3.) examples of application- Rosalind Hursthouse (Abortion) Martha Nussbaum (FGM)

Pro-Virtue Argument regarding abortion and euthanasia

A Virtue Ethicist might argue that compassion and charity justify ending life in cases of extreme suffering, focusing on acting with wisdom rather than rigid 'pro-choice' or 'pro-life' positions.

Counter-Virtue Argument on justice

The virtue of justice requires respect for the natural telos of human beings; ending life prematurely may indicate a lack of courage or failure to value life as a basis for flourishing.

Pro-Virtue Argument about Female Genital Mutilation (FGM)

A Relativist may argue that FGM promotes community cohesion or cultural identity, viewing it as a form of virtue.

Counter-Virtue Argument against FGM

From an Aristotelian standpoint, a tradition like FGM is only virtuous if it fosters Eudaimonia, as it causes harm and impairs individual flourishing, negating any claims of virtue.

Rosalind Hursthouse's view on abortion (V-rules)

Hursthouse asserts that virtue ethics emphasizes the character of the agent rather than strictly adhering to rights or rules, stressing the importance of acting with compassion and wisdom in decisions regarding abortion.

The role of compassion in abortion decisions

According to Virtue Ethicists, compassion is a vital virtue that may justify the decision to have an abortion, particularly in cases of extreme suffering for both the mother and potential child.

Wisdom in abortion context

Hursthouse suggests that the wisdom displayed by the individual plays a crucial role in abortion decisions, focusing on a thoughtful and measured approach over a binary pro-choice or pro-life stance.

Critique of rigid pro-choice/pro-life positions

Virtue Ethicists critique the rigid categorization of pro-choice or pro-life, advocating for a more nuanced perspective that considers the character and circumstances of the decision-maker.