1/3
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Intro: Overview
ontological reduction = mental phenomena are reduced to physical phenomena in the brain
Analytic reduction = refer to the same thing but aren’t synonymous
Multiple realisability = mental states refer to multiple different physical states
Argument: provides a good argument but lacks depth and explanation
Paragraph 1: Smart (Ockham’s Razor) vs Descartes’ Indivisibility Argument
P - Smart: Ockham’s Razor
E - C-Fibres Example
A - Descartes’ Indivisibility Argument
C - Some mental are divisible - multiple personality disorder
E - Spatial vs Functional Disibility
Paragraph 2: Descartes’ Conceivability Argument vs Argument from Mental Causation
P - Descartes’ Conceivability Argument
E - Clear and distinct ideas + Leibniz’s Law
A - Argument from mental causation - merely distinct concepts
C - Response on how mind-brain solves mental causation
E - Putnam: correlation rather than identity
Paragraph 3: Multiple Realisability Argument vs Isomorphic Causation + Qualia
P - Multiple Realisability Argument
E - Brain Plasticity Example
A - Argument from isomorphic causation when labelling experiences
C - Difference between child + adult brains - physical changes
E - Putnam forgets the qualia of pain