Chapter 13: Community power, land use and the environment

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/223

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 8:29 PM on 5/24/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

224 Terms

1
New cards

Land use

The way land is used within local government boundaries, affecting housing, jobs, businesses, public facilities, transportation, the environment, local finances, and community politics.

2
New cards

Land

use decisions

3
New cards

Public policies affected by land use

Housing, planning, zoning, permitting, economic development, redevelopment, transportation, environmental policy, public housing, parks, roads, water systems, sewer systems, convention centers, stadiums, and public facilities.

4
New cards

Community power

The study of who actually influences major local decisions, especially decisions involving land use, economic development, housing, planning, zoning, and redevelopment.

5
New cards

Elite model of community power

In community politics, the theory that power is concentrated in the hands of relatively few people, usually top business and financial leaders.

6
New cards

Pluralist model of community power

In community politics, the theory that power is widely dispersed among different leaders in different issue areas who respond to interest groups and voters.

7
New cards

Monolithic power structure

A community power system where one small leadership group dominates decisions across many issue areas.

8
New cards

Polycentric power structure

A community power system where different leaders influence different issues, creating competition, bargaining, and shared power.

9
New cards

Elite model versus pluralist model

The elite model argues that a small group controls community decisions, while the pluralist model argues that power is divided among multiple groups, elected officials, and organized interests.

10
New cards

Direct citizen participation

The ideal that ordinary citizens directly participate in community decision making, though the chapter explains this is more ideal than reality.

11
New cards

Gaetano Mosca

Italian political theorist who argued that all societies have two classes: a ruling class and a ruled class.

12
New cards

The Ruling Class

Gaetano Mosca’s work arguing that organization naturally leads to concentrated power in the hands of a few.

13
New cards

Robert Michels

European sociologist known for the idea that organization leads to oligarchy.

14
New cards

“He who says organization, says oligarchy”

Robert Michels’s idea that organized groups inevitably develop leaders who gain concentrated power.

15
New cards

Oligarchy

Rule by a small group of people, often emerging because organizations require leaders.

16
New cards

Middletown study

Robert and Helen Lynd’s study of Muncie, Indiana, which found a community power structure dominated by the local business class.

17
New cards

Robert and Helen Lynd

Sociologists who studied Muncie, Indiana, and found a monolithic local power structure centered on business elites.

18
New cards

Muncie, Indiana

The city studied as “Middletown,” where local economic power was controlled by wealthy manufacturers, bankers, corporate managers, and lawyers.

19
New cards

X family

The powerful family in the Middletown study whose economic control helped dominate local community power.

20
New cards

Floyd Hunter

Sociologist who studied Atlanta and argued that business leaders dominated the top tier of community power.

21
New cards

Community Power Structure

Floyd Hunter’s study of Atlanta, Georgia, which supported the elite model by showing informal business influence over government and organizations.

22
New cards

Regional City

Floyd Hunter’s name for Atlanta in his community power study.

23
New cards

Robert A. Dahl

Political scientist who studied New Haven, Connecticut, and found support for the pluralist model of community power.

24
New cards

Who Governs?

Robert Dahl’s study of New Haven, Connecticut, which found that power was dispersed among different groups depending on the issue.

25
New cards

New Haven study

Robert Dahl’s study showing that community power could be polycentric, with different leaders involved in redevelopment, education, and elections.

26
New cards

Business elites

Wealthy business and financial leaders who often influence community development, land use, and economic growth.

27
New cards

Economic elites

Local leaders whose power comes from control over economic resources, especially land, real estate, banking, development, utilities, and business.

28
New cards

Political elites

Professional politicians who increasingly replaced older economic elites as major local power holders in many communities.

29
New cards

Shift from economic elites to political elites

The change in local power caused by local businesses, banks, newspapers, and factories being absorbed by national corporations, weakening local business leadership and allowing professional politicians to gain influence.

30
New cards

Local control of land use

The ability of communities to regulate land, one of the few major economic resources still controlled locally rather than by national institutions.

