theft

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/45

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 9:31 AM on 6/13/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

46 Terms

1
New cards

What is the definition of theft?

Dishonestly appropriating property belonging to another with intention to permanently deprive.

2
New cards

What are the 5 elements of theft?

Appropriation; Property; Belonging to another; Dishonesty; Intention to permanently deprive (APBDI).

3
New cards

What is appropriation?

The assumption of any of the rights of the owner.

4
New cards

Which case established that appropriation can occur with the owner's consent?

Gomez (1993).

5
New cards

Facts of Gomez?

D persuaded a shop assistant to accept a stolen cheque. Consent does not prevent appropriation.

6
New cards

Which case established that a valid gift can still amount to appropriation?

Hinks (2000).

7
New cards

Facts of Hinks?

D persuaded a vulnerable man to give her money. A valid gift can still be appropriation.

8
New cards

What counts as property under the Theft Act?

Money, goods, things in action and other intangible property.

9
New cards

Which case established that confidential information is not property?

Oxford v Moss (1979).

10
New cards

Facts of Oxford v Moss?

D read an exam paper in advance. Information itself was not property capable of being stolen.

11
New cards

When does property belong to another?

When another person has ownership, possession or control.

12
New cards

Which case established that you can steal your own property?

Turner (1971).

13
New cards

Facts of Turner?

D took his own car from a garage without paying. The garage had possession and control of the vehicle.

14
New cards

What is the test for dishonesty?

What were D's actual beliefs and would ordinary decent people consider the conduct dishonest?

15
New cards

Which case established the current dishonesty test?

Ivey v Genting Casinos (2017).

16
New cards

Facts of Ivey?

Professional gambler used edge-sorting. Supreme Court established the current objective test for dishonesty.

17
New cards

What is intention to permanently deprive?

Treating property as one's own to dispose of regardless of the owner's rights.

18
New cards

Which case established that replacing money with different money can amount to ITPD?

Velumyl (1989).

19
New cards

Facts of Velumyl?

D borrowed money intending to repay different notes and coins. This amounted to ITPD.

20
New cards

Which case established that borrowing is not usually theft?

Lloyd (1985).

21
New cards

Facts of Lloyd?

Film reels were borrowed and returned. No ITPD because their goodness and value remained.

22
New cards

What is robbery?

Theft plus force or threat of force immediately before or during the theft.

23
New cards

What are the elements of robbery?

Theft; force or threat of force; immediately before or during the theft; in order to steal.

24
New cards

Which case discusses force in robbery?

Dawson and James (1976).

25
New cards

Facts of Dawson and James?

Even minimal force can be sufficient for robbery.

26
New cards

What is burglary under s9(1)(a)?

Entering a building as a trespasser with intent to steal, inflict GBH or cause criminal damage.

27
New cards

What is burglary under s9(1)(b)?

Entering as a trespasser and then stealing or attempting GBH.

28
New cards

Difference between s9(1)(a) and s9(1)(b)?

s9(1)(a) requires intent at entry; s9(1)(b) requires the offence after entry.

29
New cards

Which case discusses entry in burglary?

Brown (1985).

30
New cards

Facts of Brown?

Partial entry into a shop window was sufficient for burglary.

31
New cards

Which case discusses trespass in burglary?

Collins (1973).

32
New cards

Facts of Collins?

Trespass requires lack of permission or exceeding permission granted.

33
New cards

What is the AR of criminal damage?

Destroying or damaging property belonging to another.

34
New cards

What is the MR of criminal damage?

Intention or recklessness.

35
New cards

Which case established the modern recklessness test?

R v G (2003).

36
New cards

Facts of R v G?

Recklessness requires that D actually foresaw the risk.

37
New cards

What is arson?

Criminal damage caused by fire.

38
New cards

What is aggravated criminal damage?

Criminal damage with intent or recklessness as to endangering life.

39
New cards

What is the AR of theft?

Appropriation of property belonging to another.

40
New cards

What is the MR of theft?

Dishonesty and intention to permanently deprive.

41
New cards

What is the AR of robbery?

Theft plus force or threat of force.

42
New cards

What is the MR of robbery?

The mens rea for theft plus intention to use force in order to steal.

43
New cards

What is the AR of burglary?

Entry of a building as a trespasser.

44
New cards

What is the MR of burglary?

Knowledge/recklessness as to trespass plus the relevant ulterior intent.

45
New cards

What is the AR of criminal damage?

Destroying or damaging property belonging to another.

46
New cards

What is the MR of criminal damage?

Intention or recklessness as to the damage.