1/48
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Problem Solving
needs a goal
subgoals to help arrive to end goal
Types of Thinking
Directed Thinking
Undirected Thinking
Reproductive Thinking
Productive Thinking
Directive Thinking
locked in
goal oriented
clear defined goal
Undirected Thinking
daydreaming
distracted
mind wandering
Reproductive Thinking
repeating proven strats
Productive Thinking
creativity
coming up with a new solution
Types of Problems
Well-defined problems
Ill-defined problems
Well-Defined Problems
goal identified
subgoals identified
operators (things that move u thru subgoals)
direct and reproductive thinking
Ill-Defined Problems
nothing is clearly defined
dioes’t know how to get to goal
undirected and productive thinking
Thondrike Law of Effect
when an action brings a reward it is stamped into brain (and repeated despite failure)
Kohler 1925
studied chimps
created problems that required productive thinking
Problem solving requires what in order to first begin solving it?
a mental representation (repping in right way is crucial)
Problem Solving Methods
Algorithm (layed out steps)
Heuristics (quick fix)
Meta-Cognition
monitoring cog processes
Right Hemisphere
process visual/spatial info
Left Hemisphere
process verbal info
Hayes 1989, Creative Products
Novel
Useful
Show of Talent
Creativity Process
Preparation (studying/learning)
Incubation (putting issue aside)
Illumination (aha!)
Verification (evaluating solution)
Aha! Experience found where in brain?
right anterior temporal gyrus
Syllogistic Reasoning (Decision Making)
assumes premises r true to make a conclusion
doesn’t use prior knowledge (can be wrong)
focus on if the conclusion is right from the premises not if the meaning is right
Syllogistic Reasoning example
All A r B (All men r elephants)
All B r C (Some elephants r plants)
All A r C (Some men r plants)
Euler Circles
circles that show relationships between diff things
A Valid Deductive Conclusion
is true if the major and minor premises r true (3 step structure)
Working Memory (cog restraint to syllogism)
limits # of alternatives considered
oversimplification
Illicit Conversion
All A r B does not mean all B r A
Belief Bias
things r more valid if they fit within beliefs (over logic)
“I agree with the conclusion, so the argument must be good.”
Confirmation Bias
tendency to search for info that affirms your beliefs while ignoring other info
“I look for evidence that supports my view.”
Myside Bias
evaluating based on own beliefs
“I argue only for my side and downplay the other.”
Positivity Bias
we evaluate others more positively than negatively
False Peculiarity
believing u r the only one with a desirable quality
False Consensus
thinking others agree w u
Expected Utility Theory
choose what gives the highest average “value” when considering both outcomes and their probabilities
Think about how good or bad each outcome is (its “utility”)
Choose the option with the highest expected utility (best average result)
Subjective Utility
subjective/ personal assessment of utility (value)
do ppl prefer small but certain win over large but uncertain win?
small but certain win
Subjective Utility Curve
subjective utility increases slowly for gains
zero to a small gain > bigger to bigger gains
subjective utility decreases rapidly for loses
Initial losses are the most painful
Subjective Probability
how likely u think smth will happen (based off experience not data)
how do we judge Subjective Probability?
long term memory
frequency of events
High probability events tend to be….
underestimated
low probability events tend to be….
overestimated
Representativeness heuristic
judge probability based on stereotypes
Gambler’s Fallacy
wing belief that future events r dependent on past ones (they r independent)
“After hitting red three times in a row, it's got to be black this time”
Fast and Frugal Heuristic
less is more info when making decision (familiarity)
System 1 Reasoning
unconscious, effortless, automatic, hot emotions
System 2 Reasoning
conscious, effortful, controlled
positive emotions encourage…
creativity
trust in others
heightened risk aversion
intuitive decision making
fear encourages…
catastrophizing
heightened risk aversion
sadness encourages….
more analyzing
indecisiveness
anger encourages…
overconfidence
no risk aversion
Somatic Marker Hypothesis
gut feeling/ intuition