1/181
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Explicit retrieval
conscious and controllable; requires deliberate mental effort (ex: remembering a phone number).
Implicit retrieval
automatic and below threshold of conscious awareness (ex: driving a car)
Accessible memory is much smaller than
Available (stored) memory
Above the iceberg =
Retrieval
Below the iceberg =
Available memory
In retrieval, information is stored but not necessarily accessible without a…
Cue
Feeling of Knowing (FOK) Judgement
Attempting to make a quick estimate of whether we would be able to recognize something without actually trying to recall it
FOK Paradigm
(1) Attempt to recall information, (2) judge whether they could recognize it, (3) attempt recognition
Metacognitive Nature
The individual asks themselves about the state of their knowledge; involves thinking about our own knowledge.
Principle #1 of FOK: Automatic
Judgments happen instantly and automatically
Principle #2 of FOK: Strategy Search
Judgement acts as s strategic decision gate
Principle #3 of FOK: Retrieval Termination
Serves as an efficient mechanism; if there is no “feeling” that we know the answer, we terminate the search immediately to avoid wasting cognitive resources
Principle #4 of FOK: Metacognitive Ability
We possess a rapid self-assessment quality; we can evaluate the state of our own knowledge and predict recognition success before actual retrieval occurs
Theory #1 of FOK: Direct-Access Explanation
Attempts to retrieve the memory directly as assess the “strength” of the memory trace itself
Theory #2 of FOK: Indirect-Access Explanation
(1) Cue Familiarity Hypothesis: people use a shortcut or heuristic to get a quick sense of whether the memory might be available based on the familiarity of the cue. (2) Target Accessibility Hypothesis: we attempt to retrieve a few details about the memory and then take into account how easily it was to recall them.
Strategy #1 of FOK: Stimulus
You encounter a question or cue
Strategy #2 of FOK: Cue Familiarity
Do you recognize the topic or the cue itself
Strategy #3 of FOK: Target Accessibility
Can you recall related details or fragments
Strategy #4 of FOK: Full Retrieval
Invest effort to fully retrieve the memory
Retrieval Cues
Information that is used to activate a memory trace to see if we can access a memory; includes emotions, beliefs, and context
External Cues
Visual, sound, smells, atmosphere
Internal Cues
Thoughts, mood, physiological state, intoxication
Availability
The memory traces exist in your brain’s storage
Accessibility
A memory can be available but not accessible if you lack the right cues
Free Recall
Few cues are provided and it is the hardest to access (ex: writing an essay using specific evidence)
Cued Recall
Hints provided and improves accessibility
Recognition
Target is the cue and has the easiest access (ex: multiple choice quiz)
Retrospective Memory
Recall past events, people, words, and experiences previously learned or encountered; what happened in the past?
Prospective Memory
Remembering to carry out some intended action in the future without any explicit reminder; what do I need to do in the future?
Stages of prospective memory
(1) Intention Formation, (2) Retention Interval (3) Performance Interval (4) Initiation and Execution (5) Evaluation
Intention Formation
Encoding the intention and the action to be performed
Retention Interval
Delay period: monitoring for cues while doing other tasks
Performance Interval
The window of opportunity opens to execute the plan
Initiation and Execution
Retrieving the intention and performing the action
Evaluation
Recording the outcome (completed or cancelled)
Sources of prospective memory
(1) Self-generated and (2) assigned
Self-Generated
Tasks you decide to do yourself (ex: I need to buy milk on the way home)
Assigned
Tasks others ask or tell you to do (ex: please submit this report by 5pm)
Failures of prospective memory
(1) Everyday annoyances (ex: burning the food in the oven because you forgot the timer) and (2) critical failures (ex: a surgeon leaving a medical instrument inside a patient)
Future tasks of prospective memory
(1) Time-based and (2) event-based
Time based tasks
Perform an action at a specific time or after a specific duration; difficulty level: harder (requires self-monitoring)
Event based tasks
Perform an action when a specific external event occurs; the environment provides the cue, reducing the need for constant internal monitoring
Consolidation
Process of stabilizing a memory trace after initial acquisition; transforms a fragile new memory into a stable long-term memory
Active Trace Theory
When a memory is retrieved, it enters an active state where it becomes unstable and can be altered before being stored again (reconsolidated)
Context of active trace theory
Traumatic memories are intrusive and carry an overwhelming emotional charge
Goal of active trace theory
Dampen the emotional intensity of the memory without erasing the factual event itself
Mechanism of active trace theory
Recall the trauma, administer the beta-blocker medication (lowers blood pressure and slows heart rate), and re-store the traumatic memory with reduced emotional affect
Reconsolidation
Retrieval is not a passive playback; rather, it initiates a cellular process that temporarily makes the memory trace unstable again
Correction (reason a memory becomes unstable)
Allows us to fix errors in the formation that might be incorrect or outdated
Updating (reason a memory becomes unstable)
Allows us to integrate new details into existing memories
Retrieval practice effect
The act of retrieving a memory is not just a check; it is an active modifier that makes the memory more accessible in the future
Desirable difficulties
Retrieval is most effective when it is difficult; struggling to recall an answer signals the brain that this information is important
Place-dependent context cues
Physical environment matches where the learning took place
State dependent context cues
Internal physiological state matches the state during encoding
Mood-dependent context cues
When your emotional mood matches the mood you were in when you encoded the memory
Same environment situational effect
It is more beneficial to study in a place that resembles the testing environment
Mental reinstatement situational effect
If you blank out during an exam, close your eyes and visualize the place where you studied; this mental context can trigger retrieval cues
Regulated state situational effect
