final - research methods

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/91

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 2:38 AM on 4/11/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

92 Terms

1
New cards

Positivism

The philosophical pillar of quantitative research assuming social reality is objective and can be measured to discover universal causal laws

2
New cards

Deductive Reasoning

Research moving from the general to the specific; it begins with a theoretical pattern and tests it through observations

3
New cards

Variable

A logical grouping of attributes (e.g., "Gender")

4
New cards

Attribute

A characteristic or quality describing an object or person (e.g., "Female")

5
New cards

Independent Variable (IV)

The cause in a relationship; the variable expected to determine an attribute in another

6
New cards

Dependent Variable (DV)

The effect; the variable that depends on or is influenced by the independent variable

7
New cards

Control Variable

Used to generate an unbiased image of the world by maintaining controlled conditions

8
New cards

Spurious

A relationship where an unseen third variable is the actual cause of both the independent and dependent variables

9
New cards

Nomothetic Research

Aims to explain a class of situations efficiently using a few factors, settling for a partial rather than exhaustive explanation

10
New cards

Idiographic Research

Aims to understand a single situation exhaustively, focusing on its unique causes

11
New cards

Hypothesis

An informed, measurable prediction about a relationship between variables based on existing literature

12
New cards

Null Hypothesis

A statement assuming no relationship exists between variables

13
New cards

Falsifiable

A requirement that a hypothesis must be capable of being proven wrong through empirical testing

14
New cards

Unit of Analysis

The "who" or "what" being studied (e.g., individuals, groups, or organizations)

15
New cards

Ecological Fallacy

An error in explanation where researchers make assertions about individuals based on group-level data

16
New cards

Reductionism

An error where complex social phenomena are reduced to a single, simple cause

17
New cards

Directional Hypothesis

Specifies the nature of the relationship (e.g., "Group A will be higher than Group B")

18
New cards

Non-directional Hypothesis

Predicts a relationship exists but does not specify the direction

19
New cards

Confounding Variable

An extraneous factor that can hide or distort the relationship between the independent and dependent variables

20
New cards

Conceptual Definition

An abstract, theoretical idea a researcher seeks to study

21
New cards

Operational Definition

The specific way a concept is measured, turning it into a numerical variable

22
New cards

Empirical Indicators

Specific, observable signs used to measure a concept

23
New cards

Categorical (Discrete) Variable

Assigns observations into particular categories (Nominal/Ordinal)

24
New cards

Continuous Variable

A numerical measure that can take any value within a range (Interval/Ratio)

25
New cards

Nominal Variable

Categories with no ranked order (e.g., gender, marital status)

26
New cards

Ordinal Variable

Categories that are ranked, but the distance between them is unknown (scales)

27
New cards

Interval Variable

Numerical distance between points is equal, but there is no true zero (e.g., IQ scores, years)

28
New cards

Ratio Variable

Precise measurement with a true zero (e.g., income, age in years)

29
New cards

Index

A composite measure that summarizes several specific observations

30
New cards

Scale

A composite measure that captures the intensity or degree of a concept

31
New cards

Face Validity

Whether a measure appears, on the surface, to measure what it claims to

32
New cards

Content Validity

How much a measure covers the full range of meanings within a concept

33
New cards

Criterion Validity

Checking a measure against some external criterion (predictive or concurrent)

34
New cards

Probability Sampling

Every member of the population has an equal and known chance of selection

35
New cards

Simple Random

Every unit has an equal chance via random selection (e.g., computer generator)

36
New cards

Systematic

Selection based on a mathematical algorithm (e.g., every 10th person)

37
New cards

Stratified

Dividing the population into subgroups (strata) and sampling proportionally

38
New cards

Cluster

Sampling naturally occurring groups (e.g., schools) rather than individuals

39
New cards

Non-Probability Sampling

Non-random selection with no known representativeness

40
New cards

Convenience

Choosing participants who are easiest to reach

41
New cards

Purposive

Selecting participants based on specific characteristics

42
New cards

Quota

Selecting a pre-set number of people from specific categories

43
New cards

Snowball

Participants recruit other participants from their social networks

44
New cards

Sampling Frame

The actual list of units from which the sample is drawn

45
New cards

Sampling Element

The individual unit of the population that is selected

46
New cards

Representativeness

The degree to which a sample accurately reflects the population

47
New cards

Generalizability

The extent to which findings can be applied to the broader population (external validity)

