Ecology Ch.12

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/30

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 2:27 AM on 6/16/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

31 Terms

1
New cards

What are the types of “predators”?

Herbivores-feed on plants

Carnivores feed on animals

Omnivores- feed on both plants and animals

<p>Herbivores-feed on plants</p><p>Carnivores feed on animals</p><p>Omnivores- feed on both plants and animals </p>
2
New cards

What are panda's and koalas examples of?

Low competition animals

Pandas can only eat bamboo, but cannot digest the celluose to get a high amount of energy. Therefore, they need to eat a lot of bamboo just to survive. They also have no interest in mating.

Koalas are similar in that they can only eat eucalyptus leaves, but get very little energy out of it.

3
New cards

Describe Carnivores

Carnivores are generalist (polyphagous) - view any meat as edible

Typically higher N than plants

Carnivores adapt to hunt certain prey and bypass certain prey defenses.

Examples of adaptations: Jaws/ teeth, venom, poison, group feeding, persistence hunting (humans)

4
New cards

How are Chelicerata adapted for carnivore lifestyle?

Chelicerata is a group that includes horseshoe crabs, sea scorpions, and arachnids

They have legs modified for feeding

<p>Chelicerata is a group that includes horseshoe crabs, sea scorpions, and arachnids </p><p>They have legs modified for feeding </p>
5
New cards

How can lizards preying on spiders alter community structure?

Lizards that are introduced artificially can be strong enough predators to wipe out the spiders that they feed on completely.

Anything that the spiders would have controlled is now released.

This is an example of top down control.

<p>Lizards that are introduced artificially can be strong enough predators to wipe out the spiders that they feed on completely. </p><p>Anything that the spiders would have controlled is now released.</p><p>This is an example of top down control.</p>
6
New cards

How do snail herbivores structure an aquatic community?

The snail is a grazer that feeds heavily on macrophytes (rooted/large aquatic plants).

When the snail is abundant enough, it eliminates macrophytes, which shifts the whole food web from a macrophyte-based system to a plankton-based system. Phytoplankton fills the autotroph role instead.

This is another example of top down control

<p>The snail is a grazer that feeds heavily on macrophytes (rooted/large aquatic plants). </p><p>When the snail is abundant enough, it eliminates macrophytes, which shifts the whole food web from a macrophyte-based system to a plankton-based system. Phytoplankton fills the autotroph role instead.</p><p>This is another example of top down control </p>
7
New cards

How do we know that predation is a strong force?

The answer is that predation shapes morphology, behavior, and physiology across millions of years of evolution.

Prey have evolved specific adaptations to avoid being eaten and reproduce.

8
New cards

What is Crypsis?

A types of camouflauge.

Crypsis is concealment through resemblance to the background

Used by stick bugs, moths, and owls

<p>A types of camouflauge.</p><p>Crypsis is concealment through resemblance to the background</p><p>Used by stick bugs, moths, and owls</p>
9
New cards

What is Aposematic coloring?

The prey advertises itself with bright warning colors (red, orange, yellow, black) that signal toxicity or distastefulness.

Used by poison dart frogs and monarch butterflies.

<p>The prey advertises itself with bright warning colors (red, orange, yellow, black) that signal toxicity or distastefulness.</p><p>Used by poison dart frogs and monarch butterflies.</p>
10
New cards

What is mimicry?

the act performed by organisms to resemble other organisms or inanimate objects to gain an advantage in their surroundings

Batesian mimicry: a palatable species (the mimic) copies the warning coloration of a toxic species (the model). The mimic free-rides on the model's predator conditioning. Works best when mimics are rare relative to models — if mimics become too common, predators encounter enough palatable individuals to stop avoiding the pattern.

Müllerian mimicry: two or more toxic species converge on the same warning pattern. Both benefit because predators only need to learn one signal — the cost of "education" is shared across species

<p>the act performed by organisms to resemble other organisms or inanimate objects to gain an advantage in their surroundings</p><p><strong>Batesian mimicry</strong>: a palatable species (the mimic) copies the warning coloration of a toxic species (the model). The mimic free-rides on the model's predator conditioning. Works best when mimics are rare relative to models — if mimics become too common, predators encounter enough palatable individuals to stop avoiding the pattern.</p><p><strong>Müllerian mimicry</strong>: two or more toxic species converge on the same warning pattern. Both benefit because predators only need to learn one signal — the cost of "education" is shared across species</p><p></p>
11
New cards

What are the types of herbivores and what is the relevance of the Red Queen hypothesis here?

Herbivores are characterized by their degree of dietary specialization:

Monophagous — feeds on one species

Oligophagous — feeds on a few related species

Polyphagous — feeds on many species

The key point is that herbivores have been co-evolving with plants for ~400 million years, so they've had enormous time to evolve around plant defenses.

