1/31
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Week 11: What was the reign of Harold II like before the Norman conquest?
had basically been the ruler of the kingdom from mid-1050s
effective military leader - 1063 successful invasion of Wales
Edward appears to have chosen him as his successor
was more most people the recognised ruler - coins issued by 40 mints
challenged by the Norwegians under Hardrada who was allied with Harold’s brother Tostig
York made peace with the invaders but were defeated
Norman invasion successful
English had a strong capacity to defend themselves even against the military technology of the Normans but couldn’t fight two major battles
William able to draw upon trained knights from Northern France as France largely peaceful
Week 11: What problems did William face after the conquest?
native population unenthusiastic
rebellions in Dorset, Cornwall and Northumbria
response by William was to build castles in these regions
dispossession of lands from English landholders who had died e.g. Harold (Carpenter, The Struggle for Mastery)
disinheritance of many English families and other had to buy back their lands
external raids by Scandinavian kings such as Swein who attempted to support northern rebellions
Edgar the Aethling had revived his claim and received support from York, was then joined by the Danish invasion to seize the city
rebellion of Norman followers out of dissatisfaction - wanted all land for themselves by dispossessing all English landholders
Week 11: How was the kingdom pacified?
when he returned to Normandy for the first time after the conquest in 1067 there remained many English sheriffs and earls (Carpenter, The Struggle for Mastery)
this co-operation ended with the rebellions
Harrying of the North in response to Danish invasion in 1070 of Lincolnshire and Yorkshire
famine, deaths and economic destruction
Orderic Vitalis condemned William for his actions
went far beyond the norm for putting down an uprising
establishment of a network of over 1000 castles to intimidate population
Sussex ‘rapes’: almost all the county seized and subdivided into 5 districts to support new castles
didn’t want vassals to have all the land
controlled important ports
Mororum fine: collective punishment for hundreds where French settlers and soldiers killed
preserves ethnic boundaries
Week 12: what did dynastic and high politics look like?
high politics and dynastic politics the same - political and family life at the highest levels intertwining (Bartlett)
kings needed to manage their families as tensions between kings and their sons made England vulnerable
the son’s chance of success depended on their ability to build up a network of allies and followers
would need to be rewarded so royal sons needed resources
reason for Robert’s Curthose’s failure to inherit the whole kingdom - William prevented him from accessing resources to build up his own followers
Inheritance did not pass to the eldest son of the king - either their wasn’t a legitimate living male heir or they were bypassed in favour of another family member (Bartlett, England under the Norman and Angevin Kings)
integration of England and Normandy complicated politics and succession - had to be run as separate domains due to different customs and histories
Week 12: What did succession look like under William I?
William revised his succession plans on his deathbed, depriving his eldest son Robert of both kingdoms and instead giving England to William Rufus
upon the King’s death Robert remained with Philip whereas Rufus attends his father
Vitalis suggests William had no fixed plans but wanted Rufus to be crowned
writes in the voice of William I that the ‘country which is subject to [Robert’s] dominion will be truly wretched’
some suggestion that William had wanted all titles to go to Rufus but was convinced by his advisors to divide up the kingdom (English, William the Conqueror and the Anglo-Norman Succession)
a modern theory suggests that it was custom in Normandy for the eldest son to inherit his father’s patrimony (his father’s inherited lands) and conquered lands would be divided up
some evidence of this being practised but not a general rule
Robert had rebelled against his father in 1077 and taken refuge in King Philip I’s court
Week 12: What was the impact of diving the kingdom?
division unacceptable to the leading magnates who held land in Normandy and England
afraid they may lose lands in one territory - deeply attached to their Norman holdings even if they generated less money
led to rebellion against William II in favour of Robert to hold both kingdoms
organised by Bishop Odo with 6/10 greatest landholders joined e.g. Hugh of Avranches
preferred Robert as he was seen as easier to manipulate
rebellion was defeated with a series of sieges
under of Robert of Belleme the conspirators fortified castles in Kent and Sussex
awaited Robert’s invasion that never came
William besieged castles including Rochester and captured the rebel leaders
William needed to conquer Normandy to ensure long-term success
Henry had used some of the money left to him to buy Avranchin and Cotetin from Robert to become count
1091 Robert forced to recognise William’s gains and the two agreed on an inheritance pact - that if Robert died without an heir William would inherit
agreed to help Robert against Henry
1096 Robert went on crusade and mortgaged Normandy to William - so gained de facto possession
Death of William II suspicious?
