Stature estimation, perimortem trauma, and forensic taphonomy

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/71

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 9:45 PM on 4/20/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

72 Terms

1
New cards

stature estimation

final adult height is the stature

2
New cards

sources of stature variation

  • taller in the morning, shorter in the evening → can lose 1-3cm

  • overestimation in self-reported stature → driver’s license

  • Imprecision on measurement → free standing, feet together, without shoes

  • loss of height with age → especially in vertebrae

  • Cadaveric height doesn’t equal living stature

3
New cards

cadaveric height

is 2.5cm greater; loss of muscle tension upondeath; embalming process can fill joint spaces with fluid.

4
New cards

most common method for stature estimation

mathematical models or regression equations

we need to use one or more bone lengths to estimate stature

5
New cards

allometry

Refers to the growth of a part of an organism in relation to the growth of the entire organism.

  • The ability to estimate stature from long bone length depends upon the patterned and proportional relationship between the size of body parts

  • sex specific; same population variation

6
New cards

allometry disadvantages

Different regression formulae are required for different populations and for each sex.

  • Fortunately, there are many standards → trotter and gleser

  • applicable to only adults

7
New cards

regression equation

The length of a single bone is measured and entered into a regression equation.

  • available for all long bones, singularly and combined, as well as for some sections of incomplete long bones.

8
New cards

postmortem

after death; soon after death, the bone is still fresh, covered by characteristics of perimortem trauma

9
New cards

perimortem trauma

around the time of death

10
New cards

perimortem trauma characteristics

  • sharp edges (no evidence of healing) → not antemortem

  • hinging → a section of the bone bends away from the blow’s direction

  • multiple/patterned fracture lines

  • fracture angle acute or obtuse

  • staining from hematoma

11
New cards

bone modelling/remodelling

bony bridges between fragments

  • absent in perimortem and postmortem

  • present in antemortem

12
New cards

signs of plastic response

Permanent bone deformation after exceeding the elastic response limit

  • absent in postmortem

  • usually present in antemortem and perimortem

13
New cards

bone flakes

small bone fragments attached to the impact site.

  • present in perimortem

  • absent in postmortem

14
New cards

edge morphology

the relative sharpness of the fracture margin

  • smooth from healing in antemortem

  • sharp, angled, bent edges in perimortem

  • sharp, squared edges, no bending in postmortem

15
New cards

fracture colour

only relevant if the bones are buried or submerged;

  • n/a for antemortem and perimortem

  • The newly fractured surface is lighter in postmortem

16
New cards

fracture angle

angle between the cortical table and the direction of the fracture

  • acute or obtuse in antemortem and perimortem

  • right on postmortem

17
New cards

fracture texture or tactile roughness

morphology of the broken bone surface

  • smooth on both antemortem and perimortem

  • rough in postmortem

18
New cards

cortical delamination or beveling

Cleavage between the diploe and the inner/outer table.

  • present in perimortem

  • absent in postmortem

19
New cards

forensic taphonomy

The study of the body’s history since death helps us estimate the time since death and the circumstances of death

involves studying the factors affecting decomposition, dispersal, erosion, and burial, and re-exposure of organisms at and after death

involves plant damage, root etching, and fungal growth

20
New cards

taphonomy research

requires methods for recognition, search, recovery, documentation, and analysis of human remains.

  • Excavation/exhumation is an irreversible process

21
New cards

damaged and weakened bone

more susceptible to further taphonomic damage

22
New cards

External factors

abiotic and biotic factors

23
New cards

abiotic factors

involves physical, mechanical, and chemical factors

24
New cards

physical abiotic factors

temperature, moisture, oxygen, depth, coffin/shroud

25
New cards

abiotic mechanical factors

compaction, movement, freeze-thaw cycle

26
New cards

biotic factors

involves plants and animals

  • animals → microorganisms, insects, fish, amphibians and reptiles, mammals including humans.

27
New cards

Causes for forensic taphonomy

temperature and moisture, soil

28
New cards

temperature and moisture

A humid environment is the worst, as it often causes high fragmentation

A dry (arid; can be hot) environment can be good if the bones aren’t exposed to the sun, which can cause leaching and distortion

29
New cards

Soils

Acidic soils are poor for preservation → found in rainforests/tropics.

  • alkaline soils generate less damaging

30
New cards

Weathering

Process by which the original microscopic organic and inorganic components of a bone are separated from each other and destroyed by physical and chemical agents operating on the bone in situ, either on the surface or within the soil zone

31
New cards

weathering stages for the Amboseli recent bone assemblage

  1. cow mandible with initial cracking parallel to the bone fiber structure

  2. The opposite side of the same cow mandible shows flaking of the outer bone layers

  3. The bovid scapula with fibrous, rough texture and surface bone remnants is near the lower R border

  4. A part of the scapula shows deep cracking, coarse, layered structure

  5. The scapula blade shows the final stages of deep cracking and splitting

32
New cards

postmortem animal activity

very common in outdoor settings

  • 15%-46% of forensic remains cases had evidence of postmortem animal activity.

