1/20
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Nation
A group sharing demographic/cultural traits (language, history) who recognize themselves as a community and seek self-determination.
State:
: A politically organized territory with a government that recognizes no higher law (sovereignty).
Nation-State
When the political boundaries of the state match the cultural boundaries of the nation (e.g., Japan).
Ethnic Group vs. Nation:
An ethnic group becomes a nation only when it seeks self-governance or autonomy (Ethnonationalism).
Sovereignty & Westphalia (1648)
The "Big Bang": The Treaty of Westphalia created the modern sovereign state system.
Core Principle: Rulers have total authority within their borders; no outside power (like the Pope or Holy Roman Empire) can interfere.
European Export: This system is a modern Western invention forced onto the global stage through colonialism, often creating "mismatched" states.
The Enlightenment & Popular Sovereignty
Pre-Enlightenment: People were "subjects" of monarchs ruling by Divine Right.
The Shift: The Social Contract (Hobbes, Locke, Kant) argued that people are citizens with rights.
Popular Sovereignty: Rulers govern only with the "consent of the governed." Power resides in "the people."
Key Dates: American Revolution (1776), French Revolution (1789), and the Revolutions of 1848 spread these ideas globally.
Nationalism — The Three Pillars
Nationalism is the belief that the nation is the ultimate basis of political loyalty. According to Druckman, it has three pillars:
Sentimental: Emotional attachment to the homeland.
Identity/Self-Esteem: Gaining self-worth through national pride.
Motivation: The drive to act or sacrifice for the country.
Theoretical Perspectives on Nationalism
Realists: View nationalism as a natural, inevitable force and a primary driver of state behavior.
Constructivists: View nationalism as a social construct, often manipulated by elites to serve specific interests
Unification vs. State-First Building
Unification Nationalism: Nation → State. A group of people with a shared culture creates a government. Leads to stability (e.g., Germany, Italy).
State-First (Post-Colonial): State → Nation. Artificial borders created by colonial powers forced different groups together.
Result: Fragile states and identity violence (e.g., Hutu vs. Tutsi in Rwanda).
The "Two Faces" of Nationalism
Pros (Positive): Promotes democracy (links the people to the state), discourages imperialism (e.g., East Timor resisting Indonesia), and creates economic cohesion.
Cons (Negative): Can lead to Parochialism (ignoring the "other"), Xenophobia (fear of foreigners), and Exceptionalism (believing your nation is above the rules).
The Dark Side — Nativism & Oppression
Nativism: Favoring "established" inhabitants over immigrants, often viewing them as a "burden" (highest in "front-line" states like Italy/Greece).
Internal Oppression: Dominant groups marginalizing or killing minorities (Genocide in Rwanda, ethnic cleansing in Bosnia/Myanmar).
Neo-Imperialism: Using nationalism to justify conquering others (e.g., Russia’s invasion of Ukraine to protect "ethnic Russians" in Novorossiya).
Self-Determination (Pros & Cons)
Definition: The right of a nation to follow its own political destiny (Championed by Woodrow Wilson).
Pros: Ends oppression and prevents violence by giving groups their own space.
Cons: * Disentanglement: Groups are often intermingled in the same cities (Bosnia).
Fragmentation: Threats to dissolve stable states (Quebec, Scotland, Catalonia).
Microstates: Creates tiny, weak countries that can't defend themselves (South Sudan).
Requisites of Statehood
To function, a state needs these 6 essentials:
Sovereignty (No higher legal authority).
Territory (Physical boundaries, though often disputed like Western Sahara).
Population (From 825 in Vatican City to 1.4B in China).
Internal Organization (Political/economic structure).
Diplomatic Recognition (Subjective; e.g., the US took 30 years to recognize China).
Domestic Support (Loyalty or "passive acquiescence" of the people).
Embryonic vs. Fragile States
Embryonic States: Function like states but lack full recognition.
Examples: Taiwan (legal limbo), Palestine (observer status), Tibet (no recognition).
Fragile States: Legally recognized but lost key traits (support or organization).
Examples: Somalia (decades of chaos), South Sudan (near failure).
Fragile States Index: Ranks 179 countries on stability (e.g., Finland = 15.1 (Sustainable) vs. USA = 46.6 (Stable)).
Weber & Diversionary Theory
Weber’s Monopoly: The state is defined by its "monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force."
Diversionary Theory: Leaders start external wars (e.g., Russia/Ukraine) to distract citizens from internal failures by focusing on a common enemy.
What is "Official Nationalism"?
The Definition: A "top-down," state-managed national identity. It is the willed merger of a dynastic empire (the ruling family) and a nation (the people).
The Goal: It was a defensive strategy by imperial elites to stay in power as popular nationalist movements began to threaten their legitimacy.
The Distinction: Unlike "popular" nationalism (from the people), this is nationalism imposed by the state via schools, the military, and bureaucracy.
The "Naturalization" of Empires
The Problem: In the 19th century, empires were multiethnic and multilingual. The Romanovs (Russia) or Hapsburgs (Austria) didn't "belong" to one specific nation.
The Solution: Elites began to "naturalize" themselves. They stopped being "divine rulers" and started pretending to be the first "patriots" of the nation.
Analytical Point: Anderson notes the irony of monarchs suddenly learning the local "national" language (like the Romanovs switching from French to Russian) to prove they were part of the nation.
Russification as a Primary Example
The Policy: The Romanov dynasty forced the Russian language and Orthodox religion onto their diverse subjects (Poles, Finns, Ukrainians).
The Logic: If everyone speaks Russian and identifies as Russian, they won't rebel against the Russian Czar.
The Result: It often backfired, provoking "counter-nationalism" in the minority groups who felt their own identities were being erased.
Macaulayism & "The English-Educated"
The Concept: Named after Lord Macaulay’s minute on Indian education.
The Strategy: Creating a class of "intermediaries" who were "Indian in blood and colour, but English in taste, in opinions, in morals, and in intellect."
The Role: This class was meant to be the "interpreters" between the British rulers and the millions they governed.
The "Stretch" (Empire vs. Nation)
The Paradox: Empires are inherently inclusive (they want to conquer everyone). Nations are inherently exclusive (they have specific borders and one culture).
The Outcome: Trying to fit a "national" identity onto a "giant imperial body" was like a "stretch."
Short Answer Tip: Use the term "The Stretch" to describe the friction that eventually broke empires apart (e.g., the Austro-Hungarian or Ottoman empires).
Japan — Top-Down Modernization
Meiji Restoration: Japan is the most successful non-Western example of Official Nationalism.
The Move: The elite abolished feudalism and created a fierce national identity centered on the Emperor to avoid being colonized by the West.
Why it worked: Unlike Russia or Britain, Japan had a relatively homogeneous population, making the "top-down" identity easier to absorb.