Chapter 10 Assessing and Responding to Fraud Risks

Types of Fraud (1 of 2)

  • Fraud is defined as an intentional misstatement of financial statements. The two main categories are:

    • Fraudulent financial reporting: Intentionally wrong finacial statments

      • Happens at the highest level

      • “Usually” larger

      • Misstate financials

        • Under armor > 400M</p></li></ul></li></ul></li><li><p>Misappropriationofassets(theft)</p><ul><li><p>Theftofassets</p></li><li><p>happensatlowerlevels</p></li><li><p>Stealinventory</p><ul><li><p>400 M</p></li></ul></li></ul></li><li><p>Misappropriation of assets (theft)</p><ul><li><p>Theft of assets</p></li><li><p>happens at lower levels</p></li><li><p>Steal inventory</p><ul><li><p>

Conditions for Fraud

  • Three conditions for fraud arising from fraudulent financial reporting and misappropriation of assets are referred to as the fraud triangle: (All 3 must be present)

    • *Incentives/Pressure

      • Reaseon

        • Hit a bonus

    • *Opportunity

      • Execute

        • Post the journal entry

    • Attitude/rationalization

      • Justify

        • Why fraud was ok

Figure 10.1
The Fraud Triangle
Figure 10.2
Most Commonly Cited Fraud Risk Conditions
Source: Global Profiles of the Fraudster, KPMG, 2016.
Let’s Discuss (1 of 7)

  • What are the three conditions of fraud often referred to as “the fraud triangle”?

  • Define misappropriation of assets and give two examples of misappropriation of assets.

  • Give examples of risk factors for fraudulent financial reporting for each of the three fraud conditions: incentives/pressures, opportunities, and attitudes/rationalization.

Assessing the Risk of Fraud

  • Auditing standards require the auditor to assess the risk of material misstatement due to fraud

  • As auditors consider a broad set of information, including fraud risk factors, they must maintain a level of professional skeptisim, which consists of:

    • Questioning mind

    • Critical evaluation of audit evidence

Sources of Information to Assess Fraud Risk

  • There are five sources of information that help auditors to assess fraud risks:

    • Communications among audit team

    • Inquiries of management

    • Risk factors

    • Analytical procedures

    • Other information

Identified Risks of Material Misstatement Due to Fraud

  • Auditors evaluate all the sources of information gathered to assess the risk of material misstatment due to fraud as part of audit planning

  • While the assessment of fraud is conducted as part of audit planning, the auditor’s assessment of fraud risk should be on going throughout the audit

Let’s Discuss (2 of 7)

  • The two components of professional skepticism are a questioning mind and a critical assessment of the audit evidence.

    • How do these components help an auditor distinguish an unintentional misstatement from an intentional (fraudulent) misstatement?

Corporate Governance Oversight to Reduce Fraud Risk (1 of 2)

  • Management is responsible for implementing Corprate governance and control procedures to:

    • Minimize the risk of fraud, which can be reduced through a combination of

      • Prevent (Controls)

      • Detect (Controls)

      • Deter: Include things like prosecution, job loss, etc

  • Guidance developed for auditors by the AICPA identifies three elements to prevent, deter, and detect fraud:

    • Culture (Ethics/Interity)

    • How does management evaluate the fraud risk

    • Audit committee oversight

      • Whistleblower hotline → SOX mandate

      • Report to someone outside management

Let’s Discuss (3 of 7)

  • What sources are used by the auditor to gather information to assess fraud risk?

  • Distinguish management’s responsibility from the audit committee’s responsibility for designing and implementing antifraud programs and controls within a company.

Adj Entry- Unique Expense

  • AI → Can only be approved vendors (Vendor List (Control)(No pmts to fake Vendors))

  • Exception report: Can buy Chat GPT

    • Acceptable Override

  • Post JE

Responding to the Risk of Fraud (1 of 3)

  • When the auditor identifies risks of material misstatement due to fraud, auditing standards require the auditor to develop responses to those risks at three levels:

    • Overall responses (Errors also have these)

    • Responses at the Assertion (Errors also have these)

    • Responses related to management override (Unique to Fraud)

  • The auditor’s assessment of the risks of material misstatement due to fraud should be Ongoing throughout the audit and coordinated with the auditor’s other risk assessment procedures

  • Auditors should be alert for the following conditions when doing the audit (1 of 2):

    • Discrepancies in the accounting records

      • Ex: Late JE, Rounded numbers

    • Confilicting/missing evidence

      • Ex: Pre-numbered checks and some are missing

    • Problematic or unusual relationships between the auditor and management

    • Results from substantive or final review stage Analytical Procedures that indicate a previously unrecognized fraud risk

    • Responses to Inquries made throughout the audit that are vague or implausible or that produce evidence that is inconsistent with other information

      • Interview at lower levels

        • Do not only talk with management

Let’s Discuss (4 of 7)

  • Describe the types of overall responses by auditors to address fraud risk.