31
New cards

Growth machine

The idea that community economic elites share a strong interest in promoting growth because development increases land values, profits, jobs, business activity, and tax revenues.

32
New cards

Growth as shared elite value

The belief among economic elites that community growth benefits them all by increasing investment, employment, disposable income, housing development, retail activity, and local revenues.

33
New cards

Economic growth

Expansion of capital investment, jobs, business activity, housing, and land values within a community.

34
New cards

Export industries

Industries that bring wealth into a community from outside, creating a multiplier effect that can benefit the local economy.

35
New cards

Multiplier effect

The idea that export industries create additional local economic benefits beyond their direct activity by increasing jobs, income, spending, and tax revenue.

36
New cards

Growth as good politics

The idea that local politicians often support economic growth because it increases government revenue, public employment, services, campaign support, and voter approval.

37
New cards

Community responsibility

Paul Peterson’s idea that local politicians often support growth because a declining local economy hurts businesses, workers, cultural life, land values, and political careers.

38
New cards

Paul E. Peterson

Scholar who argued that policies are in a city’s interest when they improve the city’s economic position, prestige, or political power.

39
New cards

National corporations

Large companies that often replace locally owned businesses, weakening local business loyalty and changing community power structures.

40
New cards

Weakening of community loyalties

The decline in local business commitment caused when local stores, factories, banks, and newspapers are absorbed by national corporations.

41
New cards

Professional politicians

Full

42
New cards

No

growth advocates

43
New cards

No

growth movements

44
New cards

Upper

middle

45
New cards

Minority and low

income opposition to redevelopment

46
New cards

NIMBY

An acronym for “not in my backyard,” referring to residents who oppose nearby public or private projects or developments.

47
New cards

NIMBY syndrome

The tendency of people to support development in general but oppose projects located near their own homes or neighborhoods.

48
New cards

NIMBY opponents

Homeowners and voters directly affected by a project who organize, petition, demonstrate, and seek media attention to stop it.

49
New cards

Projects likely to face NIMBY opposition

Waste disposal sites, incinerators, highways, prisons, halfway houses, mental health facilities, low

50
New cards

Restricted growthers

People who support only the “right kind of growth,” often using growth management or smart growth policies.

51
New cards

Smart growth

Promotion of higher

52
New cards

Growth management

Policies designed to restrict, direct, or shape development through zoning, subdivision controls, utility rules, building permits, environmental regulations, and land purchases.

53
New cards

Unintended consequences of growth restrictions

Growth restrictions can raise housing prices, reduce affordable housing, exclude minorities and poorer residents, limit jobs, and shift population pressures to other communities.

54
New cards

Affordable housing problem

A shortage of reasonably priced housing caused partly by restrictive land

55
New cards

Metropolitan distribution issue

The idea that when one suburb restricts growth, excluded residents do not disappear; they move elsewhere in the metropolitan area, often increasing costs for other cities.

56
New cards

Planning

Local government activity that shapes public facilities, land use, community goals, development, transportation, housing, and environmental protection.

57
New cards

City planning

The original term for local government’s role in determining the location of streets and other public facilities.

58
New cards

Master plan

A city map showing the location of present and future streets and public facilities.

59
New cards

Gridiron plan

A street layout based on straight intersecting streets and squares, used in many early American cities.

60
New cards

William Penn’s plan for Philadelphia

A 1682 example of early American city planning using a gridiron street pattern.

61
New cards

Pierre L’Enfant’s plan for Washington, DC

A 1791 city plan using radial streets cutting through a grid pattern.

62
New cards

Comprehensive planning

Local government involvement in determining community goals not only in land use and physical development, but also in population growth, health and safety, transportation, the environment, and other areas.

63
New cards

Community goals

Planning priorities involving land use, population growth, health, safety, housing, welfare, education, transportation, economic development, culture, lifestyle, beautification, historic preservation, and environmental protection.

64
New cards

American Institute of Planners (AIP)

Professional organization for planners that publishes a journal and grants professional credentials.

