econ exam 2

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/66

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

problem set and poll everywhere questions

Last updated 8:06 PM on 4/15/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

67 Terms

1
New cards

What is the Solor Model Golden Rule Condition?

MPK − δ = n

(marginal product of capital - depreciation rate = labor force growth rate)

2
New cards

what if MPK − δ > n

  • Capital is very productive

  • you should increase the savings rate

3
New cards

what if MPK − δ = n

  • you are at the optimum

  • consumption per person is maximized

4
New cards

what if MPK − δ < n

  • Capital is not productive enough

  • you should decrease the savings rate

5
New cards

How do the Solow growth model and the endogenous growth model view the marginal product of capital?

The Solow model assumes diminishing returns, and the endogenous growth model assumes constant returns to capital.

6
New cards

What is the key equation of growth accounting?

∆Y/Y = α∆K/K + (1 − α)∆L/L + ∆A/A

OR

GDP growth rate = share of income to capital*(capital growth rate) - share of income to labor(labor growth rate) + technology growth rate

7
New cards

names for ∆A/A

  • solow residual

  • the change in output not explained by the change in inputs

  • change in output measured indirectly

8
New cards

If the net marginal return to capital (MPK − δ) is above the economy’s average growth rate (n +g )…

there is an opportunity to increase future consumption per capita

9
New cards

A comparison of these two countries most clearly demonstrates the importance of institutions to economic development.

North Korea and South Korea

10
New cards

A static decision is one that…

involves planing over one time period

11
New cards

it is useful to assum that there is a single representative consumer because…

this is a useful abstraction if we are interested in problems where distribution effects are not important.

12
New cards

a utility function

needs to measure relative amounts of happiness for a single individual

13
New cards

why do we use indifference curves?

they help represent preferences

14
New cards

what is a numeraire?

a good used as a unit of account

15
New cards

A consumer’s real disposable income equals

wage income plus profit income minus taxes

(wxL) + π dividends - T

16
New cards

With consumption on the vertical axis and leisure on the horizontal axis, the slope of the budget line is equal to

-w

17
New cards

If dividend income increases…

  • the consumer chooses to consume more leisure. 

  • the consumer chooses to consume more consumption goods. 

  • the budget constraint shifts to the right.

18
New cards

The household budget constraint may have a kink because

leisure is limited by the number of available hours

19
New cards

theoretically, an increase in the real wage

has an ambiguous effect on leisure

20
New cards

In an economic model, an endogenous variable is…

determined by the model itself

(endogenous - inside the model)

21
New cards

relationships in the one period model:

  • G=T 

  • Y=C+G 

  • Y=zF(K,N)

22
New cards

In the one-period competitive model we have been studying…

consumption is endogenous, and total factor productivity is exogenous

23
New cards

The PPF determines…

the set of feasible outcomes

24
New cards

A competitive equilibrium 

is economically efficient only given some special conditions

25
New cards

conditions for competitive equilibrium:

  • Households optimize (work vs leisure)

  • Firms optimize (w = MPL , r = MPK)

  • Markets clear (L supply = L demand , Y=C+I+G, savings = investment)

26
New cards

Why may a competitive equilibrium fail to be Pareto optimal?

  • externalities. 

  • distorting taxes. 

  • non-price-taking firms (imperfect competition)

  • incomplete markets

27
New cards

Does inequality prevent competitive equilibriums from being pareto optimal?

No

  • Pareto optimal can’t make someone better off while making someone worse off; inequality itself doesn’t necessarily make someone worse off

28
New cards

An increase in government spending shifts the PPF

downward, but does not change its slope

29
New cards

 Real business cycle theory argues that the primary cause of business cycles is fluctuations in

total factor productivity

30
New cards

At the competitive equilibrium with a positive proportional labor income tax

 the real wage after tax is lower than the marginal product of labor

31
New cards

When the tax rate increases, the tax revenue

  • may increase or decrease depending on what side of the laffer curve it is on

32
New cards

in the solow growth model, which variable is endogenous?

  • the capital stock

33
New cards

Solow growth equation

Δk= sf(k) − (n+δ)k

34
New cards

In the Solow model, which two variables have similar effects on the capital stock per worker?

  • the savings rate and depreciation rate

35
New cards

if population grows at rate n and workers become more effective at rate g, which variable grows at rate (n+g)?

  • output

    • Y=A⋅F(K,L)

    • Depends on both A andL

    • In general growth:

      • Y grows at n+g  (plus capital accumulation effects in transition)

36
New cards

What might Joseph Schumpteter have called the rise of online retailing at the expense of brick-and mortar retail outlets?

  • creative destruction

37
New cards

Which statement is suorted by research?

Nations with high levels of physical and human capital tend to use those factors more efficiently

38
New cards

what would NOT change the total factor productivity?

  • an increase in capital, labor, or both

    • adding more inputs increases output, but TFP specifically measures efficiency independent of input quantities

39
New cards

what is a possible explanation of the productivity slowdown in the 1970s?

