1/227
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Adult age groups
Older adults: 65+
Young old: 65-74
Old old: 75-84
Oldest old: 85+
life expectancy
average number of life (in years) individuals have remaining at particular age
predicts how long they’ll live
life span
average duration of life for member of species (more general); whole duration of life
maximum life span
longest recorded period of time between birth and death for an individual member of species
ex. human lived to 122 years old so Maximum life span for humans is 122
rectangularization of mortality curve
mortality curve = line graph (y-axis = % of people still alive and x-axis = age in years)
rectangularization over the course of the 1900s the curve wet from dialog to looking like a rectangle → caused by medicine, hygiene, infrastructure, decreased infant mortality, better education about health
growth of 65+ age group
population of older adults from 1920s-2020
In 1920 older adults made up about 5 million but in 2020 older adults made up about 55 million
caused by improvement in healthcare/medicine, larger population, birthing rates
population pyramid by sex and age
helps us understand age and sex distribution at a snap shot in time or how long they’ll live
baby boom: rise in births after soldieries came back home after world war 2: 1946-1964 → population significantly increased
male and female populations by age
around 35-39 there is a shift from having more males to more females
higher mortality rates in older men - risk taking behaviors in younger men, health problems, ect.
estrogen has protective effect for females
more males when young because they die off sooner (including miscarriages) → keep more equal balances of sexes later in life
diversity index
likelihood that two people chosen at random from given population will be of different racial and ethnic groups
if value is close to 100 → almost everyone is from different groups
useful for understanding diversity
older adults with disability
43% of women and 40% of men
increased number in women → menopause (decreased bone density) and women live longer so older overall age group
why has life expectancy risen?
improved medical care
improved nutirtion
decreased infant and child mortality rate
decreased deaths earlier in life (especially women giving birth)
better treatments for diseases and better prevention efforts
population is better educated about health
consequences of people living longer
personal: find resources to care for loved ones, more time to enjoy with loved ones, more need to plan for retirement, career opportunities
social: opportunities and benefits and responsibilities
more careers: geriatric medicine, gerontology, human factors and technology, experimental psychology, skilled nursing homework, economics, policy/politics/law, education
biopsychosocial perspective
perspective of development that is the complex interaction of biological, psychological and social processes
not simple, straightforward progression through time that can be linked to passing of time
principles: changes are continuous, only survivors grow old, individuality matters, normal aging differs from diseases
continuity principle of biopsychosocial perspective
the changes the people experience later in adulthood build on the experiences they had in their earlier years of life without considering the year proceeding them
over time you don’t change instantaneously
people only see you in the current moment - don’t know what they were like in your earlier years
survivors principle of biopsychosocial perspective
people who live to old age are the ones who managed to avoid the many threats that could have caused their deaths at earlier ages
survivors managed to avoid random causes → more likely to take care of themselves and avoid risky behaviors
may have inherited good genes, managed to maintain physical abilities, cognitive and emotional health and have a good support system
Individuality principle of biopsychosocial perspective
as people age they become increasingly different from each other which brings bigger differences in people’s physical functioning, psychological performance, relationships, interest in work, economic security and personality
does not mean people start out exactly the same when they’re young
interindividual differences
differences between people
influences the course of their lives
intra-individual differences
differences within people
different abilities with each individual are compared
“normal aging” of biopsychosocial perspective
growing older doesn’t necessarily mean growing sicker
important for both practical and scientific reasons to distinguish between normals aging and disease
ex. healthcare providers who mistaking think the symptom of a disease is part of normal aging process won’t take power course of treatment that could alleviate suffering
developmental psychology
inter-individual and intra-indivudal differences culminate in the areas of behaviors, thoughts and emotions
chronological age
how long have you been alive based on what the calendar says
convenient and commonly used but does not account for differences with people of same age
biological age
age of individual’s bodily systems
psychology detects the rate of an individual’s aging including performance of various bodily systems and changes at cellular level
psychological age
individuals performance on measures such as reaction, time, memory, earning ability and intelligence
