Bhb 4 and Imagined Community Card 1: Nations vs. States

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/20

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 5:05 AM on 4/10/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

21 Terms

1
New cards

Nation

  • A group sharing demographic/cultural traits (language, history) who recognize themselves as a community and seek self-determination.

2
New cards

State:

: A politically organized territory with a government that recognizes no higher law (sovereignty).

3
New cards

Nation-State

  • When the political boundaries of the state match the cultural boundaries of the nation (e.g., Japan).

4
New cards

Ethnic Group vs. Nation:

  • An ethnic group becomes a nation only when it seeks self-governance or autonomy (Ethnonationalism).

5
New cards

Sovereignty & Westphalia (1648)

  • The "Big Bang": The Treaty of Westphalia created the modern sovereign state system.

  • Core Principle: Rulers have total authority within their borders; no outside power (like the Pope or Holy Roman Empire) can interfere.

European Export: This system is a modern Western invention forced onto the global stage through colonialism, often creating "mismatched" states.

6
New cards

 The Enlightenment & Popular Sovereignty

  • Pre-Enlightenment: People were "subjects" of monarchs ruling by Divine Right.

  • The Shift: The Social Contract (Hobbes, Locke, Kant) argued that people are citizens with rights.

  • Popular Sovereignty: Rulers govern only with the "consent of the governed." Power resides in "the people."

  • Key Dates: American Revolution (1776), French Revolution (1789), and the Revolutions of 1848 spread these ideas globally.

7
New cards

Nationalism — The Three Pillars

Nationalism is the belief that the nation is the ultimate basis of political loyalty. According to Druckman, it has three pillars:

  1. Sentimental: Emotional attachment to the homeland.

  2. Identity/Self-Esteem: Gaining self-worth through national pride.

  3. Motivation: The drive to act or sacrifice for the country.

8
New cards

Theoretical Perspectives on Nationalism

  • Realists: View nationalism as a natural, inevitable force and a primary driver of state behavior.

Constructivists: View nationalism as a social construct, often manipulated by elites to serve specific interests

9
New cards

Unification vs. State-First Building

  • Unification Nationalism: Nation → State. A group of people with a shared culture creates a government. Leads to stability (e.g., Germany, Italy).

  • State-First (Post-Colonial): State → Nation. Artificial borders created by colonial powers forced different groups together.

    • Result: Fragile states and identity violence (e.g., Hutu vs. Tutsi in Rwanda).

10
New cards

 The "Two Faces" of Nationalism

  • Pros (Positive): Promotes democracy (links the people to the state), discourages imperialism (e.g., East Timor resisting Indonesia), and creates economic cohesion.

  • Cons (Negative): Can lead to Parochialism (ignoring the "other"), Xenophobia (fear of foreigners), and Exceptionalism (believing your nation is above the rules).

11
New cards

The Dark Side — Nativism & Oppression

  • Nativism: Favoring "established" inhabitants over immigrants, often viewing them as a "burden" (highest in "front-line" states like Italy/Greece).

  • Internal Oppression: Dominant groups marginalizing or killing minorities (Genocide in Rwanda, ethnic cleansing in Bosnia/Myanmar).

Neo-Imperialism: Using nationalism to justify conquering others (e.g., Russia’s invasion of Ukraine to protect "ethnic Russians" in Novorossiya).

12
New cards

Self-Determination (Pros & Cons)

  • Definition: The right of a nation to follow its own political destiny (Championed by Woodrow Wilson).

  • Pros: Ends oppression and prevents violence by giving groups their own space.

  • Cons: * Disentanglement: Groups are often intermingled in the same cities (Bosnia).

    • Fragmentation: Threats to dissolve stable states (Quebec, Scotland, Catalonia).

    • Microstates: Creates tiny, weak countries that can't defend themselves (South Sudan).

13
New cards

 Requisites of Statehood

To function, a state needs these 6 essentials:

  1. Sovereignty (No higher legal authority).

  2. Territory (Physical boundaries, though often disputed like Western Sahara).

  3. Population (From 825 in Vatican City to 1.4B in China).

  4. Internal Organization (Political/economic structure).

  5. Diplomatic Recognition (Subjective; e.g., the US took 30 years to recognize China).

  6. Domestic Support (Loyalty or "passive acquiescence" of the people).

14
New cards

Embryonic vs. Fragile States

  • Embryonic States: Function like states but lack full recognition.

    • Examples: Taiwan (legal limbo), Palestine (observer status), Tibet (no recognition).

  • Fragile States: Legally recognized but lost key traits (support or organization).

    • Examples: Somalia (decades of chaos), South Sudan (near failure).

  • Fragile States Index: Ranks 179 countries on stability (e.g., Finland = 15.1 (Sustainable) vs. USA = 46.6 (Stable)).

15
New cards

Weber & Diversionary Theory

  • Weber’s Monopoly: The state is defined by its "monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force."

  • Diversionary Theory: Leaders start external wars (e.g., Russia/Ukraine) to distract citizens from internal failures by focusing on a common enemy.

16
New cards

 What is "Official Nationalism"?

  • The Definition: A "top-down," state-managed national identity. It is the willed merger of a dynastic empire (the ruling family) and a nation (the people).

  • The Goal: It was a defensive strategy by imperial elites to stay in power as popular nationalist movements began to threaten their legitimacy.

The Distinction: Unlike "popular" nationalism (from the people), this is nationalism imposed by the state via schools, the military, and bureaucracy.

17
New cards

The "Naturalization" of Empires

  • The Problem: In the 19th century, empires were multiethnic and multilingual. The Romanovs (Russia) or Hapsburgs (Austria) didn't "belong" to one specific nation.

  • The Solution: Elites began to "naturalize" themselves. They stopped being "divine rulers" and started pretending to be the first "patriots" of the nation.

Analytical Point: Anderson notes the irony of monarchs suddenly learning the local "national" language (like the Romanovs switching from French to Russian) to prove they were part of the nation.

18
New cards

 Russification as a Primary Example

  • The Policy: The Romanov dynasty forced the Russian language and Orthodox religion onto their diverse subjects (Poles, Finns, Ukrainians).

  • The Logic: If everyone speaks Russian and identifies as Russian, they won't rebel against the Russian Czar.

The Result: It often backfired, provoking "counter-nationalism" in the minority groups who felt their own identities were being erased.

19
New cards

 Macaulayism & "The English-Educated"

  • The Concept: Named after Lord Macaulay’s minute on Indian education.

  • The Strategy: Creating a class of "intermediaries" who were "Indian in blood and colour, but English in taste, in opinions, in morals, and in intellect."

The Role: This class was meant to be the "interpreters" between the British rulers and the millions they governed.

20
New cards

The "Stretch" (Empire vs. Nation)

  • The Paradox: Empires are inherently inclusive (they want to conquer everyone). Nations are inherently exclusive (they have specific borders and one culture).

  • The Outcome: Trying to fit a "national" identity onto a "giant imperial body" was like a "stretch."

  • Short Answer Tip: Use the term "The Stretch" to describe the friction that eventually broke empires apart (e.g., the Austro-Hungarian or Ottoman empires).

21
New cards

Japan — Top-Down Modernization

  • Meiji Restoration: Japan is the most successful non-Western example of Official Nationalism.

  • The Move: The elite abolished feudalism and created a fierce national identity centered on the Emperor to avoid being colonized by the West.

Why it worked: Unlike Russia or Britain, Japan had a relatively homogeneous population, making the "top-down" identity easier to absorb.