1/39
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Fraud is defined as
an intentional misstatement of financial statements.
The two main categories of fraud are:
Fraudulent financial reporting:
Misappropriation of assets (theft)
Fraudulent financial reporting:
Intentionally wrong finacial statments
Happens at the highest level
“Usually” larger
Misstate financials
Under armor > $400 M
Misappropriation of assets (theft)
Theft of assets
happens at lower levels
Steal inventory
$
Three conditions for fraud arising from fraudulent financial reporting and misappropriations of assets are referred to as the fraud triangle: (All 3 must be present)
*Incentives/Pressure
*Opportunity
Attitude/rationalization

*Incentives/Pressure
Reaseon
Hit a bonus
*Opportunity
Execute
Post the journal entry
Attitude/rationalization
Justify
Why fraud was ok
Most Commonly Cited Fraud Risk Conditions

Auditing standards require the auditor to
assess the risk of material misstatement due to fraud
As auditors consider a broad set of information, including fraud risk factors, they must maintain a level of professional skepticism, which consists of:
Questioning mind
Critical evaluation of audit evidence
There are five sources of information that help auditors to assess fraud risks:
Communications among audit team
Inquiries of management
Risk factors
Analytical procedures
Other information
Auditors evaluate all the sources of information gathered to assess the risk of material misstatement due to fraud as part of
audit planning
While the assessment of fraud is conducted as part of audit planning, the auditor’s assessment of fraud risk should be
on going throughout the audit
Management is responsible for implementing Corprate governance and control procedures to:
Minimize the risk of fraud,
Guidance developed for auditors by the AICPA identifies three elements to prevent, deter, and detect fraud:
Minimize the risk of fraud, which can be reduced through a combination of
Prevent (Controls)
Detect (Controls)
Deter: Include things like prosecution, job loss, etc
Guidance developed for auditors by the AICPA identifies three elements to prevent, deter, and detect fraud:
Culture (Ethics/Interity)
How does management evaluate the fraud risk
Audit committee oversight
Whistleblower hotline → SOX mandate
Report to someone outside management
Adj Entry- Unique Expense
AI → Can only be approved vendors (Vendor List (Control)(No pmts to fake Vendors))
Exception report: Can buy Chat GPT
Acceptable Override
When the auditor identifies risks of material misstatement due to fraud, auditing standards require the auditor to develop responses to those risks at three levels:
Overall responses (Errors also have these)
Responses at the Assertion (Errors also have these)
Responses related to management override (Unique to Fraud)
The auditor’s assessment of the risks of material misstatement due to fraud should be
Ongoing throughout the audit and coordinated with the auditor’s other risk assessment procedures
Auditors should be alert for the following conditions when doing the audit (1 of 2):
Discrepancies in the accounting records
Ex: Late JE, Rounded numbers
Confilicting/missing evidence
Ex: Pre-numbered checks and some are missing
Problematic or unusual relationships between the auditor and management
Results from substantive or final review stage Analytical Procedures that indicate a previously unrecognized fraud risk
Responses to Inquries made throughout the audit that are vague or implausible or that produce evidence that is inconsistent with other information
Interview at lower levels
Do not only talk with management
Specific Fraud Risk Areas
Revenue and accounts receivable fraud risks+
Misappropriation (theft) of receipts involving revenue
Inventory fraud risks
Other areas of fraud risk:
Fixed assets
Intangible assets
Payroll expenses
Three main types of revenue manipulations are:
Fictitious (Fake) revenue/Sales
Premature revenue recognition (wrong period)
Manipulation of adjustments (bad debt expense, Returns/allowances)
Many potential warning signals or symptoms indicate revenue fraud
Useful procedures include
analytical procedures, data analytics, and testing for documentary discrepancies
Revenue: Overstatement
Fake
Pull ahead
Contra Revenue Accounts
Mike: Sale UTA →$100 m
Inflated sale→ $300 m
Account bal $300 M
Returns Allow $200 M
Misappropriation (theft) of receipts involving revenue includes:
Failure to record a sale
Theft of cash after recorded
Revenue and accounts receivable fraud risks Warning signs
Internal controls, analytical procedures and other comparisons may be useful
Sales closing process (Drawer close)
Electronic payment
Checks go to bank processing center
Inventory is susceptible to:
Manipulation by managers who want to achieve certain financial reporting objectives
Misappropriation (theft) because it is usually readily saleable
Inventory fraud risks Warning signs
Analytical procedures are one useful technique for
detecting inventory fraud
Purchases and accounts payable fraud risks
The most common fraud in the acquisitions area:
Payments to Fake Vendors and deposit the cash in a Fiticious or Wrong account
Fraud Detection Methods

Frauds are often detected through:
The receipt of an anonymous tip
Management review
Internal audit
Accident
When fraud is suspected, the auditor often begins by
Making additional inquiries to determine whether fraud actually exists
Auditors can use one or more of the following inquiry categories depending on their objectives:
Informational inquiry
Assessment inquiry
Interrogative inquiry
Auditing standards require the auditor to obtain additional evidence to determine whether
material fraud has occurred
In addition to inquiry, auditors often:
Apply data analytics
Expand other substantive testing
Gather more evidence
Auditors are required to document the following matters related to their consideration of material misstatements due to fraud (1 of 3):
Significant Decisions made during the discussion among engagement team in planning the audit
Procedures performed to obtain information necessary to identify and assess the risks of material fraud
Specific risks of material fraud that were identified at both the overall financial statement level and the assertion level and the auditor’s reponse to those risks
Reasons supporting a Conclusion that there is not a significant risk of material improper revenue recognition
Results of procedures performed to address the risk of management override of controls
Other conditions and analytical relationships indicating that additional auditing procedures or other responses were required, and the Actions taken by the auditor in response
The nature of communications about fraud made to management, the audit committee, or others