The Red Queen Hypothesis is central here: plants evolve new defenses, herbivores evolve to overcome them, plants evolve again — a constant evolutionary arms race where both sides must keep "running" just to stay in place. Neither side ever "wins" permanently

12
New cards

What are some defense mechanisms that plants have against herbivores?

  • Physical: spines and thorns slow feeding rates; leaf hairs (trichomes) interfere with small invertebrate movement

  • Chemical barriers: saps and resins gum up mouthparts; increased fiber content reduces digestibility and nutritional value

  • Mutualistic defense: ant-plant mutualisms where plants provide food/shelter and ants physically attack herbivores (e.g., Acacia and Pseudomyrmex ants)

  • Secondary compounds: alkaloids, tannins, glucosinolates, etc. — chemicals with no primary metabolic role that deter or poison herbivores

  • Semiochemicals: signaling chemicals, including volatile compounds that attract predators/parasitoids of the herbivore (indirect defense)

13
New cards

What is an induced defense?

A defense that is only present when a threat is present.

Example 1:Mussels use byssal threads to anchor themselves to substrate. When exposed to chemical cues (effluent) from blue crabs, mussels increase byssal thread production — making themselves harder to pry off and eat.

Mussels don’t produce many byssal threats all the time because defense has energetic costs.

Examples 2: when one leaf or plant is damaged, it releases volatiles that prime neighboring leaves (or even neighboring plants) to upregulate their own defenses before being attacked

14
New cards

In what environments would you expect no defense and induced defense over heterogenous defense?

No defense - If predation/herbivory pressure is very low, the cost of maintaining defenses exceeds the benefit — selection won't favor them. Also, if the prey has no natural predators (isolated populations, island species), defenses often erode over evolutionary time.

Induced defense- Heterogeneous or unpredictable environments where predation risk varies — it's better to pay for defense only when the signal says predators are actually present.

15
New cards

What two methods do scientists use to measure the effects of predation?

Predator exclusion: physically remove or block predators using cages, netting, or fencing, then compare prey populations inside vs. outside the exclusion. If prey thrive inside the cage, that's evidence predation was suppressing them. The limitation is that cages themselves can alter microhabitat (shade, airflow, prey behavior) — called a cage artifact.

Tethering: attach prey to a fixed point so they can't flee, then measure survival rates. This isolates the predation rate from prey escape behavior. Limitation: tethered prey can't use normal escape behaviors, so predation rates may be overestimated.

16
New cards

What is the prey equation?

Nh= prey density

Np= predator density

p= predation efficiency p=1 means predator always kills p<1 means that prey sometimes escapes

Nh x Np = predator encounter rate

r = rate of population increase

<p>Nh= prey density </p><p>Np= predator density </p><p>p= predation efficiency  p=1 means predator always kills  p&lt;1 means that prey sometimes escapes </p><p>Nh x Np = predator encounter rate</p><p>r = rate of population increase </p>
17
New cards

What is the predator equation?

rate of prey capture = pNhNP

c = conversation efficiency( how efficiently capture prey are converted into predator offspring)

Therefore, predator births = cpNhNp

Predator deaths = dNp

<p>rate of prey capture = pNhNP</p><p>c = conversation efficiency( how efficiently capture prey are converted into predator offspring)</p><p>Therefore, predator births = cpNhNp</p><p></p><p>Predator deaths = dNp</p><p></p>
18
New cards

What is the Lotka Volterra predator prey model?

Combines the predator and the prey equations together

What the model predicts: coupled oscillations. Prey rise → predators rise (more food) → prey fall (overhunted) → predators fall (starving) → prey rise again. The two populations cycle perpetually out of phase with each other

<p>Combines the predator and the prey equations together</p><p>What the model predicts: <strong>coupled oscillations</strong>. Prey rise → predators rise (more food) → prey fall (overhunted) → predators fall (starving) → prey rise again. The two populations cycle perpetually out of phase with each other</p>
19
New cards

What is the stable limit cycle?

The repeated oscillations between predator and prey populations.

<p>The repeated oscillations between predator and prey populations.</p>
20
New cards

What was the Gause Lab test with paramecium?

Gause used Paramecium as prey in controlled lab cultures to test the model's predictions.

The result in simple lab environments: predators drove prey to extinction, then went extinct themselves — no sustained oscillations. This contradicts the model's prediction of perpetual coexistence.

The lab was too simple; it lacked the spatial structure and refuges that real ecosystems have.

<p>Gause used <em>Paramecium</em> as prey in controlled lab cultures to test the model's predictions. </p><p>The result in simple lab environments: <strong>predators drove prey to extinction, then went extinct themselves</strong> — no sustained oscillations. This contradicts the model's prediction of perpetual coexistence. </p><p>The lab was too simple; it lacked the spatial structure and refuges that real ecosystems have.</p>
21
New cards

What happened when Gausse added a refuge and immigration?

Oscillations were maintained. However, refuge alone is not enough to sustain oscillations. It merely maintained it.