Henry hurried to to seize the royal treasury and had himself crowned in 3 days
some think he was complicit but Henry did not take control of Normandy as Robert arrived back
no contemporary author accuses Henry
Week 12: How did Henry secure the throne and Normandy?
Issued a Coronation Charter - denounced his brother’s misrule and promised good government
needed to gather support against Robert
recalled Anselm who had been driven into exile
married Edith daughter of the king of Scotland and Queen Margaret (Edgar Aethling’s sister)
gain English support and establish strong dynasty
Treaty of Elton 1101 - Robert invaded and was joined by magnates including Robert of Belleme
negotiated a treaty under which Henry was to keep England and pay Robert a pension
when Robert went back to Normandy Henry eliminated his supporters
1104 Henry campaigned in Normandy and lured Robert into battle at Tinchebrai in 1106
Robert imprisoned until his death
between 1106-35 Henry spent 60% of his time in Normandy
during 1110s/20s built or refortified 15 castles on the frontiers
Robert’s son William Clito had been in custody but escaped
travelled throughout the various courts lookign for support
Henry establishing alliances through marriage
had 6 of his illegitimate daughters married to rulers on Normandy’s border lands
Matilda’s marriage to Emperor Henry V
alliances with his nephew Theobald count of Blois-Chartres
gave honours to his brothers Stephen and Henry - 1113 gave Stephen Mortain and married him to Matilda of Boulogne, 1129 Henry given Winchester Bishopric
Week 12: What succession problems faced Henry I?
death of his only legitimate son William Adelin in the White Ship disaster 1120
‘What a disaster it had been for the country that fortune had deprived him of his son’ William of Malmesbury
some observers suggest that God was punishing the victims for sexual transgressions (Henry of Huntingdon) whilst others alleged drunkenness and ‘youthful [frolicking]’ (William of Malmesbury)
next in line would be William Clito so henry had to create a new succession plan to deprive his nephew of the throne
married Adeliza of Louvain but they never had any children
his illegitimate sons such as Robert earl of Gloucester were not considered despite their prominence in the kingdom
Christian teaching against adultery resulted in a general intolerance towards illegitimate children - an idea firmly established by 11th century (McDougall, Royal Bastards)
didn’t want conflict with his other sons
Henry summoned Matilda after the death of Henry V and forced the magnates to recognise her as his heir
arranged for her to marry Geoffrey Plantagenet son of the count of Anjou
traditional enemies of Normandy
many who later switched their allegiance to Stephen cited the marriage as their reason for rejecting Matilda
the sudden marriage is perhaps best explained by the resurgence of William Clito when he was made count of Flanders
ASC suggests ‘the king did it to have peace with the count of Anjou and to have help against his nephew William’
Clito died fighting another claimant to Flanders
but Clito did receive some favourable coverage in Norman sources confirming the existence of widespread doubts about Matilda’s viability
Huntingdon called him the ‘most noble of youths’
In the years before his death Henry failed to suitably establish Matilda as his successor
Henry did not present Matilda to court and she did not remain in England upon her marriage so did not establish support (Green, Henry I and the Origins of the Civil War)
Henry was too reliant on the magnates to continue to support his plans - as he knew Matilda would not be in or near the country he needed the magnates to not endorse another candidate on his death
in 1135 Henry became estranged from his daughter - Geoffrey wanted castles on the Norman frontier from Matilda’s dowry (Hollister and Frost, Henry I)
Matilda was not in Normandy when her father died and so not near to secure the throne
Week 12: How did Stephen seize the throne?