preformance compared with those of other adults and scaled accordingly
includes subjective age - age that a person feels
social age
calculated by evaluating people compared to typical ages expected for people at certain options in their life, usually related to family and work roles
the effects of a person’s exposure to a changing environment
functional age
based on performance rather than chronological age
better than biological, psychological and social age
helps provide understanding of person’s true characteristics and abilities
normative age-graded influence
experiences linked to age; experienced by most adults of every generation
lead people to chose experiences that their culture and historical period attach to certain ages or points in their life span
normative history-graded influences
experiences that result from historical events or experiences that result from historical events or experiences; explain similarities and differences between groups of people
includes culture and cohorts
events that occur to everyone with a certain culture or geopolitical unit
non normative life events
experiences that are unique to an individual or small group
off time events - death of spouse early in life or inheritance of enough money to retire at 40
what influences development
genes and environment
including Normative age-graded influence, Normative history-graded influences, Nonnormative life events
lifespan development theory
developed by Erik Erickson (one of the first people studying development) and takes entire lifespan into account
longitudinal studies - lifelong, multidirectional, combination of gains and losses, plastic, historically embedded, contextual and multidisciplinary to determine how participants change over time
the longer you live the more gains/losses you have
emerging adulthood
process that encapsulates the transition prior to assuming the full responsibilities associated with adulthood, normally the years 18-29
key social indicators in adult development and aging
age
sex and gender
race and ethnicity
socioeconomic status and income
government support
religion
Demography of aging
in the US: growing population of 65+ - trend will continue to growth of 85+
Why do we age?
telomeres: repetitive DNA sequences that serve to protect the genome from becoming degraded as DNA replicated with each cell division
we have to grow (necessary part of development)
method of adapting, age to support social groups
reproduction
grandmother hypothesis (as people get older they help the younger generations survive)
selection pressure decreases as we get older
genetic disposition to aging that is passed on
models of development
organismic model: views hereditary as the driving force of development throughout the life; changes over time occur because the individual is programmed to exhibit certain behaviors at certain ages
mechanistic model: people’s behaviors misshaped by the outside forces represented by the environment; growth throughout life occurs gradually through exposure to experiences that present constantly changing challenges
interactionist model: views the interaction of genetics and the environment to shape development; people shape their own development
plasticity in development: the course of development may be altered depending on the individual’s specific interactions with the environment; by choosing to engage in certain activities, individuals can shape the course of their own aging process
reciprocity in development
people both influence and are influenced by the events in their lives
ecological perspective of development
multiple levels of the environment that affect individuals over time (person’s immediate environment, system with most direct impact on people’s lives and large social institutions)
life course perspective of development
norms, roles and attitudes about age have an impact on the shape of each person’s life
social clock - expectations for the ages at which society associates with major life events which set the pace for how people think they should progress through their family and work timelines
activity theory: view that older adults are most satisfied if they can remain involved in their social roles
disengagement theory: the normal and natural evolution of life causes older adults to purposefully lose their social ties
continuity theory: decisions about staying active or disengaging are based on an individual’s personality
ageism as a social factor in the aging process
ageism: set of beliefs, attitudes, social institutions and acts that discriminate individuals or groups based on chronological age
aging can have a positive spin but is still the harmful overgeneralization of an entire group of people who share the same characteristics
makes adults feel lonely
terror management theory - though of dying fill people with panic and dread so they engage in defense mechanism
modernization hypothesis: increasing urbanization and industrialization of western society, the lack of contribution to economic growth
Ericson’s psychosocial theory of development
key points in life, biological, psychological and social changes influences the individual’s personality
change in individual is a progression of phrases driven by the individual’s developing body
based on epigenetic principle that states each phased unfolds according to a set order
Piaget’s cognitive-developmental theory