48
New cards

Open-ended

Respondents answer in their own words

49
New cards

Close-ended

Respondents choose from provided, mutually exclusive, and exhaustive categories

50
New cards

Double-Barreled

Asking two questions but allowing only one answer

51
New cards

Leading

Questions that suggest a "correct" answer

52
New cards

Loaded

Use of emotionally charged language to bias responses

53
New cards

Vignette

Using a hypothetical story to elicit a response

54
New cards

Contingency/Filter

Questions used to determine if a respondent should answer a subsequent set of questions

55
New cards

Social Desirability Bias

Answering in a way that makes the respondent look good rather than being truthful

56
New cards

Wording Effects

How the specific phrasing of a question influences the answer

57
New cards

Context Effects

How the order or surrounding questions influence a response

58
New cards

True Experiment

Requires an experimental group, a control group, and random assignment

59
New cards

Random Assignment

Dividing subjects into groups using a random process to ensure they are comparable

60
New cards

Hawthorne Effect

Participants change behavior because they know they are being studied

61
New cards

Pretest/Post-test

Measurements taken before and after an intervention

62
New cards

Selection Bias

Error resulting from differences between those who take part in a study and those who do not

63
New cards

Mortality (Attrition)

Participants dropping out of a study over time

64
New cards

Maturation

Changes in subjects over time that happen naturally and are not caused by the intervention

65
New cards

Univariate Statistics

Analysis of a single variable at a time

66
New cards

Multivariate Statistics

Analysis of more than two variables simultaneously

67
New cards

Measures of Central Tendency

  • Mean: The mathematical average.

  • Median: The middle value in a distribution.

  • Mode: The most frequent value

68
New cards

Standard Deviation

A measure of dispersion; high values mean data is spread out, low values mean it is clustered near the mean

69
New cards

Skewness

  • Positive (Right) Skew: High-value outliers pull the mean to the right [history, 643].

  • Negative (Left) Skew: Low-value outliers pull the mean to the left

70
New cards

Errors in Significance

  • Type I Error: Rejecting a null hypothesis that is actually true ("false positive").

  • Type II Error: Failing to reject a null hypothesis that is actually false ("false negative")

71
New cards

Stakeholders

People in an organization invested in the program being evaluated

72
New cards

Prospective Cohort Study

Following a group into the future to observe outcomes

73
New cards

Retrospective Cohort Study

Looking back at past data for a specific group to determine outcomes

74
New cards

Formative Evaluation

Focused on improving program implementation and function while it is running

75
New cards

Summative Evaluation

Conducted post-project to determine if goals and outcomes were achieved

76
New cards

Needs Assessment

Identifying unmet needs and gaps in service to prioritize resources

77
New cards

Evaluability Assessment

Determining if a program is capable of being evaluated at all

78
New cards

Mixed Methods

Systematic integration of quantitative and qualitative data in a single project

79
New cards

Investigator

Using multiple researchers to observe the same phenomenon

80
New cards

Theoretical

Using different theoretical perspectives to interpret one dataset

81
New cards

Methodological

Using different data collection methods (e.g., survey and interview)

82
New cards

Analytical

Using different ways to analyze the same data

83
New cards

Concurrent

Carrying out components at approximately the same time

84
New cards

Sequential

Carrying out one component after another (e.g., QUAL → QUANT)

85
New cards

Terra Nullius / Datum Nullius

Historically used concepts of "no man's land" applied to data, suggesting it belongs to no one and can be taken

86
New cards

indigenous Data Sovereignty

The right of Indigenous peoples to govern the collection, ownership, and use of data about them

87
New cards

OCAP Principles:

  • Ownership: Communities own their information.

  • Control: Communities control all aspects of research.

  • Access: Communities have access to data about themselves.

  • Possession: Communities physically possess the data

88
New cards

Statistics as Culturally Embedded

Recognition that numerical data is not neutral but reflects the cultural values and biases of those who collect it

89
New cards

5D Data

A framework for Indigenous data including: Disaggregated, Diverse, Decolonized, Distinction-based, and Data-sovereign

90
New cards

Data-rich vs. Data-poor Actors

Disparities in who has access to high-quality data and information resources

91
New cards

Culture as Cure

Using traditional cultural knowledge and practices as the foundation for community wellness and reintegration

92
New cards

Whakapapa

A Māori term referring to genealogy or the layers of relationships and history that connect people to place and each other