Stephen potentially considered for the succession as Henry’s nephew before the death of Matilda’s husband made her a viable candidate (Hollister and Frost, Henry I)
had arranged Stephen’s marriage and given him land in Normandy and England
but appears to have been setting Stephen up as the ruler of a strategic location
Stephen in Boulogne when Henry died and so travelled to England quickly
first secured the support of London and then rode to Winchester to obtain the treasury
Henry of Blois as bishop aided his brother’s claim
Stephen’s position was first strong but soon entrapped in a bidding war for baronial support
like Henry he promised to reverse his predecessor’s financial policies and tried to gain support by granting barons tax exemption or new titles
made more than 1 new earls between 1136-40
Did not secure Normandy soon enough and the kingdom was secured by Geoffrey by 1144
for the magnates to obtain their lands they wanted the succession of Matilda or her son
arrest of the bishops 1139
Death of Eustace in 1153 part of what lead for Stephen’s desire for peace as was continuing the fighting to try to secure his succession (King, King Stephen)
Week 15: What were different chronicler’s views of Kings and church?
history writing provides a commentary on the rulers and gives a perspective of what those living under the kings expected from their ruler (Weiler, William of Malmesbury on Kingship)
William of Malmesbury’s histories were largely centred around kings - their deeds, relationships with barons and bishops, problems facing their reign (Weiler, William of Malmesbury on Kingship)
one of his aims to provide rulers with guidance to learn from their predecessors - prologues to Empress Matilda and Robert of Gloucester
his ideas on good kingship were traditional - focus on upholding religiosity, chivalry and protection
Eadmer’s histories have long shaped views of church-state relationship
monk on English descent based in Canterbury, raised under Stigand and Lanfranc
according to him Norman kings were guilty of imposing on the Church practices that had not existed pre-Conquest
this resulted in difficulties between Rufus and Anselm that broke down church-state relationships
Orderic Vitalis made similar claims about Flambard’s time as Rufus’ chief minister
pre-Conquest evidence disproves his idea about how vacancies were administered pre-1066
his history is shaped by the new values of the papal reform movement as well as deep resentment at oppressive taxation
Week 15: What Monastic reforms occurred in 10th century?
Anglo-Saxon period hardly any separation between church and state
duty of rulers to improve the moral condition of the nation so it could win God’s approval
monastic reforms takes off in reign of King Edgar 955
reforms directed at monastic institutions to reconstruct religious life in southern England
older monastic communities had failed or evolved into communities where monks had been replaced by secular clerics (canons)
debate over why this happened
by early to mid-10th century few monasteries remained
reforms wanted to re-establish communities in Benedictine tradition
reform of some 30-40 religious houses between 950-1020
reforms carried out in the king’s name but probably initiated by bishop Aethelwold of Winchester
condemns secular ownership of monastic houses
when many resisted the reforms royal agents brought in to deal with them
‘anti-monastic’ reaction shows these reforms relied on royal validation
More monasteries established under Aethelred II
many of these foundations justified by the need to atone for the nation’s sins
Week 15: What was the English church like under Danish rule?
Under Swein Forkbeard and Cnut the reforms were scarcely affected
Cnut raised Christian
Cnut’s Oxford Law Code 1018
wanted to preserve the same close alliance with the Church
‘let us turn zealously from sin and earnestly atone for our misdeeds’
Cnut’s proclamation 1020
drafted by Wulfstan II of York
collapses the distinction between secular and religious law
Week 15: What was the importance of the papacy in 11th century?