  • can cause a high degree of fragmentation and scattering of bones

  • Leaves marks that are often easy to identify → long bones ends are the first to get marrow, leaving ragged edges → claw marks and tooth marks

33
New cards

terrestrial animals

scavenging; the primary subsistence category

includes herbivores, omnivores, and carnivores

34
New cards

herbivores

mostly rodents (squirrels, chipmunks, porcupines), ungulates, and deer

35
New cards

omnivores

some rodents (mice, rats, opossums), raccoons, bears, badgers, and pigs.

36
New cards

carnivores

dogs, wolves, foxes, coyotes, hyenas, felids, weasels, wolverines

37
New cards

carnivore marks

punctures, pits, scoring, and furrows

38
New cards

punctures

holes penetrating through cortical bone

39
New cards

pits

like punctures, but they don’t penetrate through the cortical bone

40
New cards

scoring

roughly parallel group of scratch lines across the cortical surface; usually along the shaft of the bone

41
New cards

furrows

similar to scoring but deeper, usually at the ends of the bone.

42
New cards

rodents

includes voles, mice, rats, squirrels, marmots, and beavers

43
New cards

Why do rodents gnaw on bones?

To keep their incisor teeth worn down and to obtain calcium.

44
New cards

gnaw marks

striaight grooves with flat floors that come in pairs

45
New cards

How do rodent gnaw marks differ from carnivore marks?

Rodent marks have flat floors, while carnivore marks tend to have V-shaped grooves.

46
New cards

Which bones are most commonly affected by rodent gnawing?

Small tubular bones

47
New cards

How can rodent activity help estimate PMI (postmortem interval)?

Rodents typically arrive late, around 30 months postmortem or later; their late arrival indicates a more advanced stage of decomposition.

48
New cards

How can burrowing animals affect skeletal remains?

They can displace bones over long distances.

49
New cards

What types of birds are involved in scavenging remains?

Vultures, ravens, crows, buzzards, eagles, hawks, owls, and gulls.

50
New cards

What marks do birds leave on bones?

Beak or talon scores

51
New cards

What feeding pattern do birds create on joints?

A fluffy, stringy pattern from picking connective tissue.

52
New cards

What happens when animals swallow small or fragmented bones?

It causes pitting and dissolution, often exposing spongy bone.

53
New cards

Which animals may ingest bones?

Birds (e.g., owl pellets), mammals, and rodents.

54
New cards

Which insects are involved in late-stage decomposition?

Beetles, termites, ants, moths, flies, and cockroaches.

55
New cards

What is the pugilistic pose?

A “boxer’s pose” caused by heat-induced shrinkage of soft tissue.

56
New cards

Fires

Can be natural or human-made; causes heat-induced changes, like the shrinkage of soft tissue, causing a pugilistic pose.

Bones don’t burn uniformly

57
New cards

What factors affect how bones are altered by fire?

Proximity to heat, fat and water content in bone, and body fat acting as fuel.

58
New cards

Which parts of the skeleton are most vs. least affected by fire?

Axial skeleton is more affected; hands and feet are least affected.

59
New cards

What happens to the skeleton in low-temperature or short-duration fires?

Much of the skeleton survives

60
New cards

What happens in high-temperature or long-duration fires?

The skeleton can be reduced to fragments.

61
New cards

What is a cremulator used for?

To process burned remains into ash (though teeth may survive).

62
New cards

prolonged firing of fresh cranium

The idea that prolonged firing of the brain led to expansion, such that the cranium would ‘explode’ from the ‘inside-out’

not a well supported idea

63
New cards

How does bone color change with increasing heat exposure?

yellowish-brown colour → dark brown → black → grey → light grey with blue → pure white (calcined bone)

64
New cards

How does heat affect bone size?

Shrinkage increases with increasing temperatures

65
New cards

How much can bone shrink at temperatures over 800°C?

About 10–15%

66
New cards

fleshed/fresh (‘green’) bone

It burns differently from dry bone because of differences in moisture and fat content

67
New cards

fleshed/flesh bone

deep transverse fracture lines or crescents (U-shaped fractures), substantial warping

68
New cards

dry bone

fewer fracture lines (grid-like fracture pattern), little warping, lots of superficial cracking

69
New cards

Dehydration

the removal of water; 100-500 C

70
New cards

Decomposition

The organic (protein) component is lost; 200-600 C

71
New cards

Inversion

Involves changes to the inorganic (mineral) component; 500-1100 C

72
New cards

Fusion

The mineral crystals melt and coalesce; 700-1200 C