1/77
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
development definition
a set of practices, sometimes appearing in conflict with one another, which require- for the reproduction of society- the general transformation and destruction of the natural environoment and social relations
aim of development
to increase the production of commodities geared, by way of exchange, to effective demand
The Thaba-Tseka project
joint world bank/canadian project to decentralize governance
instead reinforced elite control and propaganda
faced local resistance
illustrated mismatch between plans and social realities
world bank framing of lesotho- and ferguson’s response
isolated, traditional, subsistence-based agricultural
economy. This framing suggested that Lesotho was disconnected from regional markets and in
need of development intervention
misleading portrayal that undermined Lesotho’s existing systems of labor and development
main point of ferguson
development is a machine for strengthening state power
the anti-politics machine definition
a system that transforms political struggles into technical problems
mechanisms of the anti politics machine
frames poverty as a technical deficiency
depoliticizes aid and legitimizes intervention
expands bureaucratic reach
technomanagerialism
the belief and practice that societal and environmental challenges should be governed through expert knowledge, technological solutions, and bureaucratic management, thereby depoliticizing decision making and marginalizing democratic, ethical, and social considerations
Tania Li’s definition of “render technical”
the process of translating complex political, social, and economic issues into narrowly defined technical problems with technical solutions. This process changes how problems are understood.
depoliticizes debate by removing questions about power, history, and structural inequality.
limits the range of possible solutions to those that can be implemented through technical expertise.
overall doesn’t solve underlying problems- allows system to keep operating while looking like changes are being made
phatic labor
the work involved in creating and maintaining social relationships that enable the circulation of information, trust, and economic value. This includes everyday communicative practices like visiting, gossiping, and maintaining social ties that create and sustain channels of relationships within a community, which generate communicative infrastructure.
ferguson suggestions for improving development
political participation in one’s own society
engagements with counter-hegemonic social forces
empowerment arises from local struggles: unions, women’s associations, resistance
role of intellectuals: critique, solidarity, local autonomy
what counts as work?
wage labor (productive labor)
domestic labor (reproductive labor)
emotional labor
socializing and gossip
networking and relationship maintenance
microfinance expansion (90s)
reframed poverty as an individual entrepreneurial problem
treated poverty as a lack of credit
emphasized individual initiative over structural reform
positioned women as reliable financial actors
helped financialize the informal economy
women’s empowerment discourse
shifted attention away from other policies such as land reforms, labor rights, SAPs, and state disinvestment
shifted toward individual self improvement, entrepreneurial initiative, and capacity building
how do the case studies demonstrate phatic labor?
In the case of Um Muhammed, her coffeehouse functioned as an economic hub sustained by invisible relational labor. While men occupied the visible productive space, her ongoing work of maintaining relationships and social ties supported the entire system.
In the case of Khadija, phatic labor is seen in the creation of workshop networks built on kinship and social ties. These relationships formed an informal infrastructure that enabled economic activity.
In both scenarios, phatic labor produces communicative infrastructure. It is not merely social interaction, but a form of labor that underpins economic systems by facilitating the circulation of value.
network vs infrastructure models
network: relationships, individuals, personal ties
infrastructure: channels, durable pathways, enables large-scale circulation
what is a semiotic community?
a group of people who share a system of meaning through common symbols, language, and communicative codes
people within it understand what certain symbols mean and what forms of communication are acceptable. These shared interpretive frameworks allow people to interact effectively and coordinate behavior.
Why is a semiotic community important/relevant?
it highlights that communication is not neutral. It depends on shared meanings that are socially constructed. It also connects to phatic labor, as maintaining these shared systems of meaning requires ongoing relational work.
How does development transform commons into commodities?
This process often begins with phatic labor, where people create and maintain social networks. NGOs and development organizations then map and formalize these networks, turning them into data, reports, and measurable metrics. This visibility allows corporations to enter and build systems, such as digital payment platforms, on top of these networks. Over time, what was once a shared social resource becomes privatized and commodified. The value generated through social relationships is extracted and incorporated into formal economic systems.
