1/26
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Influence on Augustine: Manichaeism
suffering caused by lower power, not higher (Satan)
2 souls: higher desires God, lower desires evil
Physical world a battle between Light and Darkness
The soul is Light, trapped in a material body- must be liberated but lower soul craves material pleasures- resist through prayer + abstinence
Influenced views on concupsicence + lust
Platonism (differed from Plato but admirers)
some human minds could contemplate God- ascend from material existence- the material world leads to evil and suffering
Truth/wisdom/happiness achieved when soul separates from material influence
Further concupiscence- ideas on the body and innate imperfection which contrasts our Will
Augustine vs Pelagius
Adam would have died even without sin
Adam’s sin only affected himself- humans are born into Adam’s pre-sin state
The human race did not”die” through Adam or rise again through Jesus’ death
Pre0Jesus, some sinless lives were led
Bible on The Fall
“Indeed it was very good”
“God created man in his own image”
Eve is created out of Adam, she is his helper
Pre-Fall Humanity
Body and soul work together in harmony
Sex a rational act based on “Go forth and multiply”- Adam and Eve married in a physical not lustful relationship- PERFECT EQUALS (logical contradiction- perfect equals but Augustine argues woman inferior)
Humans have the Will- the ability not to sin, choose between good and evil
Post-Fall Humanity: Pride
Adam and Eve sin due to their Pride- they want to be like Gid
Some angels are created with less grace so have more pride
“For ‘pride is the start of every kind of sin’”
Akrasia- the Divided Will
“half wounded”- we can recognise good, but can only do evil- “For I do not what I want, but I do the very thing I hate”
e.g. Augustine struggling with lust
Post-fall Concupiscence
people can no longer control their desires
Body not inherently sinful (it was made by a perfect God), but we are dominated by concupiscence
Concupiscence- pre/post lapsarian sex
Prelapsarian- rational act done at the bidding of the mind
sexual organs can now be active when do/don’t ant them to be- PUDENDA- genitalia are parts of shame, reminder of sinful rebellion
Inherent lust in sexual activity passes down concupiscence
“Then the flesh began to lust against the Spirit. With this rebellion we are born”- City of God
Post-Fall Humanity: Original Sin
DOUBLE DEATH- First ‘death’ Adam’s sin kills God + humanity’s relationship, 2nd death is human mortality
TRANSMISSION OF SIN- Adam’s sin passed to descendants like a bad tree’s rotten fruit- “all seminally present in the loins of Adam”
The Doctor of Grace
Grace is:
God’s love and mercy
Can give Christians moral guidance
Human’s don’t deserve grace tjrough merit
Encourages the soul to praise God
CAN TRANSFORM THE WILL + OVERCOME HUMAN PRIDE
Seen in Jesus’ sacrifice + the Holy Spirit
“In Adam all die, but in Christ all will be made alive”
Augustine: Grace
God’s generous, undeserved and free act of love- EXPRESSED IN GIVING JESUS TO RESTORE HUMANITY
Salvation only possible through divine grace
Grace not earned, humans don’t deserve it
Summum Bonum: The Highest Good
compares to Platonic idea of Form of the Good
“Highest good” can be achieved by those who devote their hearts to God- only those God has chosen through grace
Happiness in our lives TEMPORARY, can’t compare to eternal happiness of being in God’s presence
Augustine: Predestination
God has ordained all that will happen- especially who will receive salvation
Pride makes us assume “we are the ones who choose God or that God chooses us”- faith is caused by God’s grace
Double Predestination- God chooses heaven or hell
Henry Chadwick
Supports Augustinian grace and salvation
Strength is “overhwleming consciousness of human dependence, awe and reverence [of] God”
The Second Vatican Council
Since the Fall, “man is split within himself”
“But the Lord himself came to free and strengthen man […] for sin has diminished man, blocking his path to fulfillment”
Augustine: Free Will
changing ideas iver time- earlier, argued sin was the failure to do good
Later- humans couldn’t overcome sin through reason/ self control
Humans are inevitably drawn to sin
PESSIMISTIC, damns humanity
Post-Fall Men and Women
