1/22
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
hyperphantasia— career likelihood & cons
extreme imagery, photo/life like
can be harmful: experience painful events in extreme detail (linked to PTSD)
more likely to go into creative field
aphantasia— career likelihood
lack of mental imagery,
more likely to go into math/science
dual coding theory
we have 2 distinct & interconnected ways to process & represent info
dual coding theory 2 diff systems
1st: verbal system, propositional representation
2nd: non-verbal system, depictive representation
verbal system of dual coding theory
verbal system: symbolic system, dealings with words & letters, syllables, etc
representing info as logogens (words, sentences)
propositional representation
verbal, abstract-code, amodal (no specific sensational link)
non-verbal system of dual coding theory
non-verbal system: modality-specific system, deals w/ images
representing info as imagens (mental imagery, sensations)
depictive representation & example
non-verbal, analog, modality-specific
recalling sunset you saw yesterday or a song you rlly like (both sensation-linked)
propositional theory
we only use propositional representations in our minds, don’t preserve perceptual & spatial info (refutes dual-coding)
mental imagery only comes about via epiphenomenalism— its only a byproduct
propositional representation hypothesis
all info is stored as descriptive or propositional statements (language-like)
dual-coding theory— what happens when we do mental imagery?
we bring the representation to mind— preserve perceptual & spatial info in one stream
evidence for dual coding theory
concreteness effect— we process images & physical stimuli similarly
concreteness effect explained
concrete words (table, chair) are recalled more than abstract words (democracy, justice) bc they can be represented using both verbal & non-verbal system (imagery)
3 studies that linked perception & imagery
mental rotation, mental scanning, mental scaling
mental rotation: process, important takeaways, gender’s role, utilization of brain in rotating?
ppl took longer to answer abt rotated figures that require more rotation— supports imagery linked to perception
men outperform women → reflects sociocultural influences
men vs women times’ depended on whats being rotated (doll vs sailboat)
mental rotation doesn’t strictly use R hemisphere
mental scanning: process, important takeaways
ask ppl to study image of island
if physical distance is greater btwn 2 images, will take longer to scan
links imagery & perception
mental scaling: process, important takeaways
ppl asked to imagine animals standing next to other animals (rabbit & fly, rabbit & elephant)
when imagining rabbit next to fly → perceived as bigger (physically)
also takes up more room in mind’s eye (imagery matches perception)
what did fMRI studying ppl viewing faces vs buildings demonstrate
suggests shared areas of perception & imagery in each respective region btwn viewing & imagining— same areas activated when viewing vs imagining
imagery exhibits functional specialization
what study demonstrated distinction btwn imagery & perception
blindsight patients had less area overlap btwn perceiving & imagining houses than control group (no blindsight)
what did the grid experiment prove abt how imagery affects our actions
report faster when x is where they imagined it to be
it demonstrated that imagery helps guide our perception & attention for upcoming task
von restorff effect
objects remembered better when they’re out of ordinary among common objects
diff stands out in memory
what happens when imagery group visualizes images of distressful scenario vs group that focuses on semantics
imagery group reports more negative emotions
sports training imagery
pregame mental visualization linked to better performance