Papal revolution 1046-85
William I wanted to continue with the Danish system of authority over the church but new papal developments made this difficult
rise of papal reform movement - revival in authority of papacy beginning 1046
purification of the church by abolishing simony and nicolaitism (clerical marriage)
e.g. abbot Leofric of Peterborough held 4 other monasteries (Harper-Bill, Companion to the Anglo-Norman world)
problematic to laity as many who succeeded to their father’s offices were unsuitable and believed God would withhold his grace from the sacraments
with rise of Gregory VII the eradication of secular lordship over the church - including royal
Gregory believed that lay lordship was an obstacle to the reformer’s goal to return the church to its original state
Lords and kings were exploiting their role as protectors of the church to remove too much of their income
kings were blocking the reformers efforts to eradicate simony
Norman Kings might have evaded attention of papal reforms for a few decades but William I took the decision to seek papal approval for his invasion
was this made up by chroniclers to justify the conquest?
Pope Alexander provided William with means to remove Stigand whose loyalty was suspect
Stigand was a pluralist and had received his pallium from Benedict IX who was considered a simonaic
pope sent 3 legates to depose him in 1070
William I indebted to the papal reformers and dependent on them for the ongoing legitimisation of the conquest
William needed to be more discrete in church management
Archbishop Lanfranc elected - a traditional churchman who believed that bishops should promote the cause of strong kingship for the sake of stability
Pope Alexander potentially encouraging the choosing of Lanfranc (Barlow, The English Church)
trusted to manage the church in ways that would limit papal impact in England and preserve William’s lordship as far as possible
establishment of a separate system of ecclesiastical courts
allowed the bishops to establish their own courts in line with standard practise on the continent
Week 15: What was Lanfranc’s pontificate like?
Pursuit of the primacy - claim that the bishops of Canterbury enjoyed jurisdiction over all archbishoprics and bishoprics in Britain
mainly due to patriarchal authority involving delegation of papal authority
archbishop was permanent papal legate - allowed him to mediate papal directives that would’ve gone to Rome
Lanfranc would’ve severely reduced papal authority
flaws in his plan to create a Pan-Britannic ‘Patriarchate’
papacy opposed to his introduction of extra layers of jurisdiction that would reduce the amount of judicial business coming to its own court
Canons of York regarded this scheme as a challenge to their status as Canterbury’s equal
Pope Alexander delayed any decision on what Lanfranc wanted
Thomas of York forced to acknowledge Canterbury’s claim to the primacy - but the papacy continued to refuse a papal privilege
Lanfranc held 6 general councils
English abbots and bishops tried and deposed to be replaced by Normans
took steps to find genuine grounds to depose them
monastic reforms under Lanfranc implied that the English church was in a deep moral crisis
intention to preserve the purity of the monks, especially young boys given to the monasteries
another significant reform was the relocation of several sees in major cities
in Anglo-Saxon England there were no cities so bishoprics set up in small villages - so 5 had to move to larger towns
e.g. Selsey to Chichester, Elham to Thetford then Norwich
reforms demonstrated that the church had been in need of reform and that the papal reformers could be assured that the church was now in safe hands
helped legitimise the conquest as made the Normans look more righteous than Anglo-Saxons
Week 15: What was the Norman church building programme?
Normans removed physical fabric of every pre-conquest church apart from Westminster
either kept it because they simply liked the architecture or because it was built by Edward whose heir William claimed to be (Richard Plant, A Companion to the Anglo-Norman world)
William of M notes how this style of church was new in England and those that followed were built to emulate it
New structures built quickly - most completed within 20-30 years
e.g. Canterbury 1072, St Albans 1077, Durham 1093
their construction involved the erasure of pre-conquest culture
some rebuilt out of necessity such as a fire at Canterbury, some initiated by English prelates such as at Durham
Week 15: What was the church like under William II and Henry I?
