1/41
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
6 Ways to Discharge Contract
Ways to Discharge a Contract
Performance ←- Executed vs. Executory
Agreement ←- Parties agree to discharge contract
Accord of Satisfaction ←- Other party accepts half performed contract completed
Covenant Not to Sue ←- Release agreement
Novation ←- Release agreement
Operation of Laws
Too much time passes
Subject of matter is destroyed
Death or incompetence of a party
Consummate contract becomes illegal
Bankruptcy
Performance
A way to discharge a contract where the parties have done everything they were supposed to do under the contract and completed the contract
Fully performed contract is discharged
Defined as:
Executed
Executory
Executed
Type of performance where both parties have fully performed the deal
Executory
Type of performance where there’s still something left to be done by one or more of the parties, and performance has NOT been competed
Accord of Satisfaction
Way to discharge a contract where an agreement is signed where one of the parties has NOT fully performed, but the other party is willing to consider the contract as completed
Other party is willing to accept half performance
Covenant Not To Sue
Way to discharge a contract that’s a type of release agreement where one party agrees to release other party from its obligations under the contract in short of fully performing it
One party may NOT be fully performed, but may pay a settlement to other party
Breach of a Contract
When party breaches a contract, you can sue and get Legal and Equitable Remedies (Promissory Estoppel)
Legal Remedy
Legal money damage (Cash) ←- Breach of Contract
Restitution ←- Give back what you got
Quantum Mervit ←- Equivalent value you would’ve gotten if contract was honored (“The Benefit of the Bargain”)
Expectation
Equitable Remedy
Something other than money damages (Breach of Contract)
Rescission/ Restitution ←- Re-send deal/ give back what you got
Reformation ←- Re-write contract
Specific Performance ←- Force other party by court to honor deal
Restitution
Someone breaches a contract where you can sue them and each party must give back what they got
Lowest measure of money damage
Legal Remedy
Expectation
Someone breaches a contract where you can sue them for anything you expected to be honored in the deal; the full value of what you would’ve gotten and more (additional costs) if contract had been honored
Largest measure of money damages
Legal Remedy
Recission
Someone breaches a contract and you cancel the deal/ resend the deal
Equitable Remedy
Reformation
When someone breaches a contract and you ask the court to re-write the contract to reflect the deal that was agreed to, NOT what the document says ←- Legitimate error in contract
Equitable Remedy
Specific Performance
When someone breaches a contract and you ask the court to force the other party to honor the deal
Preferred remedy in Land Contracts
Equitable Remedy
Sales Law
In modern era, we have created statutes to deal with contracting transactions in a business context; known as Article 2 of the UCC
Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)
A book filled with all the law merchant rules that was intended to simplify the rules
NOT a law, meant to be guidelines at first…
In modern era, states started adopting it and made it statutory law
Intent = Keeps parties out of court (Result disputes instead of filing lawsuits)
Meant to be a gap filler ←- If not stated in terms of the agreement
Law Merchant
A basic body of merchant law that tells about the rules of transacting with businesses
All merchants knew the rules of transacting
Article 2 of the UCC
Sales law that applies to a sale of goods of $500 or more, where at least one party is a merchant
Treats any kind of transaction in business as a contract ←- Emails are allowed
UCC will identify goods if NOT stated in contract
Merchant
A person or entity who deals in goods and holds themselves out as having knowledge or skill peculiar to those goods
Goods
All things moveable, in existence, tangible, and identified to a contract
Identification
Requires that the goods be in existence and specifically identified to a contract UCC to recognize it
Very loose in terms
If not in terms of the contract, UCC will tell when/ how the goods are identified
Once Identified, we know:
Who has title of goods ←- UCC imposes a warranty obligation
Who bears Risk of Loss
Who should buy insurance on goods
Can separate between parties ←- CANNOT separate in Common law
Risk of Loss
Who bears the risk of loss if the goods are damaged or destroyed
Triggered at the time the goods are identified
UCC treats all risk of loss as a Shipping Contract ←- ROL passes to Buyer when goods hit the carrier
Document of title ←- ROL passes when seller tenders document to the buyer
No document of title ←- ROL passes to buyer when the seller informs the holder of the goods of sale
Title
Possession of the title document; can state in agreement when title passes from seller to buyer
Owner ←- Common Law
Whoever has title must give a warranty to the buyer when title passes
3 things triggered with title:
Warranty of title ←- Legitimate goods
Tells when title legally passes ←- Shipping vs. Destination contract
Voidable title ←- Good faith purchaser
Warranty of Title
A warranty obligation imposed by the UCC when title passes from buyer to seller ensuring that the seller is selling legitimate goods