65
New cards

Professional planners

University graduates in city planning who help prepare comprehensive plans and influence community development policy.

66
New cards

Planning commission

A citizen body appointed by local officials to help prepare comprehensive plans, hold hearings, gather citizen input, and support planning decisions.

67
New cards

Citizen input in planning

Public participation through planning commissions and hearings used to build support for comprehensive plans.

68
New cards

Advisory role of planners

Planners and planning commissions usually recommend policies, but city councils must enact plans for them to become law.

69
New cards

Influence of planners

Planners can shape community policy by initiating discussions, creating plans, setting agendas, projecting a future image of the city, and recommending development goals.

70
New cards

Opposition to planning

The argument that government planning limits property rights, increases bureaucracy, raises housing costs, delays development, restricts jobs, and interferes with market decisions.

71
New cards

Marketplace approach to land use

The view that individual property owners and market prices allocate land better than centralized government planning.

72
New cards

Zoning

Local government ordinances that divide communities into residential, commercial, and industrial zones and require landowners to use land according to the rules of each zone.

73
New cards

Zoning ordinance

A law dividing land into districts and regulating how land and buildings may be used and developed.

74
New cards

Residential zones

Areas designated for housing, such as single

75
New cards

Commercial zones

Areas designated for business activity such as stores, offices, restaurants, hotels, or retail development.

76
New cards

Industrial zones

Areas designated for manufacturing or industrial activity, sometimes divided into light industrial and heavy industrial uses.

77
New cards

Purpose of zoning

To separate incompatible land uses, protect residential property values, guide development, and implement the comprehensive plan.

78
New cards

Nonconforming use

A land use that existed before a zoning ordinance and is allowed to continue even though it no longer fits the new zoning rules.

79
New cards

Rezoning

Changing the zoning classification of a property, often requested by owners to increase property value or allow different development.

80
New cards

Public hearing

A meeting where citizens, planners, property owners, and officials discuss proposed plans, zoning changes, or development issues before decisions are made.

81
New cards

Zoning variance

An exception to the zoning ordinance applied to a particular piece of property.

82
New cards

Spot zoning

Granting special zoning treatment to a specific property in a way that may undermine the broader zoning plan.

83
New cards

Subdivision control

Regulations governing the dividing of land areas into lots.

84
New cards

Subdivision regulations

Rules governing how land is divided into smaller lots and prepared for development, including lot size, streets, sewers, water mains, parks, playgrounds, and sidewalks.

85
New cards

Plats

Plans for subdividing land and for improvements that must be submitted to a planning commission for approval before deeds can be recorded.

86
New cards

Official map

Shows proposed and existing streets, water mains, public utilities, and other public facilities; must be approved by city council.

87
New cards

Building codes

Local government regulations requiring building permits and inspections of new construction to ensure compliance with detailed specifications.

88
New cards

Building permit

Official permission required before construction begins, showing that the project must meet building code standards.

89
New cards

Building inspectors

Officials who inspect construction sites to make sure work follows building codes.

90
New cards

Housing codes

Rules requiring existing housing structures to meet minimum standards for fire safety, ventilation, plumbing, sanitation, and building condition.

91
New cards

Capital improvement program (CIP)

The planned schedule of new public projects by a local government.

92
New cards

Capital improvements

Long

93
New cards

Environmental regulations

Government rules used to control development and protect natural resources, air, water, land, historic sites, scenic areas, wildlife habitats, and public health.

94
New cards

Areas of critical concern

Land on which governments wish to halt construction.

95
New cards

Environmental impact statements

Assessments of the environmental consequences of proposed construction or land

96
New cards

Environmental departments

Separate local or state agencies that often enforce environmental rules, requiring developers to work with both planning and environmental bureaucracies.

97
New cards

Innovative planning practices

More flexible land

98
New cards

Planned urban development (PUD)

Special ordinances, usually negotiated among developers and city officials, that approve a mixed

99
New cards

Mixed

use development

100
New cards

Exaction

A fee that pays local government’s costs in connection with new development; it can be money or land given to local government in exchange for approval of land