1/25
Looks like no tags are added yet.
what are the criticisms of the LTP experiment to understand memory?
experiment is very artificial (electrical event, preparation of brain tissue)
unlikely to replicate actual behavioural experiences “unnatural stimulus delivered to an abnormal neural preparation”
HOWEVER. LTP studies do help with forming hypotheses!
factors affecting behaviour
sensory
attentional
perceptual
motivational
emotional
motor
memory
learning performance distinction
eliminating other factors that affect performance (ex. motivation and motor abilities) to determine the manipulation’s actual effect on memory/learning.
short term memory
rapid decay
vulnerable to disruption
active
long term memory
slow decay
less vulnerable to disruption
inactive state
electroconvulsive shock (and memory disruption)
previously used with psychiatric patients memory loss
tried to use to cause amnesia in animals. not super successful
storage failure
interferes with processes responsible for storing the memory (consolidation)
permanent
methods for manipulating brain function
stereotaxic surgery
genetic engineering
optogenetics
using light to regulate ion flow (using opsins)
fast acting
halorhodopsin
used in optogenetics sensitive to green light let Cl in
DREADD
designer receptor exclusively activated by designer drugs
viral vector introduces receptor, can choose to active using a synthetic ligand 🙂
gradual time scale
how do we categorize memory traces?
3 dimensions: duration, state, vulnerability to disruption
Neuroimaging, 2 categories
structural and functional
examples of structural neuroimaging
MRI, CT
examples of functional neuroimaging
fMRI, PET, EEG