Unit 3 AP Government

0.0(0)
Studied by 28 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/69

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 11:26 PM on 4/18/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

70 Terms

1
New cards

1st Amendment

freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, petition

2
New cards

2nd Amendment

Right to bear arms

3
New cards

3rd Amendment

Bans quartering of soldiers

4
New cards

4th amendment

bans unreasonable searches and seizures

5
New cards

5th amendment

right to due process, no self-incrimination, no double jeopardy, grand jury

6
New cards

6th amendment

Right to a fair and speedy trial

7
New cards

7th amendment

right to jury trial in civil lawsuits

8
New cards

8th amendment

No cruel and unusual punishment

9
New cards

9th amendment

unenumerated rights of the people; government cannot infringe people's rights

10
New cards

10th amendment

Rights reserved to states or people

11
New cards

Establishment Clause

Government may not establish an official religion.

12
New cards

Free exercise clause

Protects individuals right to practice religion freely.

13
New cards

Engel v. Vitale

Year

Outcome

Principle

1962

School prayer unconstitutional

Establishment Clause

14
New cards

Wisconsin v. Yoder

Year

Outcome

Principle

1972

Amish exempt from compulsory schooling

Free Exercise

15
New cards

Tinker v. Des Moines

Year

Outcome

Principle

1969

Student speech protected

Symbolic speech

16
New cards

Schenck v. U.S.

Year

Outcome

Principle

1919

Speech may be limited

Clear and present danger

17
New cards

New York Times Co. v. U.S

Year

Outcome

Principle

1971

Prior restraint unconstitutional

Freedom of press

18
New cards

Limiting Speech

Speech may be limited if it threatens public safety (creates clear and present danger, slander, obscenity, libel, disrupts school learning, ).

19
New cards

Gregg v. Georgia

Year

Outcome

Principle

1976

Death penalty constitutional

Eighth Amendment: Cruel and unusual punishment

20
New cards

Selective Incorporation

Applying Bill of Rights protections to states via the 14th Amendment.

21
New cards

Due Process

Fair treatment under the law

22
New cards

Equal Protection

Laws must apply equally to all persons

23
New cards

McDonald v Chicago

Year

Outcome

Principle

2010

2nd Amendment applies to states

Selective incorporation

2nd amendment

24
New cards

Patriot Act

Year

Description

Principle

2001

Expanded surveillance powers

National security vs liberty

25
New cards

USA Freedoms Act

2015

Limited metadata collection

Privacy rights

26
New cards

Miranda v. Arizona

Year

Outcome

Principle

1966

Rights must be read

5th amendment

6th amendment

27
New cards

Gideon v Wainwright

Year

Outcome

Principle

1963

Right to an attorney 

6th amendment

28
New cards

Exclusionary Rule

Evidence obtained illegally cannot be used in court.

29
New cards

The right to privacy is interpreted in the constitution….

Implied by the bill of rights (1st, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 9th amendment)

30
New cards

Roe v. Wade

Year

Outcome

Principle

1973

Abortion protected

14th amendment

31
New cards

King’s “Letter from a Birmingham Jail”

Causes

Outcomes

Constitutional Principles

Segregation

Civil rights activism

14th amendment

32
New cards

National Organization of Women

Causes

Outcomes

Constitutional Principles

Gender inequality 

Title lX, workplace equality 

14th amendment

33
New cards

Pro-Life

Causes

Outcomes

Constitutional Principles

Moral Objections 

State abortion laws 

9th amendment

34
New cards

LGBTQ rights

Causes

Outcomes

Constitutional Principles

Discrimination 

Marriage Equality 

Equal protection clause

35
New cards

Plessy v. Ferguson

Year

Outcome

Principle

1896

Separate but equal

14th amendment

36
New cards

Jim Crow Laws

Year

Outcome

Principle

Late 1800s

Legal segregation 

States rights 

37
New cards

Brown v. Board

Year

Outcome

Principle

1954

Segregation unconstitutional 

Equal protection clause 

38
New cards

Civil Rights Act of 1964

Year

Outcome

Principle

1964

Ended segregation 

Commerce Clause 

39
New cards

Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972

Year

Outcome

Principle

1972

Gender equality in education 

Equal Protection 

40
New cards

The Voting Rights Act of 1965

Year

Outcome

Principle

1965

Ended voting discrimination 

Equal Protection 

15th amendment

41
New cards

Affirmative Action causes

Historic discrimination and inequality.