Lanfranc’s policies helped to legitimise the conquest and largely succeeded in preventing the papacy from taking major interest
helped by Gregory VII’s failure when he was driven from Rome and died in exile
mid-1080s Lanfranc was exchanging letters with the antipope as if they were considering accepting him
Rufus was forced to increase his financial exploitation of the church
decline of papal reform movement allowed him to be more lax
suspended Lanfranc’s programme
Lanfranc died 1089 but was not replaced
when Rufus thought he was going to die he appointed Anselm as archbishop in 1093
had a reputation for holiness and learning
Anselm was in the country and called when Rufus fell ill, initially rejected the position but forced by the bishops who saw it as the only way to end the vacancy
Anselm fought to revive Lanfranc’s reforms
1094 king refused to allow him to hold a council for the bishops
1097 was driven into exile by the king’s financial oppression and refusal to hold councils
Henry recalled Anselm in 1100
Henry needed to gather support and so offered all bishoprics that were vacant
Anselm refused to do homage to Henry - issue of investiture brought over
Henry does allow Anselm to hold the primatial council in 1102
uses councils to promote papal reform movement - supported move to separate clerical and secular spheres
Anselm and henry wanted a way to work together after he went into exile again 1103
Henry refused to compromise on investitures but concedes after Anselm plans to excommunicate him
Anselm returned and king agreed to no longer nominate bishops and instead have free election
during Anselm’s exile the crown also took over enforcement of the canons against clerical marriage
political manoeuvre designed to prevent full implementation of the canons
Clerical marriage
papal reform for celibacy from 1000s and brought to England by the conquest (Thomas, The Secular Clergy in England)
1076 council wanted to gradually eliminated marriages - priests could remain married but unmarried priests could not marry
Anselm’s stricter attempts to enforce these rules were ignored when he went into exile with priests retaking their wives
Reform councils by 1130 asserted that clergy should not be married (Partner, Henry of Huntingdon: Clerical Celibacy and Writing of History)
Huntingdon was the son of an archdeacon and had a son
Week 16: What was Medieval monasticism?
Normans usually seen as great supporters of monastic institutions - substantial increase in number of religious houses between 1066-1154
for the established religious houses the period was a time of crisis and upheaval as they became targets for reforms and attempts to appropriate their assets
conquest transformed character of monasticism in England - introduced many new bishops who used or exploited the anomalous features of English monasticism to introduce change
from 4th century onwards ascetics regulated their way of life
covered all aspects of organisation - how abbots were appointed, structure of the day, introducing new monks
adapted for use of the secular clergy - colleges of regular canons (clergy who lived halfway between secular clergy and monks)
serve the laity but have a monastic homelife
monastic houses also began to attract aristocratic support
ulterior motives from their patrons - by associating themselves with these communities kings could enhance their popularity
inviting religious leaders to establish monastic houses could improve the economy
by 10th century most monasteries in the west were set up chiefly in order to provide ‘liturgical prayer’ for wealthy benefactors
in addition to celebrating 6 daily masses small teams of monks would devote the intervening masses and prayers to redeem the souls of benefactors
Week 16: What was the Anglo-Saxon legacy of monasticism?
the conversion of the English kings founded many large monasteries as power-houses of prayer
enthusiasm for prayer meant religious houses accumulated large amounts of land
on eve of conquest 37 Benedictine houses - top 10 enjoyed incomes of over £200 a year
Peterborough had an annual income of over £320 generated by 25 manors
supported population of 50-60 servants
relative poverty of the cathedrals - poorly provided with incomes and estates
it was not uncommon for kings to allow bishops to hold more than one see in plurality in addition to bishoprics
earlier monasteries failed in 9th century but many reformed as Benedictine houses but communities were established at 5 cathedrals
headed by a prior their communities were know as ‘cathedral priories’
most of the bishops were people who had trained as monks not secular clerics
from 960s onwards monastic values were dominant in the church
shifts from 1020s onwards when Cnut began appointing secular clerics trained on the continent
Week 16: what is the impact of the Conquest on the monasteries?
