Unit 2 - Ideas for Research

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/11

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Last updated 7:59 PM on 4/22/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

12 Terms

1
New cards
<p><strong>Where do research ideas come from?</strong></p>

Where do research ideas come from?

  1. Your experience

  2. Casual observation of others and the world

  3. Practical problems- like homelessness

  4. Many from OTHER RESEARCH!

    1. Psychological theories

    2. Other researchers (reading works, conversations)

    3. Counter-intutitive findings (believing the opposite is true)

<ol><li><p><span>Your experience</span></p></li><li><p><span>Casual observation of others and the world</span></p></li><li><p><span>Practical problems- like homelessness</span></p></li><li><p><span>Many from OTHER RESEARCH!</span></p><ol><li><p><span>Psychological theories</span></p></li><li><p><span>Other researchers (reading works, conversations)</span></p></li><li><p><span>Counter-intutitive findings (believing the opposite is true)</span></p></li></ol></li></ol><p></p>
2
New cards

Where do ideas come from?

  • The spectrum of trustworthiness

  • Academic Literature Review

  • Old School search strategy

3
New cards
<p><strong>The spectrum of trustworthiness</strong></p>

The spectrum of trustworthiness

____________________ - The idea that some research sources are more trustworthy than others

From LEAST TO MOST trustworthy:

  • Sensational

  • Popular

  • Substantive News/general interest

  • Scholarly

<p>____________________<strong> - <span>The idea that some research sources are more trustworthy than others</span></strong></p><p><strong><span>From LEAST TO MOST trustworthy:</span></strong></p><ul><li><p>Sensational</p></li><li><p>Popular</p></li><li><p>Substantive News/general interest</p></li><li><p>Scholarly</p></li></ul><p></p>
4
New cards

Sensational sources

  • References to sources are usually obscure

  • Often in newspaper format

  • Written by variety of authors

  • Elementary, inflammatory language geared to gullible audience

  • Support from pseudoscientific sources

  • Commercially published to play to popular trends

  • Flashy, astonishing headlines

Examples: National Enquirer, Globe, Star, Weekly World News

<ul><li><p><strong>References</strong> to sources are usually obscure</p></li><li><p>Often in <strong>newspaper</strong> format</p></li><li><p>Written by <strong>variety</strong> of authors</p></li><li><p>Elementary, inflammatory language geared to <strong>gullible</strong> audience</p></li><li><p>Support from <strong>pseudoscientific </strong>sources</p></li><li><p>Commercially published to play to popular <strong>trends</strong></p></li><li><p>Flashy, astonishing <strong>headlines</strong></p></li></ul><p><strong>Examples</strong>:<em> National Enquirer, Globe, Star, Weekly World News</em></p><p></p>
5
New cards

Popular sources

  • Often have a slick, attractive appearance with many photographs

  • Sources are rarely, if ever, cited

  • Written by a wide range of authors who may or may not have expertise in an area

  • Written in simple language with short articles geared to audience with minimal education

  • Research may be mentioned, but it may come from an obscure source

  • Published commercially with the intent to entertain the reader, sell products, or promote a viewpoint

Examples: Parents, Women’s/Men’s Health Reader’s Digest

<ul><li><p><span>Often have a slick, </span><strong><span>attractive</span></strong><span> appearance with many </span><strong><span>photographs</span></strong></p></li><li><p><span>Sources are </span><strong><span>rarely</span></strong><span>, if ever, </span><strong><span>cited</span></strong></p></li><li><p><span>Written by a wide r</span><strong><span>ange of authors </span></strong><span>who may or may </span><strong><span>not</span></strong><span> have </span><strong><span>expertise </span></strong><span>in an area</span></p></li><li><p><span>Written in </span><strong><span>simple language </span></strong><span>with short articles geared to audience with </span><strong><span>minimal education</span></strong></p></li><li><p><span>Research may be mentioned, but it may come from an </span><strong><span>obscure source</span></strong></p></li><li><p><span>Published commercially with the intent to </span><strong><em><span>entertain</span></em></strong><em><span> </span></em><span>the reader, sell </span><strong><span>products</span></strong><span>, or promote a </span><strong><span>viewpoint</span></strong></p></li></ul><p><strong><span>Examples</span></strong><span>: </span><em><span>Parents, Women’s/Men’s Health Reader’s Digest</span></em></p>
6
New cards

Substantive news/general interest sources

  • Attractive appearance, usually with photographs

  • Sources are sometimes cited

  • Articles written by members of editorial staff, scholar, or free-lance writer

  • Language geared to educated audience, but no specialty assumed

  • Do not report original research, report on research in format geared to a general audience

  • Published by commercial publishers or individuals, but some from professional organizations