Specific Fraud Risk Areas (1 of 4)

  • Revenue and accounts receivable fraud risks (1 of 2)

    • Three main types of revenue manipulations are:

      • Fictitious (Fake) revenue/Sales

      • Premature revenue recognition (wrong period)

      • Manipulation of adjustments (bad debt expense, Returns/allowances)

  • Many potential warning signals or symptoms indicate revenue fraud

    • Useful procedures include analytical procedures, data analytics, and testing for documentary discrepancies

  • Revenue: Overstatement

    1. Fake

    2. Pull ahead

    3. Contra Revenue Accounts

      • Mike: Sale UTA →$100 m

        • Inflated sale→ $300 m

          • Account bal $300 M

          • Returns Allow $200 M

  • Misappropriation (theft) of receipts involving revenue include:

    • Failure to record a sale

    • Theft of cash after recorded

  • Warning signs

    • Internal controls, analytical procedures and other comparisons may be useful

      • Sales closing process (Drawer close)

      • Electronic payment

      • Checks go to bank processing center

  • Inventory fraud risks

    • Inventory is susceptible to:

      • Manipulation by managers who want to achieve certain financial reporting objectives

      • Misappropriation (theft) because it is usually readily saleable

  • Warning signs

    • Analytical procedures are one useful technique for detecting inventory fraud

  • Purchases and accounts payable fraud risks

    • The most common fraud in the acquisitions area:

      • Payments to Fake Vendors and deposit the cash in a Fiticious or Wrong account

  • Other areas of fraud risk:

    • Fixed assets

    • Intangible assets

    • Payroll expenses

Let’s Discuss (5 of 7)

  • You go through the drive-through window of a fast food restaurant and notice a sign that reads, “Your meal is free if we fail to give you a receipt.”

    • Why would the restaurant post this sign?

Figure 10.8
Fraud Detection Methods
Source: Report to the Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse, Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, 2018, 2016, 2014.
Responsibilities When Fraud Is Suspected (1 of 3)

  • Frauds are often detected through:

    • The receipt of an anonymous tip

    • Management review

    • Internal audit

    • Accident

  • When fraud is suspected, the auditor often begins by

    • Making additional inquiries to determine whether fraud actually exists

    • Auditors can use one or more of the following inquiry categories depending on their objectives:

      • Informational inquiry

      • Assessment inquiry

      • Interrogative inquiry

  • Auditing standards require the auditor to obtain additional evidence to determine whether material fraud has occurred

  • In addition to inquiry, auditors often:

    • Apply data analytics

    • Expand other substantive testing

      • Gather more evidence

Let’s Discuss (6 of 7)

  • You have identified a suspected fraud involving the company’s controller.

    • What must you do in response to this discovery?

    • How might this discovery affect your report on internal control when auditing a public company?

Documenting the Fraud Assessment (1 of 3)

  • Auditors are required to document the following matters related to their consideration of material misstatements due to fraud (1 of 3):

    • Significant Decisions made during the discussion among engagement team in planning the audit

    • Procedures performed to obtain information necessary to identify and assess the risks of material fraud

    • Specific risks of material fraud that were identified at both the overall financial statement level and the assertion level and the auditor’s reponse to those risks

  • Reasons supporting a Conclusion that there is not a significant risk of material improper revenue recognition

  • Results of procedures performed to address the risk of management override of controls

  • Other conditions and analytical relationships indicating that additional auditing procedures or other responses were required, and the Actions taken by the auditor in response

  • The nature of communications about fraud made to management, the audit committee, or others

Let’s Discuss (7 of 7)

  • What are the three ways auditors respond to fraud risks?

  • Describe the three main techniques used to manipulate revenue.

  • Describe the types of information that should be included in the auditor’s working papers as evidence of the auditor’s fraud assessment procedures.