immediate impact on the established monasteries - some of the monasteries, especially those associated with the West Saxon regime or those ruled by someone whose loyalty was suspect, suffered heavily
some largely English communities of monks suffered brutal treatment at the hands of Norman abbots
at Glastonbury they refused to chant the offices in Norman fashion - abbot Thurstan called his knights who killed 3 monks
Abingdon abbey prospered under Henry I because it was ruled by Faricius who served as his physician
Henry rewarded him with 23 grants if property - no other abbey received as many grants
but building and expansion were a common cause of strife especially when money was taken from the food budget
New bishops were secular clerks and tried to appropriate the monasteries in their diocese
some bishops preferred to get rid of monastic priorities altogether replacing them with secular chapters
Anselm opposed to secularisation and established new monastic priories at Durham and Norwich
but Lincoln and Old Sarum became major cathedrals with secular chapters
New Norman lords also used their wealth to found many new monasteries as daughter-houses of continental monasteries such as Cluny
abbey at St Pancras founded 1077 by William de Warenne populated with French monks
between 1077 and middle of 12th century 20-25 Cluniac monasteries established
between late 11th century and 1154 over 90 houses of Augustinian canons were established
Week 16: How did Lanfranc deal with saints’ cults?
Eadmer writes in 1109 about how Anselm prevented the cult of St Aelfheah being suppressed along with many other English customs in Lanfranc’s reform programme
when Lanfranc questioned the merits of the reasons that the English had given for Aelfheah’s sainthood, Anselm defended the cult
Lanfranc convinced and ordered the commission of a historia in the saint’s honour
reason to believe that Eadmer is misleading us about the extent of Lanfranc’s conversion
Eadmer writing at a time when some monks at Canterbury wished to revive religious observances
Lanfranc seems to have undertaken a purge of the cathedral’s calendar and removed pre-Conquest observances
shrines containing relics of Anglo-Saxon relics that had been in pivotal positions in Canterbury cathedrals
in Lanfranc’s new cathedral completed 1077 relics were placed in boxes in the gallery inaccessible to pilgrims
marginalisation of pre-conquest cults in the cathedral
Week 16: What are examples of treatment of saints’ cults post-conquest?
two accounts by Dominic of Evesham tells of Walter the first Norman abbot of Evesham subjected some of the the relics of the English saints (Wigstan) to an ordeal by fire
Dominic doesn’t say that all the relics were tested by ordeal
other sources show that Walter sent the relics of the principal saints on tours to raise funds
relics of Credan and Wigstan survived but doesn’t say all the relics tested survived
Dominic says Walter carried out this ordeal as he was dismayed at the number of English saints’ cults
Walter’s actions can be seen as a response to the problem that the English had many saints they could claim from their own race than their Norman rulers
first Norman abbot at St Albans removed the tombs of his English predecessors and the bones of King Offa of Mercia who supposedly refounded the abbey
the Norman abbot Warin of Lyre supposed to have organised an inspection of the body of St Aldhelm at Malmesbury
but two accounts of this event
William of Malmesbury says Warin not only questioning whether the body was incorrupt but whether Aldhelm was actually a saint
William then stresses Warin’s conversion to St Aldhelm
inspection of the body of St Cuthbert at Durham cathedral in 1104
from Book of the Translation and Miracles of St Cuthbert
monks of the cathedral believed the body to remain uncorrupted but were not believed and so, led by the prior Turgot, they decided to open the coffin
discovered that the body remained intact with many relics e.g. St Oswald’s head, bones of bishops of Lindisfarne and Bede
body later inspected by other abbots but not Flambard who was bishop at the time
account is critical of Flambard - God was unhappy with his preaching over the body and caused rain so the body could be taken inside again
other examples of Normans accepting some English cults e.g. Cuthbert, Edmund in Suffolk and Etheldreda at Ely (Harper-Bill, A Companion to the Anglo-Norman World)
Week 16: What can we understand from the actions towards saints cults?
some argue that this conflict was caused by differences in religious culture between Normandy and England
but on both sides of the channel saints’ cults were sanctified in almost identical ways
in both societies saints’ cults had great political significance because they were understood as expressions of divine approval
significance of cults for medieval Christians lay in the fact that God made a person sanctified for their achievements
Normans were vulnerable to unfavourable comparisons with the English because they had a stronger track record for acquiring saints
early 11th century of Anglo-Saxon England covers 51 cult centres and 89 saints venerated
Norman saints were from earlier periods
Week 17: What was the castle building programme under the Norman like?
