1/13
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Consolidating HVII claim
weak claim but decisive victory with RIII dead
No other claimants, God onside as victory in battle, military ability proven
Acceptable and practical alternative
Strong king, stability to overcome previous instability, wanted a secure kingdom
Loyalty was rewards
Established broad support base and won people over, didn’t make mistakes of RIII
Backdated reign to 21 August, day before Bosworth
Allowed attainder of Yorkists, giving land used for patronage of others
Marriage to Elizabeth of York
18 January 1486
alliance of York and Lancaster - creating Tudor rose and ending Wars of the Roses
Advantage to Elizabeth:
Secures safety of remaining Woodvilles, married man of royal status
Reversed Act of Bastardisation - RIII used to legalise his usurpation and had implications for Elizabeth of York
Parliament agreed to reverse act and destroy all copies
Negotiated by their respective mothers, Elizabeth Woodville and Margaret Beaufort in autumn 1483
Requested by parliament December 1485 - to ensure marriage goes ahead
Married after HVII became king - not dependent on Elizabeth who had a stronger claim, and wanted to be king in his own right
Required papal dispensation - related via John of Gaunt
Came quickly - Vatican approved and HVII published it in English and publicised it
How successful was the marriage
designed to heal political divisions - but Woodvilles and Elizabeth kept in background regarding politics
Woodville influence declined during HVII reign
HVII had no brothers - less need to support others, nobility had fewer members and possessions than before and was therefore less of a threat
HVII careful to prevent ill-feeling to marriage like EIV
Margaret Beaufort was dominant, especially over Elizabeth of York and HVII himself
Resented by Elizabeth - Spanish royalty told to make fuss of queen when they came so she could favour Spain and put in good word with HVII
Provided heirs:
5 children who survived infancy
1st was boy, Arthur, heir, secured dynasty and takes pressure off, but dies 1502 at 15
Henry and Edmund - Edmund died 1503
Loss of Arthur = personal blow, both greatly distressed
Elizabeth dies trying to replace spare in childbirth with Catherine 1503 - only prince Henry left
HVII intelligence network
method to control nobles
Medieval kingship dependant on steady flow of communication between monarch and nobles
Provided king with information and advice, way to communicate his will to the people via the nobility and gentry
King could not always trust leading subjects - use of spies was well established by now, and regarded as good kingship
During Wars of Roses, important in gathering intelligence before battle
Counter espionage also used - Clarence and Warwick rebelled against EIV 1470 and sent him letters from own spies to give him false positions
1497 - HVII used scouts to keep him informed of Cornish rebellion
Gathered information about foreign courts - HVII took power due to influence of foreigners, well aware of their power
Calais was effective base - especially for Scotland and France
HVII not first to use spies - HVI 1450s, EIV paid Scottish informers to keep eye on MofA and HVI, helping him to capture HVI in 1466
HVII keen to have information about Margaret of Burgundy - key supporter of Yorkist plots against Tudor regime
Sir Richard Clifford = agent, most likely double agent
Spy network successful in helping HVII act quickly against Warbeck and Warwick whilst they were still being planned
2 innovations brought in:
1505 ciphers by Katherine of Aragon - used for sensitive information
Bonds to put nobility under financial pressure to force them to act as informers and keep their loyalty - deeply unpopular
HVII financial policies towards nobility
bonds - written obligation binding 1 person to another to perform some specified action or to pay a sum of money
Compelled nobles to behave well
Grew from earning HVII £3000 /yr 1493 to £35,000 by 1505
Recognisances - formal acknowledgement of a debt or other obligation with sureties or penalties for enforcement
Recognition that person owed crown debt, but didn’t force to pay immediately, often held against nobility to ensure compliance
Use:
Financial coercion to gain intelligence - controlled nobles via fear than cooperation and collaboration
Way of binding nobles to king and ensuring good behaviour
Bonds were payments in return for privileges
More than half peerage was obliged to pay crown as security for good behaviour
Could have more than 1 bond
Even if payments not called in, nobles lived in constant threat of losing enormous amounts of money if they offended the king
Annual sums could be demanded as instalments if noble could not pay - Lord Abergavenny 1507 unable to pay £70,000
Sign bonds to guarantee good behaviour of poorer relations, binding a whole family to the monarch
Way of controlling and punishing nobles without trial - against Magna Carta
Dependent on king’s opinion - replacement of ‘for life’ to ‘during the king’s pleasure’ for Sir Richard Empson 1507 in his grant of local offices
Showed less generosity to nobility