explains the process underlying the growth of cognitive abilities and hypothesized the existence of a set of underlying processes that allowed children eventually to achieve understanding and mastery of physical world
individuals gain mastery of their environment by enriching their knowledge (schemas), assimilation (use existing schemas), accommodation (change schemas in response to new schemas)
you know differently rather than more as you get older
identity process theory
proposed framework for understanding how individuals adapt as they navigate the many new experiences that accompany their movement through life
identity: set of schemas that the person holds about the self
identity assimilation: tendency to interpret new experiences in terms of existing views of self
identity accommodation: the process through which people make changes in their identities in response to experiences that challenge current view of themselves
multiple threshold model of change: individuals realizes that they are getting older through a stepwise process as aging related changes occur
selective optimization with compensation model
adults attempt to preserve and maximize the abilities that are of central importance and put less effort into maintaining those that are not
implies that people narrow does their range of activities, chose one and then put their efforts into becoming as good at that actively as possible
make deliberate choices about how to spend their time and energy
genes and DNA as biological theory of aging
inherited mutations (alternations in genes) can be responsible for predisposition to diseases, psychiatric illnesses and cancers
programmed aging theories
propose that aging and death are built into the hard-wiring of all organisms and are therefore part of the genetic code
ex. species have different lifespans
unrealistic that there is a single gene or small combination of multiple genes that control aging process
random error theories
assumes that aging reflects unplanned changes in an organism over time - aging is accidental by-product of other biological processes that can be slowed or halted
error theories of aging: proposed that it is the accumulation of mutations acquired over the organism’s lifetime that leads to malfunctioning of body’s cells
wear and tear theory: aging occurs as the body breaks down due to accumulation of damage over time
cross linking theory: focuses on effects of aging on the cells of the body (collagen)
free radical theory: cause of aging is due to formation of highly reactive unstable oxygen molecules; antioxidants prevent the formation of free radicals
autoimmune theory:aging is due to faulty immune system functioning in which immune system attacks body’s own cells
error catastrophe theory: errors that accumulate with aging develop as result of mutations in the mitochondrial DNA, passed down from mother
primary aging
normal changes over time that occur due to universal, intrinsic and progressive alterations in the body’s system
gradual, inevitable, happens to most people
secondary aging
changes over time leading to impairment due to disease rather than normal aging
sudden, caused by: disease, poor health habits and environmental influences, happens to only some people
Maximum lifespan theory of primary aging
most amount of time a member of a specifies can live under ideal conditions
Different species have different maximum lifespan
Random or stochastic theory of primary aging
Senescence (aging) is caused by random or unplanned damage to our DNA
Based on evidence of random damage that occurs at cellular level
Programmed or genetic theory of primary aging
Senescence is caused by information stored in DNA
Based on observation that every species has characteristic maximum life span
oxidative change - random or stochastic theory
Free radical: molecule with an unpaired electron → takes electrons from other molecules causing damage
Molecules enter into many damaging chemicals reactions like this one → when body is healthy it can resist or repair most of the reactions but as we get older its ability to resist or repair declines and primary aging results
Result of regular body metabolism, diet, x-rays and air pollutants
waste produce - random or stochastic theory
aging happens because waste products accumulate in cells over time eventually interfering in cell function
Lysosomes: organelles that envelop waste and digest it to get rid of it
when lipofusion accumulates lysosomes can’t do their job → accumulation of more waste in cell → when enough waste accumulates cell can’t do its job
Lipofusion: pigment left over from the breakdown and absorption of damaged blood cells
Pigment also called aging pigment
time-clock theory (Hayflick limit) - programmed or genetic theory of aging
Hayflick took human embryo cells and studied their in vitro → doubled in population about 50 times (entered replicative senescence where cells stop copying)
Correlation between hayflick limit and species longevity
Because every member of species if genetically similar to members of that species than members of other species → similarities due to genetics → number of time cell divides correlated with maximum lifespan → implies there is something in DNA that causes this
telomere theory of programmed or genetic aging
Telmeres cap the end of chromosomes and they wear away during DNA replication
Have repeating base pairs (meaningless strand of DNA so that when the end of DNA wears away we don’t lose meaningful sequences of DNA)
