiency
• Blurred authority
• Can lead to personality conflicts (Iger/Chapek at Disney)
alternative having separation of CEO and Chair
Lead independent director
responsibilities of Lead independent director
Coordinate meetings of the independent directors
• Act as point person between independent directors and the CEO
• Can be a contact person for shareholders
• Examples: NVIDA, Starbucks, Goldman Sachs, Blackrock all have lead independent directors
how are directors chosen
• Nominated by the Board of Directors
• Voted on by the shareholders at annual shareholder meeting
what does apple allow for
proxy access: The right for some shareholders to nominate directors
if there is a proxy challenge, what happens?
the elections becomes contested
they would do regular voting
directors with the most votes gets elected
have there been recent proxy challenges at apple?
no
Why might a proxy challenge happen?
hostile takeover attempt - hostile firm may attempt to replace the board
activist management - activist investor dissatisfied with the firm's performance may put forward a small group of directors where they can participate in the management of the firm
how can you block a hostile takeover
poison pill
poison pill
By allowing shareholders (excluding the hostile bidder) to purchase additional shares at a steep discount once a threshold (e.g., 20%) is crossed, it severely dilutes the acquirer's stake, making the takeover prohibitively expensive
how can you avoid a firm takeover via proxy battle?
use a staggered board
each year, only 1/3 seats are up for election
if there are 9 seats, it would take take 2 years to have majority position
audit committee
Independence Requirement: Must be 100% independent in the US and Canada
Monitor choice of accounting principles
Hire and oversee external audit; oversee internal audit
Oversee regulatory compliance and monitor risk
All must be financially literate; one must be a financial expert; min. 3 directors
Compensation Committee
Independence Requirement: Must be 100% independent in the US, recommend independent in Canada
Set the CEO's and directors' compensation
Set performance-related goals and monitor CEO performance relative to goals
Hire compensation consultants
Advise CEO on executive pay
nominating committee
Independence Requirement: Must be 100% independent in the US, recommend independent in Canada
Identify, evaluate, nominate directors
Hire external consultants to identify nominees
Manage CEO and directors evaluation process
May be responsible for CEO succession planning
Though some leave this to the whole board or may even have a succession planning committee