POLISCI 230 Midterm

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/74

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 5:18 AM on 4/30/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

75 Terms

1
New cards

Political Legitimacy

The popular acceptance of an authority, usually a governing law or regime

2
New cards

Rule of law

rule by an established system of laws that are known and apply equally to everyone

3
New cards

procedural justice

fairness of the process by which authorities make decisions

4
New cards

Deterrence

compliance because of the certainty of punishment

5
New cards

self-regulation

compliance with law because people want to

6
New cards

Four functions of law

Social control, dispute resolution, categorization, and social change

7
New cards

Federalism

a system of government in which the power is divided and have seperate powers

8
New cards

Federalism in practice

federal - taxes, foreign/interstate commerce, federal courts, maritime laws, etc

states - generalized police pwoers, broad powers etc, majority of criminal cases

9
New cards

Social control

the ability of a group to engage in self regulation, realizing a set of common rules and enforcing them

10
New cards

informal social control

the ability of society to regulate behavior without legal authority, more common, we want to be acceptedf

11
New cards

failures of informal social control

cultural deviance/counterculture, and social disorganizationso

12
New cards

social disorganization

deviation from social norms isn’t costly because disruption of social ties (ie. residential mobility, safety, etc) prevents informal control

13
New cards

formal social control

by authorized authority figures

14
New cards

Steps of the scientific method

RQ, Literature review, informed hypothesis, results

15
New cards

Prosecutors

bring criminal cases to court and argue them on behalf of the governemnt. they have discretion over which charges to bring

16
New cards

Prosecutors are chosen by

federal - appointed by president w advice and consent by the senate
state and local - elected or hired by the elected head of office

17
New cards

initial hearing

hear charges against them

18
New cards

habeas corpus

can’t have unlawful or indefinite imprisonment

19
New cards

4th amendment rights

due process, probable cause for searches

20
New cards

5th amendment rights

jury, double jeopardy, due process, no self incrimination

21
New cards

6th amendment rights

speedy and public trial, lawyer

22
New cards

8th amendment

no excessive bail or fines or cruel/unusual punishment

23
New cards

arraignment

should the person stand trial? Most end in plea bargains

24
New cards

Force in law

when and how the legal system recognizes that police use of force becomes a constitutional ‘seizure’ under the 4th amendment

25
New cards

Terry vs Ohio

even a brief stop or restraint counts as a seizure

26
New cards

scott vs harris

a seizure happens when force or action intentionally causes someone to lose freedom of movemet

27
New cards

Tennessee vs. Garner

deadly use of force is also a seizure

28
New cards

US Sentening Reform Act 1984

Punishment should be just, reasonable, and reflect the seriousness of the crime. Act tried to avoid sentencing disparities and curtailed judicial discretioin in sentencing

29
New cards

Decisionmaker bias

People are human and tend to bring their biases to their jobs

30
New cards

Jurors and bias

similarity-lenience effect, capital cases tend to be affected by the race of the victim

31
New cards

Sentencing reforms

mandatory minimums, federal truth-in-sentencing guidelines, habitual offender laws, determinate sentencing

32
New cards

Determinate vs. indeterminant sentencing

determinate- individual cant get out by parole

indeterminate - alows some discretion (gives more power to parole board) T

33
New cards

The war on drugs

made prison sentences harsher though are being eased since 2010s

34
New cards

Four goals of punishment

retribution, incapacitation, deterrence, rehabilitation

35
New cards

state-run prisons cost a lot so

some states are now requiring legislators to consider how changees to criminal law will affect prison population and budget

36
New cards

prisons have a __ population

disadvantaged

37
New cards

Community supervision

probation and parole, maintain job/housing, drug testing, curfew, associations, sometimes halfway houses

38
New cards

Collateral consequences

legal finanical obligations, disenfranchisement, hidden sentences (like offender registries and occupational limitations)

39
New cards

1789 Judiciary Act designation of jurisdictions

Designated the differnce between concurrent jurisdiction (state courts can decide constitutional questions), appellate jurisdiction, and original jurisdiction (what goes to SCOTUS)

40
New cards

Oravec (online social shaming)

computer networking has allowed for more shaming. shame is more effective than jail sometimes. vigilante justice

41
New cards

Discretion and bias issues with police

police determine when to stop and question individuals. They sometimes violate constitutionally protected rights (like self-incrimination). they also sometimes use excessive force.