  • worker quality declined

    • large Baby Boomer generation entered the labor force, bringing many inexperienced workers that temporarily dragged down average productivity

40
New cards

the utility function captures:

How an individual consumer ranks consumption bundles

41
New cards

the fact that indifference curves are downward sloping…

follows the fact that more is preferred to less

42
New cards

the real wage denotes…

The number of units of consumption goods that can be exchanged for one unit of labor time

43
New cards

a positive, pure income effect can be obtained by:

Increasing the dividend.

  • A pure income effect means the consumer's purchasing power changes without any change in relative prices (i.e., the real wage stays the same, so the budget constraint shifts parallel).

  • In the static macro model (ECON304), the consumer's budget constraint is;

    • C = w(h - l) + π - T

44
New cards

the substitution effect measures:

The responses of quantities to changes in the relative prices of goods.

45
New cards

a production function describes the:

  • Technological possibilities for converting factor inputs into outputs

  • Production function

    • Y = zF(K, N)

46
New cards

the assumption that the marginal product of labor decreases as the labor input increases implies…

  • The production function is concave.

    • the marginal product of labor (MPN) is the slope of the production function. If MPN is decreasing as labor increases, that means the slope is getting flatter and flatter as you move right — which is precisely the definition of a concave function

47
New cards

when the representative firm maximizes profits…

The marginal product of labor equals the wage

  • π = zF(K, N) − wN

  • MPN = w

48
New cards

a competitive equilibrium is a state of affairs in which…

  • markets clear and economic agents are price takers

49
New cards

in a competitve equilibrium, which relationships are true?

  • labor demand = labor supply

    • labor clearing

  • Y = G + C

    • goods market clearing

    • output = gov. spending + private consumption

  • C (G = T)

    • government budget constraint

    • gov. spending = tax revenue

50
New cards

an increase in government spending…

reduces private consumption, increases hours worked, and reduces the real wage

  • higher G = higher T

  • higher T = reduced consumption and leisure = more hours worked

  • more hours worked = increased labor supply = lower real wage

51
New cards

In response to an increase in total labor productivity…

The substitution effect suggests hours worked should increase, while the income effect suggests hours worked should decrease

An increase in TFP (z) raises the real wage (w = MPN↑), which triggers two opposing effects on labor supply:

Substitution Effect:

  • Leisure becomes relatively more expensive (higher opportunity cost)

  • Consumer substitutes away from leisure → works more (N↑)

Income Effect:

  • Higher wage means greater real income/wealth

  • Consumer buys more of all normal goods, including leisure → works less (N↓)

These two effects pull in opposite directions, making the net effect on hours worked theoretically ambiguous

52
New cards

Proportional income tax is distorting because…

  • The competitive equilibrium is not Pareto optimal

  • a tax is distorting when it drives a wedge between the consumer's and firm's optimality conditions, causing the equilibrium to be inefficient.

    Here's the mechanism with a proportional income tax (rate t):

    • Firm's condition: MPN = w (firm pays the full wage)

    • Consumer's condition: MRS = w(1−t) (consumer only keeps the after-tax wage)

    This creates a wedge: MPN ≠ MRS, meaning the social value of an extra unit of labor differs from the consumer's private valuation. The result is that the competitive equilibrium is not Pareto optimal — you could reallocate resources to make someone better off without hurting anyone else.

53
New cards

Indifference Curve

connects a set of points representing consumption bundles among which the consumer is indifferent

54
New cards

MRS l,c

  • Marginal Rate of Substitution of leisure for consumption

  • the rate at which the consumer is willing to substitute leisure for consumption goods

55
New cards

indifference curve properties

  • slopes downward

  • convex (the consumer has a preference for

    diversity in his or her consumption bundle).

56
New cards

properties of firm’s production function

  • Constant returns to scale.

  • Output increases with increases in either the labor input or the capital input.

  • The marginal product of labor decreases as the labor input increases.

  • The marginal product of capital decreases as the capital input increases.

  • The marginal product of labor increases as the quantity of the capital input increases.

  • The marginal product of capital increases as the quantity of the labor input increases.

57
New cards

adding capital _________ the marginal product of labor, and ______ the TFP

  • increases

  • increases

58
New cards

static model exogenous variables:

G, K, A

59
New cards

Production Possibilities Frontier

set of all feasible bundles of consumption and leisure that can be produced.

60
New cards

slope of the PPF

  • MRT (L,C) = -w

  • Marginal Rate of Transformation of Leisure

    into Consumption

61
New cards

the competitive equilibrium is constructed by…

  • superimposing the consumer’s indifference curves on the diagram that includes the PPF.

  • competitive equilibrium is where the indifference curve is tangent to the

    PPF

62
New cards
63
New cards

Pareto Optimal

  • there is no way to rearrange production or to reallocate goods so that someone is made better off without making someone else worse off

64
New cards

Pareto Improvement

  • makes at least one agent better off without making any other agents worse off.

65
New cards

Properties of a Pareto Optimal Equilibrium

MRS(L,C) = MRT(L,C) = MPn = w

66
New cards

First wellfare theorem

Under certain conditions, a competitive equilibrium is Pareto optimal

67
New cards

Second wellfare theorem

Under certain conditions, a Pareto optimum is a competitive equilibrium.