“Even before her sin woman had been made to be ruled by her husband and to be submissive”
Technically ‘through love’ “but St Paul does not permit a woman to rule over a man”
“If this order is not maintained, nature will be corrupted still more”
“I cannot think of any reason for woman’s being made as man’s helper if we dismiss the reason of procreation”- men make better conversation
Julian of Eclanum
Augustine brings Manicheain thoughts into the Church
grace erfects nature but nature cannot inherently be evil as it was made by God
Confusing Original Sin and concupiscence- sex itself not always inherently sinful
Peter Brown (on Julian of Eclanum)
Augustine’s understanding of sex influenced by his years of sexual ‘immorality’ (not his words)
“The secual impulse […] is ordained by God”- cannot have sex without the impulse
Dawkins on Augustine
heavily flawed scientific understanding- homunculus theory, no understanding of genetics
Humans cannot be descended from 2 people
We can’t even look at the Fall symbolically, because it leaves Xianity with an unjustified obsession with sin, guilt and repressed sexuality
Not ethical to “condemn every child […] to inherit the sin of a remote ancestor”
Pinker on Augustine
Humanity has developed reason in the post-Enlightenment age
Acceptance of the HUMANITARIAN PRICIPLE- mutual cooperation, rational negotiation- can be logically discovered so we don’t need divine Grace
Changes in Western society- (supposedly)- decline in death penalty, tyranny, abuse and torture
Niebuhr on Augustine
post-Enlightenment focus on rationality has failed
Collective rejection of idea of sin → loss of awareness that actions can’t be purely ‘good’- leads to greater injustice and suffering as consequences not as carefully considered
Most readily apprent when considering groups
Human ego in thinking we can all reason our way to goodness- we should return to God to help us understand our limits and how to achieve possibilities
“It will not be perfect peace” “Divorcing themselves from […] the priblems of collective man”
Freud on sex
God is a psychological construct due to our need for a father figure
In ancient societies, this could have restrained violent tendencies
God is a sign of repressed sexual guilt
We are deeply shaped by our secual drive but we should not feel guilty- will return later in life (return of the repressed)
Use psychotherapy to channel secual impulses in a healthy manner
Hobbes: Human Nature (reported by Nigel Warburton)
low view of humanity- selfish, driven by fear of death and the hope of personal gain
we all seek power over others, even if we don’t realise
Example of locking the door when leaving the house because we know people could steal
We can only be kept in check through the rule of law and the threat of punishment
In the case of a societal breakdown, we would all follow along to survive- it would be rational to kill before we were killed- “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short”
We are kept in check by a powerful individual who has the power to punish others in a ‘social contract’
Giving up some freedoms for the sake of safety
Hobbes vs. Pinker
Pinker- too optimistuc? disregarding the cases of brutality and tyranny today- cannot outright reject human certain tendencies
Pelagius- we are “educated in evil”- it’s Augustine’s society, not human nature
Pelagius- predestination would make God unjust as humans have no agency, unlike Augustine’s claim- we must be capable of moral goodness if God commands it from us
Hobbes TOO PESSIMISTIC- Humans still have an ability to maintain control and keep reason- otherwise all society everywhere would always be broken down
Same w. Augustine- Akrasia- if that was possible we would never experience goodness or kindness/ sacrifice- GK Chesterton
Augustine and Pelagius
Pelagius- we have free will, not Akrasia- we sometimes do good through our free will, provided by God- “assisted by divine help” to merit our salvation
Why woukd God command humans to do good if they could not or if any goodness was only done by God? as if God were “unmindful of human frailty”
Augustine- “For it is God who works in you to will and to act”- so why doens’t he always if he is sometimes capable?
Unjust punishment is just unable to understand