During Henry I’s reign the magnates began replacing motte and bailey castles with stone - built for comfort and display rather than defence
Bishop Roger of Salisbury built at least 4 castles - Devizes, Malmesbury, Old Sarum and Sherborne
at Sherborne defences such as gatehouses and curtain wall were superficial - besieged by Stephen
Roger’s nephew Alexander was bishop of Lincoln and built 3 castles at Newark, Sleaford and Banbury
Sleaford built on flat land emphasising aesthetic rather than defence
Henry of Blois built at least 6 castles despite being a monk
Wolvesley Hall was a fortified house and had second largest hall in the kingdom
many magnates reorganised the surrounding landscapes to enhance the owners’ status
took over or founded monasteries in vicinity of their castles to add religious prestige
Week 17: What was the significance of hunting and animals for the Normans?
Bishop Roger had a park at Sherborne
charter shows evidence for significant alteration to the landscape and the course of the river to create fishponds
gave a mill to the abbey to compensate them
deer that were hunted were not native and brought over from Persia - practise that had died out with Roman withdrawal from Britain reintroduced by Normans
hunting animals became a privilege through creation of private forests and parks
was established 1000 - evidence of restrictions on hunting king’s animals under Cnut
1086 25 forests - 21 royal and 4 belonged to earl of Chester
by 1200 more than 150 - 90 belonged to the king
forests created by driving people from their homes
new laws protected the king’s game and allowed the animals privileged rights over grazing of other animals
growing fascination with exotic animals - Henry I had ‘lions, leopards, lynxes, camels’ at his zoo at Woodstock according to William of M
elaborately illustrated books (bestiaries) appeared about exotic and mythical animals
Philip de Thaon’s Bestiarie written in Anglo-Norman verse and dedicated to Henry’s second wife
rulers adopted animals as symbols for their families especially lions
Week 17: How did the Normans change diet and food?
practise of holding a single large meal a day and the amount of food provided caused criticism
apparently introduced by Robert Beaumont
William of M highly critical and accuses the secular bishops of eating to excess
William just as critical of the English for excessive drinking and implies Normans took their gluttony from the English
Week 17: what intellectual changes took place under the Normans?
aristocracy were highly literate - letters show high level of usage of Latin
evidence for book collecting especially among secular bishops
Anglo-Norman literature by authors such as Philip de Thaon
wrote a didactic poem about the calculating of dates in around 1113
royal court crucial for promoting Anglo-Norman as a literary language
developed an educational hierarchy - access to literacy supported by appearance of grammar schools (lowest level of educational hierarchy)
educational centres and schools were located in cathedral cities such as Lincoln but mainly on the continent - schools of Laon regarded as the best
Henry of Huntingdon sent there and William of Corbeil
Henry I known to have attempted to gain control over the city by securing the election of his chancellor as bishop to secure access to the schools
revival of ancient astrology
William of M alleges Gerard of York read an astrological manual
tables produced by Arab astrologers arrived in England around this time
evidence of use of astrology to predict the outcome of political events - horoscope about the contenders of the throne in the anarchy
Week 19: How did Stephen succeed in his coup?
crossed to Dover immediately and made to London - secured their support and proceeded to Winchester
little hostility by the magnates
King David of Scotland invaded Cumbria and Northumbria but his support was bought - allowed to become ruler of Cumbria
recognised as king at meeting at York attended by almost all magnates
Earl Robert (Henry’s illegitimate son) performed homage April 1136
William of M attributes this to Stephen’s massive inheritance and the lack of support for a resistance
Normandy keen to have a male monarch who could be relied upon to resist the Angevins
had first opted for Theobald but abandoned him for Stephen upon his coronation
Week 19: What early difficulties did Stephen face?
