1/43
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Structural assymmetries
Differences in brain size and structure across hemispheres
Enlargement of planum temporale in left hemisphere
Enlargement of anterior portion of right hemisphere
Parts of thalamus are larger on left side
Left hemisphere neurons tend to have longer dendrites than right hemisphere neurons
Functional assymetries
Differences in task specialisation across hemispheres
Language, speech, and major problem solving = left
Spatial ability, emotion, musical ability = right
Geshwid & Levitsky (1968)
Post-mortem study of 100 right-handers
Anatomical differences in planum temporale (centre of Wernicke’s area)
Larger in left hemisphere in 65% of ppts
First study to show lateralisation of language processing
Vanderauwera et al (2016)
Planum temporale symmetrical in children with dyslexia, so their language difficulties may stem from a lack of a specialised left hemisphere
Micro-level assymmetries of language-associated areas between hemispheres
Differences in anterior (Broca’s) and posterior (Wernicke’s) language association cortex
Neurons in left and right hemisphere have different distribution of dendritic branch orders
Columns spaced farther apart in left wernicke’s area
Greater long range connectivity in language associated areas of left hemisphere
Left hemisphere = speech?
90% of population show left hemisphere dominance for speech
Corpus callosum
Largest white matter structure in the brain
Made up of 250 million axonal fibres that cross from one hemisphere into the other
Primary communication highways between hemispheres
Homotopic connections
Connect corresponding regions across hemispheres
Heterotopic connections
Travel to a different region in the other hemisphere
Synchronous processing
Communication across corpus callosum enables integration of visual info from both visual fields
Inhibitory processing
When a course of action is decided, inhibitory processing may halt incompatible motor behaviour
Anterior commissure
Small band of tissue connecting hemispheres
1/10 size of corpus callosum
Connects regions of temporal lobes inc. amydala and fibres of olfactory tract
Posterior commissure
Even smaller than anterior
Carries some interhemispheric fibres
Above cerebral aqueduct at junction at junction of third ventricle
Split brain procedure
Surgically severing the corpus callosum
Myers & Sperry did first split brain experiments on cats, monkeys and chimps
van Wagenen
Severed the corpus callosum of patients with severe, untreatable epilepsy and they got better with little to no side effects
Method for testing the split-brain procedure
Primarily use visual stimuli as visual system is more lateralised than other sensory functions
Ability to communicate to one hemisphere is based on the anatomy of the optic nerve
Experimenter quickly (>200ms) presents stimulus to one visual field
Other eye can’t help because duration is too short (eye movements take 200ms)
Anatomy of the optic nerve
Info from right visual field hits left side of retina in both eyes
Visual field stays separated as it travels up optic nerve of each eye
Optic nerve divides in half at optic chiasm
Fibres carrying visual info from medial portion of retina cross and project to visual cortex of opposite hemisphere
So all info from left visual field ends up in right hemisphere
Methodological concerns for testing split-brain procedure
Identifying prior neurological damage
Accurately evaluating the extent of the sectioning
Paying attention to experimental design to eliminate cross-cuing
Cross-cuing
Occurs when one hemisphere initiates a behaviour and the other hemisphere detects that behaviour by an external cue and helps the other hemisphere
Callosal funtion specificity
Splenium is most posterior portion of corpus callosum and when sectioned, the transfer of visual, tactile and auditory sensory info is severely distrupted
Anterior part of callosum is involved in transfer of higher-order semantic info
Patient WJ
WW2 veteran who had severe seizures because of a head injury
When stimuli were flashed in right visual field, WJ verbally reported the stimuli, but not in left visual field
His hemispheres were working independently
Grammar
Rule-based systems we have for organising words in a sentence
Generative syntax
Using the rules of grammar to create a near infinite number of sentences
Lexicon
The mind’s dictionary containing all the words we know
Language and speech
Speech production is 96% left-localised
Studies of WJ show that the left brain (not the right) can understand rule-based relationships between words
Visuospatial processing
Right hemisphere good at detecting upright faces, discriminating among similar faces, and recognising faces of familiar others
Left hemisphere better at recognising one’s own face
Hemispheres and facial expressions
Only left hemisphere can trigger voluntary facial expressions
Both hemispheres can trigger involuntary expressions
Double dissociation experiment with WJ
Showed WJ faces morphed between himself and Gazziniga
Had to state whether it was himself or Gazziniga
Left hemisphere was biased toward self-perception
Right hemisphere more biased toward close others perception (but less so than left hemisphere bias)
Emotion
Right hemisphere and emotional prosody
Good at picking up emotional context of speech
Robinson et al (1988)
Asked patients with lesions to left or right hemisphere to complete Navon Letters Task (local target = small letters, global target = big letters)
Left lesions (right dominance) were slow to identify local targets
Right lesions (left dominance) were slow to identify global targets
Right hemisphere and cognitive tasks
Right hemisphere has limited integrative capacity for cognitive tasks
Theory of mind
Ability to attribute mental states to oneself and others
The TOM network is activated bilaterally
Right TPJ most importance for TOM and seems specialised for TOM functions
Schurz et al (2014)
5 brain regions in the TOM network consistently activated in past neuroimaging studies:
Medial prefrontal cortex
Precuneus
Temporo-parietal junction
Superior temporal sulcus
Inferior frontal gyrus
The interpreter
Left hemisphere appears to have specialised ability to make causal inferences and form hypotheses
This ability, known as the interpreter, seeks to explain internal and external events to produce appropriate responses to behaviour
It never admits ignorance about behaviour of the right hemisphere, it always makes up a story to fit the behaviour
Patient MSG
Negatively arousing stimuli was showed to right hemisphere
Patient denied seeing anything but was visibly upset
Left hemisphere felt the autonomic response to the emotional stimulus but had no idea what caused it
Gazziniga & LeDoux (1978)
Split brain patient shown two pictures, one to left and one to right
Asked to choose which pictures were associated with pictures lateralised to right and left side of brain
Chicken claw flashed to left, snow scene flashed to right
Chose shovel with left hand and chicken with right
When asked, said needed a shovel to clean out a chicken shed
Left hemisphere had no knowledge about why he picked the shovel, so interpreted it to produce a response consistent with the context it knew
Woolford et al (2000)
Probability guessing paradigm
Left hemisphere used frequency matching strategy - guessing one 75% of the time and the other 25% of the time
Right hemisphere maximised - guessing the same every time
Right hemisphere outperformed the left as approached task in simplest manner
Left hemisphere has tendency to search for causal events
Dichotic listening task
Used to compare hemispheric specialisation in auditory perception
Competing messages are presented, one to left ear and one to right ear
People tend to report more words presented to the right ear, consistent with left brain = language
Attention and hemispheres
Some forms of attention are integrated at the subcortical level
Other forms act independently in the separated hemispheres
Split-brain patients can use either hemisphere to direct attention to positions in either the left or right visual field
Deduplicative paramnesia
Delusional belief that a place has been duplicated, exists in two different locations at the same time, or has been moved to a different location
Limitations of laterality research on healthy ppts
Effects are small and inconsistent because intact corpus callosum
Bias in scientific review process toward publishing papers that find significant differences
Brain’s modular architecture
Brain organised into modules of functionally interconnected regions
Independent, specialised networks that perform unique functions
Advantages of modules
More economical - saves energy because the distances it sends electrical impulses over it shorter
Multiple modules can work in parallel
Makes it easier to acquire new skills
Analytic-holistic dichotomy
Left hemisphere seen as analytic and sequential
Right seen as holistic and parallel