Careful not create overmighty subjects via patronage and did not create many new peers despite small family
Treason punished via executions and confiscation of property, even for minor involvement in plots
Unlikely to reverse attainders
HVII had reputation for avarice and lack of mercy
Edmund Dudley
lawyer, president of king’s council 1506
Linked to HVII most unpopular financial policies - disliked by many nobles
Arrested and sent to Tower shortly after HVII death
Executed on orders of HVIII 1510
Took blame for HVII policies
Comments during arrest revealed that HVII keen to make people feel insecure and dependent on good will of king
Main purpose of bonds and recognisances was to ensure control, not gain money
HVII equated financial security with power
Alternative claimants to the throne: Edward, Earl of Warwick
son of George, Duke of Clarence
1485 - 10 years old, but Yorkist blood made him candidate
Father was attainted from treason, which would normally exclude someone from inheriting, but HVII could not easily use this as he himself had been attainted for treason under the Yorkists
Imprisoned in Tower for the rest ofc his life, from 1485
1499 - accused of plotting to escape and challenge the throne with help of Warbeck
Admitted, but believed to be partly manufactured by HVII intelligence network
Beheaded November 1499
Alternative claimants to throne - Lambert Simnel and Perkin Warbeck
had no real claim to throne
Claimed to be others who had strong birthright
Simnel claimed to be Warwick
Warbeck claimed to be EIV youngest son, Richard of York, whom some claimed had escaped Tower and was still alive
Both clearly pretenders, but nonetheless received significant support from those who disliked Tudor regime
Idea that sons of York had survived was a potent political weapon against HVII
John II of Portugal
descended from John of Gaunt and first wife, Blanche of Lancaster
Claim weakened by fact he wasn’t English - less likely to get support
No serious threat
John of Pontefract (died 1499)
illegitimate son of RIII
Usually, illegitimate children barred from inheriting titles from parents, HVII own claim via Beauforts was dependent on illegitimacy
Descended from children of John of Gaunt and his mistress, Katherine Swynford
Gaunt later married her and legitimised his children, but not everyone accepted
Concerned about threat - was imprisoned in Tower until he died
John de la Pole, Earl of Lincoln
was named RIII successor when his son died
Mother was Elizabeth Plantagenet, sister of EIV and RIII
Appeared loyal to HVII and entered his service, reducing his threat
1487 - fled HVII court and joined Viscount Lovell in Flanders, where they were provided with military support by Margaret of Burgundy
Based in Ireland
May 1487 - Simnel crowned, claiming he was rightful claimant, EVI
Troops then invaded in support, defeated at Battle of Stoke where Lincoln was killed
Edmund de la Pole, Earl of Suffolk
3rd son of John de la Pole, second Duke of Suffolk, and his wife, Elizabeth Plantagenet, sister of EIV
When HVII took throne, too young to pose threat - 12/13
As he grew up, in favour of queen Elizabeth, therefore Yorkist leanings
Placed under considerable financial pressure by HVII - contributed to his flight to his aunt, Margaret of Burgundy 1499
HVII negotiated his return by threatening trade embargo on Duke of Burgundy
HVII made his position financially humiliating and so he fled court again 1501 and went to Emperor Maximilian, where he plotted invasion
HVII used spy network successfully against
Following negotiation 1506, Edmund returned and imprisoned in Tower until he
Position became vulnerable when brother, Richard de la Pole, was recognised by king of France as rightful king of England 1512
Executed 4 May 1513
Richard de la Pole
5th son of John de la Pole, second Duke of Suffolk, and Elizabeth Plantagenet, sister of EIV
Brother of Lincoln and Suffolk
1501 - fled to court of Emperor Maximilian with Edmund
Both men and their brother William, were charged with treason by parliament 1504
Later moved to Hungary
HVII tried to negotiate for return but failed
Never posed threat to HVII but did to HVIII
Context of HVII security on throne
HVII aware he would need to act quickly to ensure control
With Parliament agreement, he was able to return supporters to previous positions and reward those most loyal
Jasper Tudor, Duke of Bedford
Thomas, Earl of Derby
John, Earl of Oxford
Percy family after Northumberland released - other northern lords followed suit
Stanleys…
Lord Clifford
Potential opposition:
Northern society loyal to RIII
Nevilles - no natural ties to HVII
Preferred Clarence’s son, Edward Earl of Warwick, heir to Warwick the kingmaker’s estates
Barons living on Scottish border
James II of Scotland supported HVII invasion but could not control barons who had stepped up raids
Needed strong individual to combat - released Earl of Northumberland
HVII began to progress north to consolidate personal authority March 1486
Welcomed by Northumberland April 1486, supporters showed loyalty to HVII despite previously being loyal to RIII
Encouraged other northern Ricardians to follow suit - Sir John Coyers
John de la Pole, Earl of Lincoln - claim to throne