<p>Oscillations were maintained. However, refuge alone is not enough to sustain oscillations. It merely maintained it.</p>
22
New cards

What is the lynx and the hare?

The most famous real-world example of predator-prey oscillations, drawn from Hudson's Bay Company fur trade records spanning and an example of the limitations of the Lotka Voltera predator prey model.

Hare populations cycle with a ~10-year period, and lynx populations lag behind by about 1–2 years — exactly what the L-V model predicts in terms of phase offset.

However, the hare cycle is not purely driven by lynx predation. hares overgraze their food supply at peak densities, and this food depletion contributes to the crash independently of lynx.

he L-V model only includes predation as the driver of prey decline, but the snowshoe hare data shows that food supply from below (bottom-up) interacts with predation from above (top-down)

<p>The most famous real-world example of predator-prey oscillations, drawn from Hudson's Bay Company fur trade records spanning and an example of the limitations of the Lotka Voltera predator prey model.</p><p>Hare populations cycle with a ~10-year period, and lynx populations lag behind by about 1–2 years — exactly what the L-V model predicts in terms of phase offset.</p><p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal">However, the hare cycle is <strong>not purely driven by lynx predation. </strong>hares overgraze their food supply at peak densities, and this food depletion contributes to the crash independently of lynx.</p><p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal">he L-V model only includes predation as the driver of prey decline, but the snowshoe hare data shows that <strong>food supply from below</strong> (bottom-up) interacts with <strong>predation from above</strong> (top-down)</p>
23
New cards

What are the two stabilizing mechanism?

Prey refuges

habitat heterogeneity - the number of habitats

predator functional response

predator aggregation response

predator interference

24
New cards

What happened Huffaker’s 1958 experiment

Phytophagous mite- the prey feed on citrus)

Predatory mite- the predator

With just a few oranges, the prey mice would expand quickly, then quickly be driven to extinction by the predator mites

Then the predator mites would die off as well

When Huffaker increased the environment to 252 oranges and balls( more heterogeneity)

increased barriers to predator dispersal

increased prey dispersal ability (breeze)

The results were sustained oscillations and coexistence of predators and prey.

<p>Phytophagous mite- the prey feed on citrus)</p><p>Predatory mite- the predator </p><p>With just a few oranges, the prey mice would expand quickly, then quickly be driven to extinction by the predator mites</p><p>Then the predator mites would die off as well</p><p></p><p>When Huffaker increased the environment to 252 oranges and balls( more heterogeneity) </p><p>increased barriers to predator dispersal</p><p>increased prey dispersal ability (breeze)</p><p>The results were sustained oscillations and coexistence of predators and prey.</p><p></p>
25
New cards

What is a predator’s functional response?

describes how the number of prey consumed per predator changes as prey density increases

26
New cards

What is a type one functional response?

Consumption increases linearly with density

Based on random encounters used in the Lotka Voltera model

Consumption is limited by the prey encounter rate

Not really representative of nature ( ignores biological constraints like sleep, satiation, time constraints)

<p>Consumption increases linearly with density</p><p>Based on random encounters used in the Lotka Voltera model</p><p>Consumption is limited by the prey encounter rate</p><p>Not really representative of nature ( ignores biological constraints like sleep, satiation, time constraints)</p>
27
New cards

What is a type two functional response?

Consumption increases with prey density, but plateaus because of satiation or handling time

hyperbolic curve

Does not stabilize prey

Observed in many animals

<p>Consumption increases with prey density, but plateaus because of satiation or handling time</p><p>hyperbolic curve</p><p>Does not stabilize prey </p><p>Observed in many animals</p>
28
New cards

What is a type three functional response?

driven by search image formation — a learning process where predators become more efficient at detecting and capturing a prey type the more frequently they encounter it.

most effective at hunting the most common prey

stabilizing

<p>driven by <strong>search image formation</strong> — a learning process where predators become more efficient at detecting and capturing a prey type the more frequently they encounter it.</p><p>most effective at hunting the most common prey</p><p>stabilizing </p>
29
New cards

What is predator aggregative response?

when predators physically move to and concentrate in areas with the highest prey density.

Density dependent selection by letting less dense patches survive

<p> when predators physically move to and concentrate in areas with the highest prey density.</p><p>Density dependent selection by letting less dense patches survive</p>
30
New cards

What is predator interference?

When predator density gets high, predators start interfering with each other — competing for the same prey, defending territories, or simply getting in each other's way.

density dependent

<p>When predator density gets high, predators start interfering with each other — competing for the same prey, defending territories, or simply getting in each other's way.</p><p>density dependent </p>
31
New cards

Summarize how predator and prey coexist

Low prey density → predators are inefficient (no search image, no aggregation) → prey population grows and recovers

High prey density → predators become more efficient (search image, aggregation) → prey population is suppressed

High predator density → predator interference kicks in → each predator is less effective → prey aren't driven to extinction