42
New cards

Affirmative action outcomes

Expanded access to education and employment; later court rulings began limiting racial preferences.

43
New cards

Affirmative action principles

Equal protection clause

44
New cards

Civil Liberties

Freedoms that protect individuals from government interference.

45
New cards

Civil Rights

Protections against discrimination and unequal treatment.

46
New cards

Constitutional Amendments

can overturn Supreme Court decisions by changing the Constitution itself, which is the highest legal authority.

47
New cards

Judicial appointments and confirmations

The president nominates Supreme Court justices and the Senate confirms them, allowing the political branches to shape the Court’s ideological direction over time.

Example:

  • President Reagan’s appointment of conservative justices shifted the Court rightward

  • Recent confirmations have influenced decisions on abortion, voting rights, and gun regulation

48
New cards

The President evading/ignoring SCOTUS decisions

The president may delay, weaken, or refuse to enforce a Supreme Court ruling.

Example:

  • President Andrew Jackson ignored Worcester v. Georgia (1832), allowing Georgia to continue policies against Native Americans

49
New cards

States evading/ignoring SCOTUS decisions

States may resist or delay compliance with Supreme Court rulings through legislative action or non-enforcement.

Example:

  • Southern states resisted Brown v. Board of Education (1954) through “massive resistance” laws and delayed school desegregation

50
New cards

Congressional Acts

Congress can check the Supreme Court by limiting its appellate jurisdiction, changing the number of justices, and rewriting laws that the Court rules unconstitutional.
Example:

Congress limited the Court’s jurisdiction during Reconstruction in Ex parte McCardle (1869) and has changed the Court’s size multiple times.

51
New cards

Judicial Activism

Courts take an active role in shaping policy and protecting rights.

52
New cards

Judicial Restraint

Judges avoid overturning laws and follow the constitution closely.

53
New cards

Loose Constructionist

Interprets the Constitution flexibly; believes it evolves with society.

54
New cards

Strict Constructionist

Interprets the Constitution narrowly based on original intent.

55
New cards

Refusal to implement

The president or states may delay or resist enforcing Court decisions, weakening the Court’s authority.

56
New cards

Legislation

Congress can limit the Court’s jurisdiction or rewrite laws to address Court rulings.

57
New cards

Appointments

Presidents appoint new justices to influence future Court decisions.

58
New cards

Establishment of new precedents

Can change laws, expand or limit rights, and reflect the ideology of current justices.

59
New cards

Rejecting existing precedents

Can overturn long-standing decisions, causing political and public controversy.

60
New cards

Precedents

Past court decisions that guide future rulings.

Example: Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

61
New cards

Stare decisis

The principle that courts should follow previous decisions to ensure consistency in the law. “Let the decision stand.”

Example: Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992)

Supreme Court applied by upholding Roe v. Wade

62
New cards

Landmark Case

often establish important precedents or reinterpret the Constitution.

Example: Brown v. Board of Education (1954)

63
New cards

What is the main purpose of the judicial branch?

To protect the Supreme Court’s independence and use judicial review to interpret the Constitution.

64
New cards

Article III of the Constitution

Establishes the judicial branch, creates the Supreme Court, allows Congress to create lower courts, and gives judges life tenure.

65
New cards

Judicial Review

The power of the Supreme Court to declare laws or executive actions unconstitutional.

66
New cards

Federalist NO. 78 argued:

Judicial review is necessary to protect the Constitution, and the judiciary is the “least dangerous” branch because it only interprets laws.

67
New cards

Why is judicial independence important?

prevents political influence, allowing justices to make decisions based on the Constitution.

68
New cards

Marbury v. Madison

Year

Description and Outcome

Constitutional Principles

1803

Established judicial review after the Court struck down part of the Judiciary Act of 1789

Supremacy of the Constitution; judicial review

69
New cards

Why is judicial review important?

It prevents legislative/executive overreach and protects individual rights.

70
New cards

How does life tenure affect judges?

It ensures judges can decide cases without fear of political pressure.