Send a link to your students to track their progress
29 Terms
1
New cards
Marbury V Madison (1803)
Forms the basis for the exercise of Judicial Review
2
New cards
Bush V Gore (2000)
Resolved a dispute about the 2000 election that allowed Bush to become president, direct involvement in politics
3
New cards
Plessy V Ferguson (1896)
Ruled segregation constitutional and 'separate but equal'
4
New cards
Brown V Board of Education (1954)
Ruled school segregation unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment, set a precedent chipped away at segregation
5
New cards
Town of Greece V Galloway (2014)
Ruled that legislative bodies have right to begin meetings with prayer, 1st Amendment - tension between freedom of and from religion
6
New cards
Burwell V Hobby Lobby Stores (2014)
Ruled that a provision of the Affordable Care Act making family owned businesses pay for contraceptive insurance violated religious freedom, protected 1st Amendment, question of whether companies have rights
7
New cards
Snyder V Phelps (2011)
Declared protesting at funerals constitutional under 1st Amendment, question of hate speech versus free speech
8
New cards
McDonald V City of Chicago (2016)
Ruled that Americans have fundamental right to arms, upheld 2nd Amendment
Ruled that abortion rights fell under 14th Amendment, landmark case, highly politicised
11
New cards
Gonzales V Cahart (2007)
Upheld the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act chipped away at Roe V Wade, shift to SC conservatism
12
New cards
Whole Woman's Health V Hellerstedt (2013)
Declared two Texas restrictions on abortion unconstitutional, politicised case (Obama tweeted in support)
13
New cards
Obergefell V Hodges (2015)
Declared bans on same-sex marriage unconstitutional, ruling had a quasi-legislative effect
14
New cards
National Federation of Independent Business V Sibelius (2012)
Upheld the Affordable Care Act, regulated Congress's powers, interfered in politicised issue
15
New cards
Rasul V Bush (2004)
Ruled that foreign Guantanamo Bay detainees could access US Federal Courts, blow to Bush's anti-terror program
16
New cards
Boumediene V Bush (2008)
Held that court procedures for Guantanamo Bay detainees were inadequate, involved SC in military affairs
17
New cards
Miranda V Arizona (1966)
Resulted in a ruling that specified a code of conduct for police interrogations of criminal suspects held in custody, upheld 5th Amendment
18
New cards
Texas V Johnson (1989)
Invalidated prohibitions on desecrating the US flag
19
New cards
USA V Nixon (1974)
Ordered Nixon to hand over tapes, limited power of the President to claim Executive privilege
20
New cards
Clinton V New York City (1998)
Ruled Line Veto unconstitutional, limited power of the President
21
New cards
Gratz V Bollinger and Grutter V Bollinger (2003)
First ruled University of Michigan's Affirmative Action program unconstitutional, but then ruled its Law school's program constitutional
22
New cards
Fisher V University of Texas (2013 and 2016)
Initially ruled that the University of Texas's Affirmative Action program should be scrutinised, later upheld the program
23
New cards
Engel V Vitale (1962)
Ruled it unconstitutional for state officials to compose an official school prayer and encourage its recitation in public schools. Highlights conflicts of religion within First Amendment.
24
New cards
Meredith V Jefferson County Board of Education (2007)
Ruled it unconstitutional to assign students to schools solely to achieve racial balance
25
New cards
Shelby County V Holder (2013)
Struck down parts of Voting Rights Act and allows states to use some voting restrictions.
26
New cards
Einstadt V Baird (1972)
Ruled that unmarried women can access contraception.
27
New cards
Citizens United V Federal Election Commission (2010)
Overturned part of a 2002 law and ruled that spending by corporations, associations, and labor unions is a form of protected speech under the First Amendment.
28
New cards
DC V Heller (2008)
Struck down a Washington DC ordinance that banned handguns, upheld individual right to bear arms under the second amendment.
29
New cards
Hamdan V Rumsfeld (2006)
Declares that enemy combatants have habeas corpus rights, and international rules of war (Geneva Convention) may be enforced in U.S. federal court