1/69
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
1st Amendment
freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, petition
2nd Amendment
Right to bear arms
3rd Amendment
Bans quartering of soldiers
4th amendment
bans unreasonable searches and seizures
5th amendment
right to due process, no self-incrimination, no double jeopardy, grand jury
6th amendment
Right to a fair and speedy trial
7th amendment
right to jury trial in civil lawsuits
8th amendment
No cruel and unusual punishment
9th amendment
unenumerated rights of the people; government cannot infringe people's rights
10th amendment
Rights reserved to states or people
Establishment Clause
Government may not establish an official religion.
Free exercise clause
Protects individuals right to practice religion freely.
Engel v. Vitale
Year | Outcome | Principle |
1962 | School prayer unconstitutional | Establishment Clause |
Wisconsin v. Yoder
Year | Outcome | Principle |
1972 | Amish exempt from compulsory schooling | Free Exercise |
Tinker v. Des Moines
Year | Outcome | Principle |
1969 | Student speech protected | Symbolic speech |
Schenck v. U.S.
Year | Outcome | Principle |
1919 | Speech may be limited | Clear and present danger |
New York Times Co. v. U.S
Year | Outcome | Principle |
1971 | Prior restraint unconstitutional | Freedom of press |
Limiting Speech
Speech may be limited if it threatens public safety (creates clear and present danger, slander, obscenity, libel, disrupts school learning, ).
Gregg v. Georgia
Year | Outcome | Principle |
1976 | Death penalty constitutional | Eighth Amendment: Cruel and unusual punishment |
Selective Incorporation
Applying Bill of Rights protections to states via the 14th Amendment.
Due Process
Fair treatment under the law
Equal Protection
Laws must apply equally to all persons
McDonald v Chicago
Year | Outcome | Principle |
2010 | 2nd Amendment applies to states | Selective incorporation 2nd amendment |
Patriot Act
Year | Description | Principle |
2001 | Expanded surveillance powers | National security vs liberty |
USA Freedoms Act
2015 | Limited metadata collection | Privacy rights |
Miranda v. Arizona
Year | Outcome | Principle |
1966 | Rights must be read | 5th amendment 6th amendment |
Gideon v Wainwright
Year | Outcome | Principle |
1963 | Right to an attorney | 6th amendment |
Exclusionary Rule
Evidence obtained illegally cannot be used in court.
The right to privacy is interpreted in the constitution….
Implied by the bill of rights (1st, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 9th amendment)
Roe v. Wade
Year | Outcome | Principle |
1973 | Abortion protected | 14th amendment |
King’s “Letter from a Birmingham Jail”
Causes | Outcomes | Constitutional Principles |
Segregation | Civil rights activism | 14th amendment |
National Organization of Women
Causes | Outcomes | Constitutional Principles |
Gender inequality | Title lX, workplace equality | 14th amendment |
Pro-Life
Causes | Outcomes | Constitutional Principles |
Moral Objections | State abortion laws | 9th amendment |
LGBTQ rights
Causes | Outcomes | Constitutional Principles |
Discrimination | Marriage Equality | Equal protection clause |
Plessy v. Ferguson
Year | Outcome | Principle |
1896 | Separate but equal | 14th amendment |
Jim Crow Laws
Year | Outcome | Principle |
Late 1800s | Legal segregation | States rights |
Brown v. Board
Year | Outcome | Principle |
1954 | Segregation unconstitutional | Equal protection clause |
Civil Rights Act of 1964
Year | Outcome | Principle |
1964 | Ended segregation | Commerce Clause |
Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972
Year | Outcome | Principle |
1972 | Gender equality in education | Equal Protection |
The Voting Rights Act of 1965
Year | Outcome | Principle |
1965 | Ended voting discrimination | Equal Protection 15th amendment |
Affirmative Action causes
Historic discrimination and inequality.
Affirmative action outcomes
Expanded access to education and employment; later court rulings began limiting racial preferences.
Affirmative action principles
Equal protection clause
Civil Liberties
Freedoms that protect individuals from government interference.
Civil Rights
Protections against discrimination and unequal treatment.
Constitutional Amendments
can overturn Supreme Court decisions by changing the Constitution itself, which is the highest legal authority.
Judicial appointments and confirmations
The president nominates Supreme Court justices and the Senate confirms them, allowing the political branches to shape the Court’s ideological direction over time.
Example:
President Reagan’s appointment of conservative justices shifted the Court rightward
Recent confirmations have influenced decisions on abortion, voting rights, and gun regulation
The President evading/ignoring SCOTUS decisions
The president may delay, weaken, or refuse to enforce a Supreme Court ruling.
Example:
President Andrew Jackson ignored Worcester v. Georgia (1832), allowing Georgia to continue policies against Native Americans
States evading/ignoring SCOTUS decisions
States may resist or delay compliance with Supreme Court rulings through legislative action or non-enforcement.
Example:
Southern states resisted Brown v. Board of Education (1954) through “massive resistance” laws and delayed school desegregation
Congressional Acts
Congress can check the Supreme Court by limiting its appellate jurisdiction, changing the number of justices, and rewriting laws that the Court rules unconstitutional.
Example:
Congress limited the Court’s jurisdiction during Reconstruction in Ex parte McCardle (1869) and has changed the Court’s size multiple times.
Judicial Activism
Courts take an active role in shaping policy and protecting rights.
Judicial Restraint
Judges avoid overturning laws and follow the constitution closely.
Loose Constructionist
Interprets the Constitution flexibly; believes it evolves with society.
Strict Constructionist
Interprets the Constitution narrowly based on original intent.
Refusal to implement
The president or states may delay or resist enforcing Court decisions, weakening the Court’s authority.
Legislation
Congress can limit the Court’s jurisdiction or rewrite laws to address Court rulings.
Appointments
Presidents appoint new justices to influence future Court decisions.
Establishment of new precedents
Can change laws, expand or limit rights, and reflect the ideology of current justices.
Rejecting existing precedents
Can overturn long-standing decisions, causing political and public controversy.
Precedents
Past court decisions that guide future rulings.
Example: Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)
Stare decisis
The principle that courts should follow previous decisions to ensure consistency in the law. “Let the decision stand.”
Example: Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992)
Supreme Court applied by upholding Roe v. Wade
Landmark Case
often establish important precedents or reinterpret the Constitution.
Example: Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
What is the main purpose of the judicial branch?
To protect the Supreme Court’s independence and use judicial review to interpret the Constitution.
Article III of the Constitution
Establishes the judicial branch, creates the Supreme Court, allows Congress to create lower courts, and gives judges life tenure.
Judicial Review
The power of the Supreme Court to declare laws or executive actions unconstitutional.
Federalist NO. 78 argued:
Judicial review is necessary to protect the Constitution, and the judiciary is the “least dangerous” branch because it only interprets laws.
Why is judicial independence important?
prevents political influence, allowing justices to make decisions based on the Constitution.
Marbury v. Madison
Year | Description and Outcome | Constitutional Principles |
1803 | Established judicial review after the Court struck down part of the Judiciary Act of 1789 | Supremacy of the Constitution; judicial review |
Why is judicial review important?
It prevents legislative/executive overreach and protects individual rights.
How does life tenure affect judges?
It ensures judges can decide cases without fear of political pressure.