4.1 Supreme Court and Interactions with Government (UK Government)

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/4

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 5:07 PM on 5/25/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

5 Terms

1
New cards

What is the role and composition of the Supreme Court?

  • Created in 2009, replacing the Law Lords

  • Usually 12 Justices

  • Appointed through independent commissions + separate from Parliament to strengthen judicial independence

Roles:

  • Final court of appeal

  • Interprets statutes

  • Reviews executive actions

  • Determines devolution disputes

  • Protects rule of law

2
New cards

What are the arguments for and against the existence of neutrality within the Supreme Court?

For:

  • Judges appointed independently

  • Security of tenure

  • Cannot be removed easily

  • Avoid party membership

Against:

  • Personal ideology may affect judgement

  • Judges come from similar social and educational backgrounds

  • Court decisions influence political issues

3
New cards

What are the arguments for and against the existence of strong judicial independence in the Supreme Court?

For:

  • Constitutional Reform Act 2005 separated judiciary from legislature

  • Salaries protected

  • Secure appointments

Against:

  • Parliament can overturn court decisions

  • Govt appoints judges indirectly

  • Media pressure can affect perception

4
New cards

What is Judicial Review and Ultra Vires?

Judicial Review examines:

  • Whether procedures were followed

  • Whether powers were exceeded

  • Whether actions were irrational

Examples of Ultra Vires:

  • Miller Case II

  • Supreme Court ruled suspension of Parliament unlawful

  • Govt had acted beyond lawful authority

5
New cards

What are arguments for and against the extent of Supreme Court influence being significant?

For:

  • Can invalidate govt actions

  • Shapes constitutional interpretation

  • Influences policy indirectly

Against:

  • Cannot strike down acts of Parliament

  • Parliamentary sovereignty remains intact

  • Parliament can legislate around rulings