Automatically get warranty when title transfers from seller to buyer
Held accountable even if you didn’t know the goods you sold were stolen
Voir Vs. Trinity ←- Seller of good bears risk of loss
Shipping Contracts
Type of shipping where title of goods pass when seller places the goods in the hands of a carrier
Buyer bears the risk of loss (Must get insurance)
Destination Contracts
Type of shipping when goods are received (tendered) to the buyer at the designated destination
Seller bears the risk of loss (Must get insurance)
Must tender to buyer ←- Buyer must inspect
Tendered to the Buyer
Shipper (Seller) must present the goods to the buyer at the destination, and buyer has the right to inspect the goods before they accept it
Document of Title
UCC states that when there’s no shipment yet, look to the document of title (email, receipt), and title passes when the seller tenders the document to the buyer
Has Document of title ←- Title passes when the seller tenders the document to the buyer
No Document of title ←- Title passes the minute the goods are identified in the contract
Good Faith Purchaser (GFP)
Person must have purchased the goods with no knowledge of the impaired title to keep product as if you got a valid title rather than getting a refund
Voidable title at your discretion
Nonconforming Goods
When Buyer does NOT get exactly what they bargained for, however, it must be material to underlying product (NOT substantially similar/ the same)
If a seller ships non-conforming goods, risk of loss stays with the seller regardless of what deal says
If Buyer rejects it, but UCC deems goods conforming —> risk of loss passes to the buyer
Buyer has responsibility to minimize loss/ ensure goods are NOT impaired until Seller can take them back
Seller ships goods, then buyer subsequently discovers they are non-conforming, risk of loss passes back to seller the minute the buyer notifies the seller
Sale of Approval
Category of sale under UCC where the risk of loss stays with the Seller until the Buyer accepts the goods
Buyer wants to try product out
You believe in your product
Sale on Return
Category of a sale under UCC where the risk of loss stays with the Buyer from the point it was shipped to them until whatever was returned in the trucks if they know how may the want
If Buyer does NOT know how much they want, risk of loss stays with Buyer the whole time
Buyer is not certain of how much product they will need from the Seller and will send back whatever product that is NOT used
Right of the Buyer
The Buyer has an absolute right to inspect, before they accept
Buyer can determine whether the goods are conforming, then can accept
Right of Adequate Assurance of Performance
If the Seller is in financial distress, and the Buyer has a purchase commitment, the Buyer has the right to request the Seller provide them with proof they can meet the Bueyer’s contract
Absolute modern law, UCC rule
Seller must provide a bank statement or whatever the Buyer requests
Buyer can breach contract, if assurance canNOT be given ←- Seller canNOT sue
Right of the Seller
Seller has the rights to be paid, and have the right to adequate assurance of performance
Seller has the right to request assurance from the Buyer ←- Can sue if Seller canNOT get adequate assurance
Remedies for the Buyer
Remedies that the UCC provides:
Cover and recover the price difference + Consequential damages
Cover: Go to market and find substitute products and then sue Seller to recover the difference in price paid
Consequential damages ←- Additional costs
Buyer must take action to cover to try to limit their damages
Remedies for the Seller
Seller can sue for the value of the product based on the contract
Seller can sell product to a different buyer and recover the difference of price + unpaid portion of the contract price + incidental damages
Products Liability Law
Modern law creation where each state categorizes it differently:
Negligence: Careless in making product with a defect
Strict Liability: Defective product = All supply chain is liable
Breach of Warranty
Common Law = “Buyer Beware” ←- can NEVER sue Seller
Warranty
Under UCC when you sell goods, a buyer must get a warranty from the seller based on the type of transaction
Expressed Warranty ←- Quality, condition, description, performance
Implied Warranty ←- Created by law under UCC
Implied Warranty of Merchantability
Implied Warranty of Fitness For a Particular Purpose
Seller can disclaim all warranties ←- Do NOT have to give a warrant = “As is”
Must tell you there’s NO warranty
Expressed Warranty
The seller makes a representation about the quality, condition, description, or performance of the goods
“As Is” or “All Faults” ←- NO expressed warranty are made
Implied Warranty of Merchantability
Type of Implied warranty that’s automatic in every sale of goods of $500 or more where the merchant gives the Buyer a warranty under the UCC
States the goods that are being bought are reasonably fit for the ordinary purposes for which such goods are used ←- Comparable to similar goods on market
“Implied Warranty of Average”
Good just has to be average
Implied Warranty of Fitness For a Particular Purpose
Type of Implied warranty created by a transaction where the Seller has special knowledge or expertise about a product, and the Buyer relies on Seller’s expertise to select/ recommend suitable goods
Product does NOT live up to expectation, because it was NOT fit for the purpose it was intended for ←- Breached