Examples: National Geographic, Scientific American, New York Times, The Atlantic

<ul><li><p><strong><span>Attractive</span></strong><span> appearance, usually with </span><strong><span>photographs</span></strong></p></li><li><p><span>Sources are </span><strong><span>sometimes cited</span></strong></p></li><li><p><span>Articles written by members of </span><strong><span>editorial staff, scholar,</span></strong><span> or free-lance writer</span></p></li><li><p><span>Language geared to </span><strong><span>educated audience</span></strong><span>, but </span><strong><span>no specialty</span></strong><span> assumed</span></p></li><li><p><span>Do not report original research, </span><strong><span>report </span><em><span>on </span></em><span>research</span></strong><span> in format geared to a </span><strong><span>general audience</span></strong></p></li><li><p><span>Published by commercial publishers or individuals, but some from professional organizations</span></p></li></ul><p><strong><span>Examples</span></strong><span>: </span><em><span>National Geographic, Scientific American, New York Times, The Atlantic</span></em></p>
7
New cards

Scholarly sources

  • Sober, serious look with graphs and tables

  • Reference citations always provided

  • Written by a scholar in the field or someone who has done research in the field

  • Language of the discipline, assuming a scholarly background of the reader

  • Report original research

  • Many, but not all, published by professional organizations

Examples: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Child Development, Journal of Experimental Psychology

<ul><li><p><span>Sober, serious look with </span><strong><span>graphs and tables</span></strong></p></li><li><p><span>Reference </span><strong><span>citations</span></strong><span> always provided</span></p></li><li><p><span>Written by a </span><strong><span>scholar</span></strong><span> in the field or someone who has done research in the field</span></p></li><li><p><strong><span>Language of the discipline</span></strong><span>, assuming a </span><strong><span>scholarly background</span></strong><span> of the reader</span></p></li><li><p><span>Report </span><strong><span>original research</span></strong></p></li><li><p><span>Many, but not all, published by </span><strong><span>professional organizations</span></strong></p></li></ul><p><strong><span>Examples</span></strong><span>: </span><em><span>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Child Development, Journal of Experimental Psychology</span></em></p>
8
New cards

Academic Literature Review

Source for research ideas and to support the research ideas we have developed. Even within the academic literature, there are varying degrees of trustworthiness

  • Peer-reviewed journals, some of the best have rejection rates of 90%

    • Clinical Psychology Review, Journal of Pediatric Psychology

  • Others have less rejection

    • Psychological Reports, Bulletin of Psychonomic society, Journal of Social Psychology

9
New cards
<p><strong>Predatory journals</strong></p>

Predatory journals

_________________ publish literally anything and lots of people in academia are filled with these requests to submit things/publish in these journals

  • Bottom feeders of the academic world

  • Reputable journals don’t ask authors to submit to them– its meant to be the other way around

    • People have submitted gibberish articles that make no sense or things that are clearly wrong

      • Get me off your f*ing mail list,

<p>_________________ publish literally anything and lots of people in academia are filled with these requests to submit things/publish in these journals</p><ul><li><p>Bottom feeders of the academic world</p></li><li><p>Reputable journals don’t ask authors to submit to them– its meant to be the other way around</p><ul><li><p>People have submitted gibberish articles that make no sense or things that are clearly wrong</p><ul><li><p><em>Get me off your f*ing mail list, </em></p></li></ul></li></ul></li></ul><p></p>
10
New cards

Secondary sources

__________________ - Some sources are summarizing sources, or textbooks (like intro to psych textbook into a concise summary)… can be very good

  • These sources don’t generate any of their own resource, but summarizes research done by others

<p>__________________ - <span>Some sources are summarizing sources, or textbooks (like intro to psych textbook into a concise summary)…  can be very good</span></p><ul><li><p><span>These sources don’t generate any of their own resource, but summarizes research done by others</span></p></li></ul><p></p>
11
New cards

Issues with secondary sources

__________________________ can sometimes misconstrue what primary sources say.

Example: Little Albert… -- he was classically conditioned to fear white rabbits and white rats

  • Some introductory textbooks get details wrong– some say that Little Alberts fear went away, but it didn’t go away his mother just pulled him from the experiment.

12
New cards
<p><strong>Old School Search Strategy</strong></p>

Old School Search Strategy

__________________ - Back in the day… looking in libraries

  • A good way to look for sources is to look for other sources cited in it

  • Google Scholar is a good source that generates a large collection of articles from academic literature

    • A best strategy is to look at who has cited the articles published, and look at the others who cited that article because it can be useful

<p><strong>__________________ - Back in the day… looking in libraries</strong></p><ul><li><p>A good way to look for sources is to look for other sources cited in it</p></li><li><p>Google Scholar is a good source that generates a large collection of articles from academic literature</p><ul><li><p>A best strategy is to look at who has cited the articles published, and look at the others who cited that article because it can be useful</p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p>