When telomeres degrade sufficiently → cell stops dividing and dies
As people get older it shortens
Researches think think this indicates there is programmed set of instructions that tells cells to stop dividing
Telomerase: enzyme that lengthens telomeres
Chemical catalyst
Experimental designs
strict, has a lot of environment → helps infer causation between variables
contains IV and DV
randomly assigns participants to groups so there is even spread of characteristics, reduces the risk of biases, better reflects the population, reduced systematic differences between groups
allows us to be sure that any differences observed on DV are due to receipt or non-receipt or treatment rather than systemic treatment
Quasi-experimental designs
almost meets criteria to be experimental design but not quite because not randomly assigned → compare groups based on pre-determined characteristics
systematic differences exist so it cannot apply to general population and say IV caused differences in DV
Indepdent variable
manipulated by researchers
dependent variable
not manipulated by researchers
cohort
period of birth
typically categorized at 5-year intervals
cohort effects: social, historical and cultural influences that affect people relevant to their age group
time of testing
measurement occasion 1, measurement occasion 2 and measurement occasion 3
descriptive research design (single factor)
just looking, not manipulating
catalogs inför about how people preform based on their age but does not rule out social or historical factors
selective attrition
the possibility develops that people who drop out of a study are not necessarily representative of the sample that was originally tested
nonrandom loss of participants can occur because of illness, death
confounding variable
variable whose effect on DV cannot be separated from the indepdent variable
may not even know it exists - ot able to measure it
single development study designs
cross-sectional study designs
longitudinal design
cohort sequential design
cross-sectional study design
people from different age groups measured on same occasion
wanted to understand age differences - growth and change with age
X-axis: year
Y-axis: age at the time of observation
Pros: Takes less time to complete study, less expensive and can see results for different ages at the same time in history - holding measurement occasion constant
Measurement occasion stays constant; age and cohort vary together and cannot separate the effect of one of them from the other (confounded with each other)
longitudinal study design
some participants measured on different ages at different measurement occasion
same participants - no groups
Pros: help with cohort effects (help constant), find differences across ages, allow us to measure true developmental change - see how they change as they age, see age as different from cohort
Cohort stays constant; measurement occasion and age vary together
cohort sequential study design
design in which at least two cohorts are compared at 2 different ages, representing the variable of cohort and age
Combine aspects of cross-sectional and longitudinal designs
Makes the most of the info we can get from both studies
Includes info from more than one cohort, age and measurement occasion
Lets us use statistical techniques to learn about all of these from the same study → our conclusions are still estimates because we cannot let them vary together in real life
Attempt to learn about age, cohort and measurement occasion at the same time
Can only look at two of these variables at the same time
sequential design
data collection strategies consisting of different combinations of the variables of age, cohort and time of measurement
time-sequential design
compares the factors of age and time of testing
Most efficient design
set of three designs manipulating the variables of age, cohort and time of testing
enables the most amount of info to be condensed into an inclusive data framework
conduct three sets of comparisons each involving a different combination of age, cohort and time of testing
cross sequential designs
compares the factors of time of testing and cohort
teases apart the two separate effects of socio-historical time on scores of participants
researchers put together all possible effects of age, cohort and time of testing
reliability
extent to which the same result is found every time a measure is used
Inter-rater reliability: if two people observe the same behavior - reliability is the extent to which they say that they observed the same thing
Test re-test reliability: if you give someone a test 3 different times - extent to which they got the same score
replicability
extent to which researchers can read published article, read methods described and com up with the same results
validity
extent to which the results we get described the actual truth/reality
Truth with capital “T”
Trying to find actual truth
All observations and descriptions probably have some amount of error because we account for biases and differences in perception
correlation
strength of relationship between two variables indicated by magnitude (distance from 0)
Further correlation value is from 0, the stronger the relationship between the two variables of interest
+: as scores increase for one variable, it will increase for the others and vice versa
-: as scores for one variable increase, it will decrease for the other
0: no pattern between variables