Stephen was not good at taking advantage of his successes
Anglo-Saxon Chronicle complained he was too mild
often let down by his supporters
Rebellion of Baldwin de Redvers - opposition not immediately out of loyalty to Matilda but due to Stephen’s refusal to grant him an honour
Stephen besieged Exeter which had been taken by Baldwin
took so long he had to postpone visit to Normandy and cost lots of money
many parts of South and West of Normandy ravaged by Angevin raids and Stephen couldn’t stop them - had to make a truce with Geoffrey
David invaded again 1138 which undermined Stephen’s reputation
Stephen tried to ravage Scotland but ran out of supplies
eventually defeated the Scots in battle of the standard
risings in Hereford and Dunster that Stephen was unable to entirely suppress
Robert of Gloucester publicly renounced his homage and became the Empress’ leading supporter
Week 19: How did the civil war begin?
arrest of the bishops (Roger of Salisbury and his nephews) 1139
reserves of money had almost run out and encouraged to seize their castles under claims they lived a lavish lifestyle
Roger and Alexander arrested (Nigel escaped) and forced to surrender their castles and money
Alexander eventually restored to favour but Roger died in prison
allowed Stephen to replenish his revenues but alienated a core groups of supporters
Henry of Blois dismayed at Stephen’s possession of the castles as said they belonged to the Church
appointed papal legate and convened a council to investigate arrest of the bishops - conceded the king could take possession of the castles but found fault in the way they were arrested
Empress landed in England at Arundel castle and Stephen laid siege on the castle 1139
he allowed her to depart and re-join Robert at Bristol rather than take her prisoner
barons and territories defected in West and South West - established themselves in Bristol and Gloucester
Battle of Lincoln 1141 first great turning point
castle had been captured by two of Empress’ leading supporters - Earl Ranulf and earl of Lincoln
Stephen refused to flee when his followers fled and was captured and imprisoned
Matilda could’ve established herself as queen but failed to win over the Londoners
finally won their recognition but soon alienated them again over for large feudal relief
Londoners decide to join forces with Queen Matilda (Stephen’s wife) and forced the Empress to flee
Queen Matilda and Henry had assembled an army and besieged Winchester where Empress had fled
Empress abandons the city and flees
Robert captured and Empress agrees to an exchange of the King for Robert’s release
Henry of Blois holds a council that restores Stephen and excommunicates Empress’ followers
Geoffrey of Anjou attempted to conquer Normandy through sieges
invested with title as Duke of Rouen
Week 19: How did the civil war develop from 1141?
by 1142 multiple sieges against castles
1145 Stephen suppresses the rebellion of Hugh Bigod of East Anglia
1146 Ranulf II of Chester defected to Stephen and helped him besiege Bedford and Oxford
arrested for treasonable behaviour by his enemies among Stephen’s followers
turned Ranulf into an opponent rather than a powerful supporter
according to the chroniclers this period witnessed a complete breakdown of law and order throughout the entire kingdom
some grounds for doubt - fighting confined to key regions and Stephen’s regime was in control of large parts of the country
mints in south and east continued to make coins for him
rise of the earls at the expense of the sheriffs in the counties
23 new earldoms created 1138-41
no sign of regular meetings with sheriffs occurring at Westminster
Week 19: Why did the conflict decline?
significant steps towards a decisive resolution occurred 1147when both sides began to hand over the fighting to the next generation
Stephen knights his eldest son Eustace
Matilda handed over struggle to teenage son Henry
death of Robert 1147 and Matilda’s return to Normandy 1148
Henry forges an alliance with King David and attempts a raid on York but this was abandoned when Stephen arrives with knights
Stephen unable to take advantage of his success and supporters reluctant to risk more men
Henry became count of Anjou 1151 and married Eleanor of Aquitaine in 1152
gave him access to more resources
in response Louis VII of France (Eleanor’s first husband) allied himself to Eustace
August 1153 Eustace died - Stephen only fighting to ensure Eustace’s inheritance
treaty of Winchester 1153 - Stephen would recognise Henry as his heir and Stephen would rule alone until his death
Stephen’s other son William did homage to Henry
Stephen dies 1154