What does “tragedy of the commons” mean?
the concept that if no one controls access to resources, individuals maximize personal benefit and collective goods become degraded or destroyed
political usefulness of the crisis narrative
serves as a justification for policy changes at national level
generates increasing amounts of international aid money
the desertification crisis narrative
official discourse frames morocco as suffering ecological catastrophe- pastoralists are blamed for overgrazing and degradation
billions invested in anti desertification projects by EU, World Banks, etc
political function: legitimizes state control and international funding
sovereignty
states have supreme authority over their own territory and population
territorial integrity
defined boundaries establish the limits of a states jurisdiction
equality of states
regardless of size or power, all states are equal under international law
non interference
one state cannot legally interfere with the domestic affairs of another
traditional notion of security
state centric- what any one state needs to be protected from
focus on material sources of power (military, economic)
human security concept
redefined the concept of security as: “safety from chronic threats and protection from sudden hurtful disruptions in the pattern of daily life”
safety for people from both violent and non violent threats; freedom from fear and freedom to want
does the security of humans as individuals override the sovereignty of the state?
globalization prompts states to become engaged in preventing issues and intervening before situations spiral out of control
revolution in IT has created increased awareness of injustice and conflicts. this gives a cost to warfare and violence to the state committing it.
UNDP’s seven types of human security (1994)
economic
food
health
environmental
personal
community
political
nontraditional security threats: examples
migration
global crime
trafficking
instability in financial markets and job security
spread of disease
rise of internal conflicts
types of deficiencies in weak states
security deficiency
participation deficiency
infrastructure deficiency
security deficiency
inability of a state to protect their citizens
participation deficiency
when in a state political participation is absent or highly restricted. civil society is absent or dysfunctional
infrastructure deficiency
state is unable to collect taxes effectively, often resulting in a poorly maintained physical infrastructure and a large debt
why are failed/weak states a problem?
they suffer from low external sovereignity
cannot easily prevent hostile non state actors from organizing within them, resulting in greater rates of security threats. weak states become bases and sanctuaries for terrorist and insurgent groups
external sovereignty
the recognition of sovereignty by other states rather than an ability to fulfill functions of a state. limits actions foreign states can take upon a weak state.
main challenges to legitimacy of the state and the state system
democracy
religion
nationalism
fukuyama’s end of history
heralded the triumph of western liberal democracy over other types of political models.
welcomed western policy- believed world would be more secure as a result of it
religion as a challenge to state legitimacy
transnational and potent force- loyalty to religion can override state authority and legitimacy
nationalism as a challenge to state legitimacy
globalization creates pressure for groups (nations) to preserve their identities, undermining the power of the state if it is not a nation-state or contains marginalized nations.
genocide, ethnic cleansing, civil wars, secession
“why are outsiders ruling us?”
Responsibility to Protect Doctrine
made in the UN security council in 2006
facets:
states have r2p their people
states have responsibility to assist other states to assist the people of that state
states should be prepared to take action, in a timely and decisive manner, thru UNSC, on a case by case basis to help protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity.
agents of security besides govts
bureaucracies
corporations
international organizations
NGOs
social movements
religious organizations
private security companies
mamdani: culture talk
predilection to define cultures according to their presumed “essential” characteristics, especially in regard to politics
tendency to think of culture in political, and therefore territorial, terms
functions to erase history and context, dehistoricizes politics
paints people as backward, conforming to lifeless custom, noncreative but simultaneously having abundant capacity for destruction
encourages collective discipline and punishment (colonial model)
truman 4 point plan
support UN
commitment to global economic recovery
strengthen “freedom loving nations” against aggression
making scientific and industrial advances in underdeveloped countries
components of “premodern” societies
prisoner of culture
destructive
encapsulated in ancient texts, often religious ones
no history/politics/debates
savior must come from outside
components of “modern” societies
makes culture
creative
constantly moving to the future
secularism/metaphorical understanding of religious texts
change and innovation
white man’s burden
rendering technical
process by which experts translate political social and economic complexities into technical problems with technical solutions, depoliticizing social issues and legitimizing expert intervention
missing context on burqa
local pashtun custom, expanded at a particular historical time/context
desiring subjects
how we learn to want what we want
what does the narrative of the savior imply?
