1/33
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Ethical Frameworks
Utilitarianism
Kantianism
Justice & Fairness
Rights
Virtue Ethics
Utilitarianism
which option produces the best total outcome? making decisions based on consequences, choosing an action that generates the greatest amount of good for the greatest number of people
Utilitariansim Challenges
hard to quantify satisfaction, limited knowledge, hard to predict outcomes, ignores rights/justice
Kantianism
could i will this as a universal rule + am I respecting autonomy? making decisions based on rules and duties as opposed to consequences, human beings are rational, respect autonomy, first and second formulations
Kantianism - First Formulation
universalbility vs reversibility, what if everyone did that vs acts how you want to be treated
Kantianism - Second Formulation
humanity / treating as ends not means, am I using a person to better myself or respecting their autonomy?
Kantianism Challenges
sets a very high standard that may be difficult to follow, duty above everything (happiness, well being)
Justice & Fairness
is the distribution/process fair? making decisions based on comparative treatment to members of a group, benefits/burdens are equally distributed
Justice & Fairness Challenges
conflicting duties, limited scope, strictly following rules can skew decision making
Rights
does this violate anyone’s rights? making decisions baed on fundamental rights (human/legal) as constraints on what we’re allowed to do, even if violating them would increase total welfare
Rights Challenges
different rights can conflict, hard to agree on all ethics based rights
Virtue Ethics
what does this choice say about my character and what habits it builds? making decisions based on core virtues, i.e., who that person is compared to what they should do, focuses on habit/character over time
Types of Virtues
honesty, courage, fairness, integrity, compassion, responsibility, prudence
Virtue Ethics Challenges
how to make sense of good people doing bad things, what to do when virtues conflict, lack of agreement on universal virtues/guidelines
Five Business Myths (Trevino & Brown)
Myth #1 - It’s easy to be ethical
Myth #2 - unethical behaviour in business is simply the result of bad apples
Myth #3 - ethics can be managed through formal ethics codes and programs
Myth #4 - ethical leadership is mostly about leader integrity
Myth #5 - People are less ethical than they used to be
Myth #1 - It’s Easy to be Ethical
ethical decision making is a complex multi-stage process, decision makers may not recognize that they are facing an ethical issue, process: moral awareness, judgement, motivation, character
Myth #2 - Unethical Behaviour in Business is Simply the Result of Bad Apples
ethical/unethical behaviour is influenced by individual characteristics and contextual factors, culture is an important contextual factor, corrupt sub units + social cocoons exist
Myth #3 - Ethics can be Managed through Formal Ethics Codes and Programs
corporate culture (sets expectations and norms) vs ethical cultures (employees understanding of the culture in relation to ethics)
Myth #4 - Ethical Leadership is mostly about Leader Integrity
distinguishing between the effective leader and the ethical effective leader, ethical leadership embodies utilitarianism (greater good) and deontological frameworks (how they do so)
Consequences of Organizational Dishonesty - Cialdini
Malignancy #1 - reputation degradation
Malignancy #2 - mis(matches) between values of employee and organization
Malignancy #3 - increased surveillance
Characteristics of Ethical Business Cultures
long-term perspective: long term stakeholder goals over short term
stakeholder balance: involve all stakeholders in decisions
leadership effectiveness: leaders at every level demand and role model ethical conduct
process integrity: mission/values are integrated into the organization
Shareholder Theory Author
Milton Friedman
Stakeholder Theory Author
Ed Freeman
Shareholder Theory
the social responsibility of business is to pursue max profit while engaging in open and free competition within the law and without deception or fraud, businesses cannot have responsibilities, people do (duty to the people who own the business), managers of a publicity traded company are agent of principal (shareholder), the shareholders want maximum profit
Stakeholder Theory
focus on value creation, away from profits, stakeholders interests are joint, the primary responsibility of the executive is to create as much value as possible for stakeholders (more common today)