1/32
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Prosody - in earliest receptive learning and speech production
— Melodic line of speech
first windows babies have into structure of language
in womb via rhythmic sound waves
Categorical Perception (children)
— Brain groups continuous sensory inputs (like sounds/colours) into categories
Children
6-8m discriminate subtle phonetics
3-6y establish categories for speech sounds and facial expressions
Categorical Perception (adults)
categories become sharper - refined and consistent
better at ignoring within-category variations (diff versions of letter d)
can process words automatically
Habituation/Dishabituation
H - decrease in response to a repeated stimulus (tune out)
D - rapid recovery of original response, triggered by introduction of sudden or new stimulus
— live by airport and don’t hear them anymore BUT storm wakes you up and hyper-aware of planes again
Lack of invariance problem
no 1-to-1 unchangeable RS between specific speech sounds (phonemes) and its representation
due to coarticulation or speaker difference (accent)
Visual attention in development (4)
how infants and children learn to select, process and focus on visual info in their environment
Newborn phrase (involuntary) - babies drawn to high contrast movement and bridghtness
2-6m (emerging cortical control) - process finer detail, attention from external features to internal facial features (eyes/mouth)
6-12m (joint attention) - endogenous control and focus on toys/tasks longer
Early childhood to adolescence (exec control) - learn to ignore distractions and focus on tasks for longer 9selective vs sustained attention)
Speech segmentation
— process of identifying boundaries between words, syllables or phonemes
listeners utilise stress patterns and pitch changes
tracks probability of syllables occurring together and sound combinations
— ie in another language
Statistical Learning
— detecting implicit probabilities in sound stream
infants show they can isolate words based on frequency and probability
challenges innate ideas
Comprehension vs Production
C - what is heard or read
starts in womb
6-9m basic word recognition
Age 1 = dozens of commands but produce ½
P - Speaking of Writing
lags behind comp
first words around 12m
combining words 18-24m
Maturation Model
language driven by genetically programmed biological processes
innate abilities
Template model
theoretical frameworks where children implicitly use structural templates to map out and produce complex language
nature approach - social interactions
Noun-first bias and controversy
— learning concrete objects and people quicker than verbs/adjectives in early vocabs
controversy = is bias innate or byproduct of languages spoken to them?
Fast-Mapping
— children rapidly acquire/retain meanings of new words after minimal exposure
builds ‘skeletal’ placeholder for its meanings and refines over time and exposure
Referential Indeterminacy (Quine 1960 Gavagai)
No objective fact of the matter regarding exactly what object or concept a word’s meaning is from
Rabbit could mean verb, part of the animal etc
Whole object assumption/bias
children naturally assume new word refers to entire object than its individual parts, properties or actions
— ball could mean to kick, the colour, the shape, etc
Mutual exclusivity assumption
where children assume that object can only have one single name
— if child knows that dog is and hears adult point at unfamiliar dog and say wug, child assign’s wug to the unfamiliar animal.
Joint attention & social-pragmatic accounts
JA
coordinate attention between person, object and other person - 9-12m
SPA
Bruner/Tomasello
children learn how to use language by understanding communicative intentions of others
Telegraphic stage
infants 18-30m speak in short, simple, 2-3 word phrases
primarily using nouns, verbs and adjectives
— Daddy go
— Where ball
Holophrastic Speech
single word to express entire idea
9-18m
heavily relies on context and tone.
— food
— ball
— up
‘Wug Test’ Berko 1958
children generalised grammatical rules rather than memorising words
experimenter asks child to pluralise a ‘wug’ creature
supports nativism - brain wired to apply rules when needed
Factors in learning grammatical morphemes
semantic complexity - how easy concept is to understand
Input frequency - often its heard
perceptual salience - noticeable in speech
native language transfer - for L2
Over-regularisation
children apply regular grammar rules t irregular words
goed/went
tooth/teeth
sign of cognitive development
U-shaped curve
non-linear learning where performance starts high, temporarily declines, then rises again
High accuracy - children memorise through imitation
Dip - overgeneralisation (goed/went)
Target performance - figure expectations to rules and synthesise learning
Poverty of stimulus argument
nativist - Chomsky 1980
children acquire lang to quickly for it to be explained solely by environment
environment too limited
Parameter-setting model
Humans born with universal grammar principles and binary switches (para).
Child acquires native lang by setting mental switches baed on what they hear
Verb island hypothesis
Tomasello 1992
young children don’t initially possess abstract grammatical rules
learn verbs as isolated ‘islands’
cannot grasp syntactic categories
Simultaneous bilingualism
when child acquires two native langs concurrently from birth/very young
relies on neuroplasticity
Sequential bilingualism
child acquires second language after establishing their first lang
bilingualism and lang discrimination
glottophobia = unfair treatment or prejudice of individuals based on lang/accent/vocab.
bilinguals = biases against non-native accents or code-switching
bilingualism and vocab size
while bilinguals have smaller vocabs in single lang, their total vocab across both languages is equal or larger to monolinguals
grasping underlying concept of words
Critical vs Sensitive period
C - strict, bio determined window of time when environmental input is required for normal acquisition, consequences suggest irreversible defects
S - Flexible, gradual window whereby language development requires inputs, consequences suggest harder learning
Imperfect learning model
L2 acquisition
difficulty fully internalising certain features of a non-native language
missing native-like mastery of specific grammar features
Spatial Modulation (signed langs)
3D signing space to represent grammar, establish characters and convey RS between nouns