Avoid studying under conditions you cannot replicate during the test'; don't rely on loud music or caffeine if you can't have them during the exam
Matched processing situational effect
Practice the type of retrieval required: if it's an essay exam, practice writing essays
Retrieval in groups
When people work together to remember information, we might expect the group to outperform individuals
Nominal Group
Pooled results of individuals working alone (greater than)
Individual Group
Group working together to recall (less than)
Retrieval Strategy Disruption
Listening to others' output disrupts your own idiosyncratic organization and retrieval plan, forcing you to switch strategies inefficiently
Social Loafing
Individuals may exert less effort in a group setting, relying on others to do the work of retrieval
Evaluation Apprehension
Fear of being judged by the group may cause individuals to without potential answers if they aren't 100% sure
Cognitive Overload
Listening to others and monitoring the groups' progress consumes the cognitive resources (working memory) that could otherwise be used for retrieval
Reducing collaborative inhibition
Certain conditions can minimize the disruption and allow groups to perform closer to their potential
Group Familiarity
Close friends or couples often develop a transactive memory system; they know who knows what, reducing conflict and overlap
Division of Labor
Assigning specific roles or categories minimized strategy disruption
Expertise
Experts have highly organized knowledge structures that are more robust and resistant to disruption from others' output
Remembering
Happens when we retrieve vivid, detailed memories and can relive them
Knowing
Describes retrieving general knowledge and concepts that are associated with past learning
Episodic Memories
Events from everyday life, our emotional reactions, what we sensed at the time, recalled in chronological order, how we interpret or perceived what went on
Involuntary episodic memories
Can present themselves without a conscious search (ex: a song getting stuck in your head after hearing it earlier).
Observer in episodic memories
Perspective outside themselves, watching themselves; this is common in childhood memories; influenced by photos and videos; makes it difficult to judge whether the memory was actually real or created
Our interests and needs increase…
The depth of processing and attention we pay; if the event is processed more deeply, then we are able to recall it better later
Rehearsal
How often an event is repeated and seems to alter our memory of those events as well
Flashbulb Memories
Often emotional and exceptionally vivid memories; feels clear and accurate although they can contain inaccuracies; passage of time and physical proximity to the original event are factors that predict the accuracy of memories
Autobiographical Memories
Mix of personal events about general knowledge; includes how we have seen ourselves in the past; represents biological facts about our lives and includes copies of events; subjective interpretation of the event
Direct Function (of autobiographical memories)
Using past personal experiences to guide current and future thoughts, actions, and decision-making
Social Function (of autobiographical memories)
Using personal memories to build social bonds, foster intimacy, and facilitate understanding in relationships
Self-Function (of autobiographical memories)
Using personal memories to construct, maintain, and update a coherent sense of identity, or “self,” over time
Structure of autobiographical memories
Can be retrieved on demand; includes grouped information around personal events; organized chronologically by periods of one’s life or by themes; more pleasant events are better remembered
Conway’s Self-Memory System
Describes the organization and structure of autobiographical memories; 2 major components: working self and autobiographical knowledge base
Working Self
Perspective we have on ourselves today; our sense of who we are and what we want to become; the purpose is to limit what we spend time thinking about so that we can focus on what matters most to us
Autobiographical Knowledge Base
Information grouped by lifetime periods, the most broad category and general events; includes factual knowledge about ourselves as well as evaluations about who we are; acts as a “life story”
Developmental changes of autobiographical memory
When we are younger, we do not have the ability to create a narrative story of our memories. As we get older, we get better at connecting events into a story.
Left hemisphere
Retrieval activity begins here; the presence of emotion in an autobiographical memory tends to be what shifts the balance in brain activity from the left hemisphere to the right
Prefrontal cortex
Necessary for the sense of memory being in relation to ourselves
Dorsal parietal cortex
Controlled attention to our autobiographical memory is engaged
Declarative Memory
Conscious recollection of facts and events (explicit); know THAT; processed by the hippocampus; ex: knowing that a dog is a mammal (semantic) or remembering your last birthday party (episodic)
Procedural Memory
Unconscious memory of skills and habits (implicit); knowing HOW; managed by the cerebellum; ex: knowing how to type on a computer
Semantic Memory
Stores general world knowledge: facts, concepts, meanings, language; independent of personal experience or time; structured network of information
Remember
Clearly recall when you heard the word (episodic memory, context); conscious recollection of details; mentally re-experiencing an event an its context from one’s past
Know
Words feel familiar but no specific context; semantic or familiarity-based memory; accurately knowing some facts from one’s past
New
Word was not presented before
Brain evidence
Neuroimaging support this distinction: the areas of the brain activated during semantic memories are not the same as those activated during episodic memories
PET scans demonstrate that…
Retrieval of semantic memories rely on: left hemisphere (ex: recalling the meaning of photosynthesis). Retrieval of episodic memories rely on: right hemisphere (ex: recalling the day you dissected a leaf in biology class).
Memorization
Not an actual visual copy of the word; the meaning of the word altered by the context of the moment is what is actually stored
Single-Stage Model
Recall depends on finding a direct match between the retrieval cues and the content of the memory (happens faster); retrieval of recognition succeeds when there’s a strong, unique match between the cue and the stored memory, without needing additional processing stages