Cannot conclude whether one causes the other but you know they vary together
Compare pre-existing groups - no random assignment
Cannot be experimental study
multivariate correlational designs
Analyze relationships between more than two variables (looks for correlations between 3+ variables)
examines the effects of other variables that could influence that relationship
mediation vs moderation
Two ways of seeing relationships between variables
Statistical methods to evaluate relationships between variables
mediation
compares correlation between variables with and without the correlation of an intervening variable
example of mediation
years of education correlated later life satisfaction → positive strong, significant correlation (good reason to believe that this is a real association not due to chance)
Add in factor of health status → find there is significant correlation between health status and years of education and life satisfaction → find the correlation between years of education and life satisfaction is no longer statistically significant → relationship between education and life satisfaction is mediated by health status → years of education and life satisfaction are correlated with each other because of the pathway from years of education to health status and health status to life satisfaction → happens through variables of health status
moderation
tests whether a 3rd variable influences the relationship between the other two variables
takes into account a variable not predicted by another variable in the model
example of moderation
test interaction between years of education and life satisfaction → test interaction with marital satisfaction → marital satisfaction may influence life satisfaction
Tests the interaction between years of education and marital satisfaction
Marital satisfaction and years of education provide a better predictor of life satisfaction than either one of the variables alone → marital satisfaction moderates years of education and life satisfaction
Years of education x marital satisfaction predicts life satisfaction together better than separate then you can claim there is significant interaction and relationship moderated by marital satisfaction
multiple regression analysis
a number of variables become designated as predictors of performance on another variable designated as the outcome
latent variable
statistical composite of several variables
factor analysis
method that generates a set of related items, called “factors” that form a consistent pattern within the data
structural equation modeling (SEM)
technique where researchers test models involving predictive relationships that include latent variables
hierarchical linear modeling (HLM)
technique where researchers compare growth curves in the main variables of interest over time and difference between groups whose curves can be expected to differ in rates
qualitative study
approach to data collection that seeks to identity the main themes in responses that participants provide to open-ended questions
can be coded into categories
archival research
investigators derive material from existing data sources in a way that can be systematically analyzed
survey method
researchers gain responses to questionnaires from a sample that can be generalized to larger population
highly flexible and can be used to gather info from a wide range of age-related topics
may be subject to bias
epidemiology
the study of the distribution and determinants of health-related states or events (including disease) and the application of this study to the control of diseases and other health problems
can provide people with prevalence statistics (estimates of the percentage of people who have ever has symptoms in a particular period) and incidence statistics (estimates of the percentage of people who first develop symptoms in a given period
case reports
summarizes findings from multiple sources for those individuals to provide in depth analysis of particular individuals
focuses on characteristics of individual and what has influences his or her development and life experiences
focus group
group of respondents meet to discuss a particular topic
goal to develop research topics to pursue in subsequent studies
daily diary method
participants enter data at least once per day to examine day-to-day variations in measure of interests
includes variables such as happiness, perceived stress, inspirations with people, ect.
observational method
researchers draw conclusions about behaviors through careful and systematic examination in particular setting
participant observation - researcher enters into activities with respondents
meta-analysis
statistical procedure that allows researchers to combine and compare findings from independently conducted studies
time of testing
the year or period in which a person is tested
in development research it refers to social, historical and cultural influences
informed consent
participant understands the risks and benefits involved in the study after having been provided info about the study
tertiary aging
rapid loss of function across multiple areas of what a person can do
represent the impact of a disease on areas of functioning that may already be possible compromised
happens at the end of life (not necessarily at old age)
immune senescence
age-related decline in immune system functioning
decreases ability to fight disease
reflects deficiencies in cytokine (proteins that help control inflation in bodies)