1/34
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Departmental Teams
consist of employees who have similar or complementary skills and are located in the same unit of a functional structure; usually minimal task intdependence.
Team Permanence: High
Skill Diversity: low to medium
Authority Dispersion: Low
Self-directed Teams
members are organized around work processes that complete an entire piece of work requiring several interdependent tasks and have.
Team Permanence: High
Skill Diversity: Medium to High
Authority Dispersion: high
Task Forces/ Project Teams
Cross-functional teams whose members are usually drawn from several disciplines to solve a specific problem, realize an opportunity, or design a product or service.
Team Permanence: High
Skill Diversity: Medium to High
Authority Dispersion: Medium
Advantages of Teams
-Better Decisions and Products
-Better information sharing and coordination
-Higher motivation due to team membership
Challenges of Teams
some tasks are better done individually
process losses: resources expended toward team development and maintenance rather than the task
social loafing
Social Loafing
The tendency for individuals to expend less effort when working collectively than when working individually
When Social Loafing Occurs
when individual performance is hidden, indistinguishable
work has low motivation
due to individual characteristics
when employees lack motivation to help team goals
How to minimize social loafing
forms smaller teams
measure individual performance
specialize tasks
increase job enrichment
increase mindfulness of team obligations
select motivated, team-oriented employees
Team Development Stages
Forming: Uncertainty and Anxiety
Storming: Intra-group conflict
Norming: close relationships and cohesiveness
Performing: when the group is fully functional
Adjourning: concern with wrapping up activities rather than task performance for temporary groups
Synchronicity
channel requires/allows sender and receiver to transmit at the same time (synchronous) or at different times (asynchronous).
Depends on:
Time urgency
Complexity of the topic
cost of synchronous communication
whether receiver should have time to reflect
Media Richness
The channel’s data-carrying capacity- volume and variety of information that can be transmitted during a specific time .
Used when:
Conveys multiple cues
Allows timely feedback
Allows customized message
Permits complex symbols
Task- Oriented Behaviours
Assign work, clarify
Set goals and deadlines, provide feedback
establish work procedures, plan future work
People-Oriented Behaviours
concerns for employee needs
make workplace pleasant
recognize employee contributions
listen to employees
Servant Leadership
leaders serve followers and help employees fulfill their needs and are coaches, stewards, and facilitators of employee performance.
Characteristics:
Natural calling to serve others
Humble and accepting relationships
Ethical Decisions and actions
Leadership Attributes Perspective Limitations
Assumes a universal approach with different attributes that may be equally good.
views leadership within person- whereas leadership is relational
link between attributes and effective leadership is muddied by implicit leadership
Attributes indicate only leadership potential, not performance.
Merging Organizational Cultures
Assimilation: acquired firm embraces acquiring culture
Deculturation: Acquiring firm imposes its culture and practices
Integration: Composite culture preserves best of past cultures
Separation: Merged firms keep their own corporate cultures and practices
Attraction-Selection-Attrition Theory
Organizations have a natural tendency to hire people who have similar values and characteristics to obtain a stronger culture.
Attraction: Applicants self-select based on compatibility
Selection: Firms select applicants based on compatible values
Attrition: Employees with incompatible values quit or are fired.
Horizontally-Oriented Structure
Contemporary structure, built for learning/adaptability, decentralized decision making
Horizontal Information Linkages
facilitate the exchange of information across departments (shared network drives, google docs)
Full-Time Integrator: Horizontal Information Linkages
does not belong to one of the functional groups they’re coordinating
coordinates several departments
often given title of “project manager”
have well-developed people skills, because they have the job of bringing departments together and resolve conflicts!
Teams: Horizontal Information Linkages
strongest horizontal linkage mechanism
permanent task forces, includes a full-time integrator
Cross-Functional teams and virtual teams
Matrix Structure
A mix between either product and function or product and geographical structures
product and functional managers have equal authority (employees report to both)
A strong form of horizontal linkage
Required Conditions for Matrix
1) Pressure exists to share scarce resources across product lines
2) environmental pressure exists for two or more critical outputs, such as in-depth technical knowledge and frequent new products
3) the environmental domain of the organization is both complex and unstable
Functional Matrix
functional managers have the power, product managers act as coordinators
Product Matrix
product/project/brand managers have the power, functional managers work on division of labour, provide expert advice
Symptoms of Structural Deficiency
Decision making is delayed or lacking in quality
the organization does not respond innovatively to a changing environment
employee performance declines and goals are not being met
Too much conflict is evident
Lewin’s Change Model
Unfreeze: understanding the current situation and breaking it down
Change: changes are implemented
Refreeze: once the changes have been implemented, solidify them
Sources of Personal Power
legitimate: formal authority
reward: ability to bestow rewards
coercive: punish/reccomend punishment
expert: special skills/knowledge
referent: resources/personal traits
Organizational Power
Stems from structural elements that provide individuals with power
Horizontal Sources of Power
Harder to measure because they are not defined by a hierarchy
ex) VP’s being on the same level of the hierarchy but not having the same amount of power.
Sources of Conflict
Incompatible goals
differentiation
Interdependence
Scarce Resources
Ambiguous Rules
Poor Communication
Manifest Conflict
Conflict Handling Style
Decisions
Overt Behaviours
Conflict Outcomes
Positive:
Better Decisions
Responsive Organization
Team Cohesion
Negative:
Stress/low morale
Turnover
Politics
Lower Performance
Distorted Information
Types of Third Party Intervention
Inquisation, Mediation, Arbitration
Manage Concessions
Communicate priorities and motivation. Successful negotiators can:
clearly label each concession as a concession
state the other party should reciprocate
make fewer and smaller concessions