1/43
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Attention purpose
- Select behaviourally relevant input
- Ignore the rest
What are the two features of attention classification based on motive?
Exogenous and endogenous
What are the different types of attention based on spatial characteristics?
- Spatial
- Feature-based
- Object-based
- Focused
- Divided
What are the two types of attention based on visibility?
- Overt
- Covert
What feature of attention allows for concentration on a specific stimulus?
Selective
What feature of attention is maintained over a prolonged period?
Sustained
What are the different sensory modalities that attention can be classified into?
- Visual
- Auditory
- Tactile
What are the two categories of attention based on the source of focus?
- External
- Internal
Cocktail Party Phenomenon
- Top-down
- Bottom-up
Top-down attention
- Focussed (even in noisy room)
Bottom-up attention
- Stimuli captures attention when not selectively paying attention to it first
Top-down attention features
- Goal-directed
- Internal priorities
- Task demands
Bottom-up attention features
- Stimulus driven
- Salient / unexpected features
Everyday perception is driven by:
- Interaction of top-down and bottom-up attention
Cocktail Party Model Dichotic Listening Task *
- Headphones played 2 different stories
- Ppt asked to repeat one
- Voices were manipulated
Cocktail Party Model results *
- Ppt couldn't focus on one story if voices were the same
- More different voices = easier (gender, pitch)
Filter theory
-A selective filter interrupts the access of irrelevant input to the subsequent processes
-The selection is based on the physical characteristics of the input
-The excluded input remains briefly in the sensory register and is rejected unless attended to rapidly
-The selective filter rejects the unattended input at an early stage of processing
What was the selective filter designed to prevent?
the information processing system from becoming overloaded
Attenuation theory
The attenuator reduces, but not eliminates, unattended material.
The information is analysed if its activation exceeds a threshold, which is affected by:
• Context
• Subjective importance
• Saliency
• Priming
Late selection model
All stimuli are fully analysed for meaning & only then filtering takes place based on physical properties and meaning
Load Theory
Suggests there’s evidence supporting both early and late selection depending on the situation
Spacial attention
-Attention is directed to an area of the visual field (visual space)
-Often described as a “spotlight”
Exogenous (peripheral) cues
Appear at or near the target location in the periphery
Capture attention automatically
Effect is fast (onset ~100ms) but short-lived
Driven by bottom-up processes
Example: a sudden flash in your peripheral vision
Endogenous (central) cues
Typically appear at fixation (e.g., an arrow pointing left or
right)
Require voluntary interpretation — you must read and follow the cue
Effect is slower (onset ~300ms) but more sustained
Driven by top-down processes
Example: a sign telling you where to look
Inhibition of Return
• After attention is directed to a location, there is a cost to returning to that location shortly afterwards
-Only produced by exogenous cues
Gaze cueing
seeing another persons gaze automatically shifts your attention in the same direction
the effect is reflexive and cannot be suppressed
PET scans
• Positron emission tomography
-Participants are injected with a radioactive tracer that accumulates in active brain regions. Scanner detects signal emitted by the tracer to produce images of regional blood flow
fMRI scans
-functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
-Measures the bold signal - a proxy for neural activity
Dorsal frontoparietal network
-Active during voluntary, goal-driven, top-down orienting
-Bilateral; involved in preparing attention toward expected locations
Feature-based attention
-When you attend to a feature, processing of that feature is enhanced across the entire visual field, not just at one location
-If you are looking for a red object, all red things get a processing boost — even ones you are not directly looking at
Feature-similarity gain model
-Neural responses are scaled according to how similar a
stimulus is to the attended feature
-The closer a stimulus matches what you are attending to, the stronger the neural response - regardless of where it appears in the visual field
Real-life relevance
-When you are looking for something specific, you tune your visual system to that feature — you are in a particular attentional set
-This makes you faster at detecting matching stimuli but less sensitive to things that don't match your current set
-Looked-but-did-not-see: Drivers with an attentional set tuned to a specific feature (colour) were more likely to miss an unexpected hazard that did not share that feature
Object-based attention
directs attention to coherent forms or objects in the visual field
Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP)
A method in which stimuli are presented one at a time at a single location in rapid succession
Attentional blink
In the RSVP task, participants see a train of letters each presented very briefly (15ms)
Two conditions:
• Control: The task was to detect the presence (or absence) of the probe (X).
• Experimental: The task was to indicate the white letter (target) AND to detect the presence of the probe (X).
results of Attentional blink
-Control: ppts detected the probe almost always
-Experimental: the probability to detect the probe depends on its position after the target.
Psychological Refractory Period
people are slow to perform a task if it occurs closely after another one
Hemispatial neglect
reduced awareness of stimuli on one side of space (affects 2/3 of right hemisphere stroke patients)
fail to acknowledge contralesional stimuli, people & their own body parts
Representational neglect
only could imagine the right side of images
info not lost from memory and instead spatially inaccessible
Simultagnosia
only one object wins the competition for attentional selection at any moment
Optic ataxia
can describe where something is but cannot reach for it accurately
Ocular apraxia
cannot voluntarily move their eyes to a target even though reflexive eye movements are preserved