1/38
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Attribution
How we make judgements about the causes of behavior
Dispositional attribution
Behavior due to internal factors (personality, intelligence).
Situational attribution
Behavior due to external factors (environmental setting, distractions, and circumstance).
Correspondence bias
General tendency to overestimate dispositional factors and underestimate situational factors
Fundamental attribution error
Complete failure to consider situational factors, reliance on dispositional factors.
Actor-observer bias
Emphasize dispositional factors to explain the behavior of others, emphasize situational factors to explain own behavior.
Self-serving bias
Attribute our own successes to dispositional factors, attribute our own failures to situational factors
Group-serving bias
Attributions made by a group or organization, attribute group’s successes to dispositional factors and group’s failures to situational factors.
Just-world belief
Assume that good things happen to good people, assume bad things happen to bad people.
Attitudes
Favorable or unfavorable evaluations that predispose behavior toward a person, object or situation.
Attitude formation
Attitude adoption as social inclusion, learning, or genetic influences.
Cognitive dissonance
Uncomfortable cognitive state due to perception of contradictory information, action does not match beliefs.
Dissonance reduction
Trying to reduce mental discomfort when beliefs, attitudes, or behaviors don’t match.
Cognitive consistency
Preference for holding congruent attitudes and beliefs.
Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM)
Explanation for response to persuasive messages. 2 main routes the brain takes when processing persuasive information.
Central route
Consider arguments carefully and thoughtfully. Quality of argument.
Peripheral route
Evaluation shortcuts. Number of arguments, how the message is presented, and characteristics of the speaker. Requires less attention.
Defensive avoidance
Avoids thinking about, learning about, or dealing with information because it is threatening, uncomfortable, or anxiety-provoking. May make fear appeals less effective.
Belief perserverence
The tendency to cling to one’s initial belief even after receiving new information that contradicts or disconfirms the basis of that belief.
Backfire effect
Given evidence against their beliefs, people can reject the evidence and believe even more strongly.
Prejudice
Attitude or prejudgment about others. Usually negative.
Stereotypes
Simplified sets of traits associated with group membership.
Confirmation bias
We search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms our preexisting beliefs and hypotheses.
Process of stereotyping
Arises from our tendency to categorize and generalize. Stereotyped categories can contain accurate information, but become inaccurate by oversimplifying, exclusion of information.
In-group favoritism
We tend to favor people in our own group. We tend to view people in an out-group more negatively. Evolutionary basis.
Stereotype threat
Feeling of being at risk of conforming to stereotypes about your social group.
Social norms
Rules for behavior in social settings. Explicit (no smoking indoors). Implicit (saying bless you).
Conformity
Matching behavior and appearance to perceived social norms.
Compliance
Agreement to requests from others with no perceived authority.
Obedience
Compliance to requests from authority figures.
Reasons for conformity
Useful in new or ambiguous situations, reduces risk of social rejection.
Foot-in-the-door compliance technique
Smaller request (yes), then larger request.
Door-in-the-face compliance technique
Larger request (no), then more moderate request
Deindividuation
Immersion of the individual within a group, leading to anonymity.
Dehumanization
Depriving a person or group of positive human qualities.
Social facilitation
The presence of others changes individual performance. Familiar tasks - better performance. Unfamiliar tasks - poorer performance. Heightened arousal for complex tasks.
Social loafing
Lower effort and motivation when working in a group vs. working alone.
Group polarization
During discussion, members tend to take more extreme positions in direction they were inclined to hold.
Groupthink
Group does not question its decisions critically; often leads to flawed decisions.