1/20
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Marbury v Madison 1803
-supreme court has right to judicial review
-checks and balances, constitutionality of laws could be determined by Supreme Court
Brown v Board of Education 1954
-struck down separate but equal and required integration in schools nationwide
-Overturned Plessy v Ferguson, enforced by Eisenhower
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
-separate but equal, Jim Crows was constitutional
-made segregation constitutional
Schneck v US 1919
-Schneck sent to prison
-freedom of speech can be limited if such speech poses as a “clear and present danger”
Korematsu v US 1944
-president has the right to issue the executive order that sent Japanese citizens to internment camps
-Executive Order 9066 legalizes it, Ex Parte Endo ends WRC and reversed decision
Dred Scott v Sandford 1857
-Congress can not deprive a citizens of their property (5th ammendment), African Americans not citizens, Missouri Compromise of 1820 was unconstitutional
-drove the separation of north and south to civil war
Engel v Vitale 1962
-school prayer violated separation of church of state
-standard of separation of church and state were set, prayed outlawed in school
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
-congress can regulate interstate commerce
-power to federal government, makes standard for the future
Roe v Wade 1973
-constitutional right to an abortion
-4th amendment right to privacy implied for women
McCulloh v Maryland 1819
-prohibits state taxation on a federal institution
-shows power of fed govt over states
Muller v Oregon 1908
-recognized constitutionality of laws protecting female workers
-prevented employers from controlling the work space
Tinker v Des Moines SD 1969
-arm bands protesting Vietnam War
-silent activism protected under 1st amendment
US v Nixon 1974
-turn over tapes and that executive privilege does not excuse criminal activity
-proved separation of powers, presidents not above the law
NYT v US 1971
-The Pentagon Papers did not violate national security and therefore newspapers had the right to publish them
-executive trying to cover up Vietnam War
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
-criminal defendants have the right to attorney even if they cannot afford one
-protects rights of the accused
Mapp v Ohio 1961
-evidence that illegally obtained by state may not be used against a defendant in court
-4th amendment rights were upheld, protects rights of the accused
Miranda v Arizona 1966
-Police must inform the accused of their rights
-protects the rights of the accused
Munn v Illinois 1877
-federal government can regulate private industry (grain elevator)
-victory of farmers over RR companies
Citizens United v Federal Election Committee 2010
-corporations and unions can spend unlimited amounts in elections
-corporations have the same rights as citizens
Shelby County v Holder 2013
-states and localities do not need federal approval to change voting laws
-parts of the 1965 Voting Rights Act were declared unconstituional
Worchester v Georgia 1832
-Federal courts have no jurisdiction on native-sovereign land
-ruling was not enforced by Andrew Jackson