1/53
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
a-b design
within subjects design
baseline measurement is taken and then an intervention is introduced
second measurement is taken
a-b-a design
within subjects design
baseline measurement is taken and then an intervention is introduced
second measurement is taken
intervention is removed and a third measurement is taken
a-b-a-b design
within subjects design
baseline measurement is taken and intervention is introduced
second measurement is taken
intervention is removed
third measurement is taken
the intervention is reintroduced and fourth measurement is taken
double-blind procedure
neither participant nor primary investigator knows which level of independent variable the participant is receiving
experimenter-expectancy effect
experimenter consciously or unconsciously gives participants hints as to their expectations for the outcome of the study
participants shape their behavior to mimic that effect
meta-analysis
statistical analysis
combines results of several similar studies
mixed design
experimental paradigm
involves at least one within-subjects variable and at least one between-subjects variable
mixed design analysis of variance (mixed design ANOVA)
analysis of variance involving at least one within-subjects variable
at least one between-subjects variable
single-blind procedure
experimenter knows which level of IV a participant is receiving but the participant doesn’t
single-subject design
within-subjects design that monitors changes in one individual or one group
treatment-as-usual group
comparison group in clinical studies
already established treatment is administered for comparison to experimental treatment
waiting list control group
method for creating a control group in a clinical experiment
one group receives no treatment and serve as an empty control group until researchers determine which experimental treatment is most effective
benefits of small N designs
allows researchers to systematically examine how an IV influences behavior of an individual case
features of small N designs
each participant serves as own control/comparison
DV measured across multiple trials within each condition
built-in replications
data examined separately for each participant
visual analysis of data
problems with large N designs
participants with a particular attribute are rare
members of a specific animal species are rare, costly, or require much time for training
cell mean
the mean for a dependent variable for one combination of independent variables in the experiment
crossover interaction
also known as disordinal interaction
IV has opposing effects on the DV at the different at the different levels of the other IV
factor
also known as IV
something that can influence an outcome or DV
factorial ANOVA
analysis of variance where there are at least two IV
factorial design
an experimental design involving two or more IV
hybrid design
experimental design with at least two IV and at least one quasi-experimental variable
interaction
the combined effects of two or more IV on a dependent variable
interaction effect hypothesis
hypothesis regarding the combined effect of multiple variables on the DV
main effect hypothesis
hypothesis that focuses on the effect of a single IV on the DV, ignoring all other IV
marginal mean
mean for DV for one level of an IV collapsed across all other IV
ordinal interaction
one IV has an influence on a particular level of the other IV but not on all of its levels
suppression effect
combined effect of two variables less than sum of the independent effects of the variables
synergistic effect
combined effect of two variables is greater than the sum of the independent effects of the variables
two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
analysis of variance where there are at least two IV
vignette
tool used in experiments where the experimenter presents participants with a situation and then observes their reaction
attrition
when research participants drop out of a research study before it is complete
baseline measurement
measurement of the dependent variable that occurs before the experimental manipulation in a within-subjects design
behavioral diary
self-report measure
method = naturalistic observation where participant is the observer
carryover effect
when previous stimuli affect the interpretation of subsequent stimuli
counterbalancing
every possible order of stimuli is employed an equal number of times
dependent means t-test
statistic that determines whether two sets of scores are different
fatigue effect
when a participant becomes tired and this impacts the dependent measure
threat to internal validity
history
when an external event occurs during the study
threat to internal validity
instrumentation
dependent variable measured differently at different points during the experiment
threat to internal validity
latin square design
when a counterbalancing strategy involves each level of the independent, appearing in each possible position an equal number of times
there are as many sequences as there are conditions
maturation
passage of time impacts the dependent measure
this is a threat to internal validity
mortality
research participants drop out of a research study before it is complete
order effect
sequence of stimuli in a within-subjects design influences the DV
threat to internal validity
practice effect
when a participant changes their responses as a result of experience
pretest-posttest design
conducted within-subjects where the DV is measured before and after the experimental manipulation
repeated-measures analysis of variance (repeated-measures ANOVA)
statistic used in a repeated-measures design with three or more conditions to test whether there is a significant effect of the IV on the DV
repeated-measures design
within-subjects experimental paradigm in which each participant receives every level of the IV and is measured following each level of the IV
research participant pool
school’s list of students who will receive a psychology credit for participating in an experiment
sensitization effect
participants who have been in a study for some time eventually guess the hypothesis and alter their behavior as a result
threat to internal validity
t-test for dependent means
statistic that determines whether two sets of scores are different
testing effect
when taking a test multiple times, it can change overall response to the test
threat to internal validity
practice effect
performance steadily improves
fatigue effect
performance steadily declines
carryover effect
exposure to earlier experimental conditions influencing responses to subsequent conditions