sense of superiority
danger of reification
history of salvation narrative
post cultural relativism (critical relativism)
a philosophical and analytical approach that acknowledges multiple valid perspectives on reality—shaped by culture, context, or framework—while maintaining a critical evaluation of these viewpoints rather than accepting all as equally valid
migration as a crisis framework
integrates 3 interrelated dimensions: events, discourses, and governance
migration isn’t inherently crisis producing; crises are constructed through representation and response
highlights how discourse shapes perception and justifies policy action
encourages asking who defines crisis, under what conditions, and with what consequences
who defines a migration crisis
states, media, international organizations
language choices
institutions reinforcing distinctions that shape protection and exclusion
usefulness of crisis narratives
depoliticizes root causes like inequality and climate vulnerability
creates self reinforcing cycles of control and misgovernance
positions migration as an external threat, obscuring its structural dimensions
legitimizes extraordinary border and asylum policies
framing migration as a crisis justifies exceptional measures and suspends normal politics
subjectivities
how you learned to be you- what systems ideas etc made you who you are?
what is explicit and what is tacit
positionality
your attributes within a matrix
reflexivity
practices of critically recognizing self and the impact of self
political subjectivity
premodern/modern structure and example of this
how a person or group stakes claims, has a voice, and is recognizable by authorities
illiberal subjects
ideologies, movements, and actors rejecting core liberal democratic principles—such as equality, minority rights, and the rule of law—often favoring cultural homogeneity, nationalism, or authoritarianism.
what to do besides cultural relativism
training sights on ways to make the world more just
change language to solidarity, alliances, coalitions
recognize our own embeddedness
follow the lead of those directly impacted
seven basic tactics of authoritarianism
politicizing independent institutions
spreading disinformation
aggrandizing executive power
quashing dissent
scapegoating vulnerable communities
corrupting elections
stoking violence
democratic backsliding
the process by which a state becomes less democratic over time
no cataclysmic state collapse required, gradual process
facilitated by political polarization, which encourages people to think in terms of us and them and to view political opposition as illegitimate
indicators of democratic backsliding
breakdown in the norms of political behavior and standards
disempowerment of the legislature, courts, and independent regulators
reduction of civil liberties and press freedoms, and/or
harm to the integrity of the electoral system
4 corners of authoritarianism article
ambiguity in the definition of authoritarianism across disciplines: regimes/practices vs personalities/psychology
wants to provide a general concept that travels across levels and objects of analysis
offers new concept: justificatory authoritarianism
not talking about petty authoritarianism or bald coercion
authoritarianism levels of analysis
individual
organizational/group
regime
individual level of analysis
dispositions to endorse unconstrained power for collective benefit
organizational/group level of analysis
parties, movements, bureaucracies coordinating exceptions
regime level of analysis
institutional designs enabling or constraining justification turn to power
right wing authoritarian constituent cluster (RWA)
rooted in perceiving the world as unstable and dangerous, inclining individuals toward conformity to authority, traditional norms, and punitive responses to deviance.
social dominance orientation (SDO)
rooted in viewing society as a competitive hierarchy, inclining individuals to prefer group based dominance and status preservation
justificatory authoritarianism
a framework that licenses exercising unconstrained power over others
suspends or bypasses constraints by appealing to a considerable collective benefit
not merely absence of democracy, not just raw force
reason giving claims about security, emergency, unity, purity, utopia
removal of constraints
allowing some parties to exercise power in a way that preempts or supersedes their being held accountable to some relevant set of norms
types of constraints on power
legal/institutional
social/conventional
moral/ethical
modes of suspension of constraints
emergency declarations, security threats
administrative “reforms” that weaken checks while retaining a democratic façade
bald coercion
force without justificatory appeal
electoral/grassroots authoritarianism
authoritarianism by legitimate means
collective behaviorism
attributing agency/intention primarily to a group