42
New cards

Horowitz (police spending time)

not much on violent crime but it’s hard to tell for sure

43
New cards

Skogan Ch3

Stop and Frisk was an organizational strategy for addressing crime — management-driven strategy. Response to percieved crime rate. Compastat is data-driven management that allows for informal control over officers. Crime is only really affected by season (sandf didnt really work)

44
New cards

Four regimes governing police use of force

any-felony rule, defense of life rule, forcible felony rule, modal penal code

45
New cards

any felony rule

any means necessary to arrest felony suspectde

46
New cards

defense of life rule

a threat to officer’s life justifies force

47
New cards

forcible felony rule

only against people suspected of committing feloniesmod

48
New cards

modal penal code

crime invovled use or threats of force AND risk that suspect will inflict bodily harm if apprehension is delayed

49
New cards

Skogan ch6

political scandal lead to reduction in stop and frisk in 2015. backlash from video of police violence. may still have dark stops. resulted in investigations, a tast force and the firing of police superintendent

50
New cards

Van Cleve (Crook County)

ethnography of Chicago Judicial system. PDs operate with norms that involve denigrating identity (mope). judges also face social pressure

51
New cards

Banks & Obrien ch7

Adversarial model and how trials are set up

52
New cards

Adversarial model

litigation includes procedural rules and in front of judges/jury. Lawyers are able to fact-find beforehand

Difference between criminal and civil (dont forget burden)

53
New cards

1994 Crime Bill

included the federal truth in sentencing laws and the violent offender incarceration grants to increase prison/jail capacity

54
New cards

Second Chance Act (2008)

funds re-entry programs for hthose leaving children to reduce recidivism. For example, education, housing, ID

55
New cards

Murakawa

Argues that the liberal elements of law and order contributed to anti-black carceral development, despite their attempts to increase fairness in policing. Tension between arbitrariness and harshness that comes with discretion

56
New cards

Miller (Halfway Homes)

IL Halfway Homes help to improve behavior of former inmates but have limited space and inmates still struggle to find employment

57
New cards

Banks + Obrien ch 3

History of our legal system (incl how it’s set up generally, court unification, and the different federal courts!)

58
New cards

court unification movement

consolidation, centralization, and empowerment since the 1950s

59
New cards

one-tier vs two-tier courts

how jurisidictions are divided up

60
New cards

limited jurisdiction vs general jurisdiction courts

general jurisdiction courts have broader jurisdiction and allow for appeals

61
New cards

intermediate state appellate courts

three judge panel and hear a lot because so many cases are appeal by right

62
New cards

state courts of last resort

ie. supreme courts. fewer cases overall, often have more discretion in choosing cases, tend to get policymaking abilities

63
New cards

district courts

federal trial courts. have both original and general jurisdiction and have magistrate judges helping them

64
New cards

FISC courts

FISA courts. secretive. patriot act.

65
New cards

state/federal court administrators

have to play politics and deal with beauracracy. Banks and Obrien ch 3

66
New cards

Asher & horowitz - how police spend their time

mostly on service callls rather than nonviolent crime

67
New cards

Order of trial

Preliminary hearing —> arraignment —> trial —> sentencing

68
New cards

Juries get

a lot of discretion. nullification. hung jury. some people want to change this since they don’t hold the same amount of policymaking mandate

69
New cards

Adversarial model

ie US and UK pits prosecutors against PDs or private attourneys and end with a judge/jury verdict

70
New cards

Inquisitorial model (ie Germany)

proactive judge that helps with the collection of evidence into a dossier accessible by the defendant

71
New cards

Crime control model

presumes guilt and prioritizes efficiency, think police/prosecutors

72
New cards

Due process model

fairness is most important. prioritizes rules of collection of evidence

73
New cards

Criminal law

culpability is intent (mens rea) and conduct of offenders

74
New cards

misdemeanors

less serious. fines or incarceration of a year or lessfel

75
New cards

felonies

more serious crimes, higher fines and longer incarceration.