1/5
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
how it works
UK divided up into 650 constituencies
to stand in elections under FPTP the candidate has to pay a deposit this is returned if 5% of the vote is obtained
electors cast their vote for one candidate in single member constituencies
each voter has one vote for one candidate
the winner only needs plurality of votes the winner is the one with the most votes in there constituency this may not be above 50% of votes cast
for a party to win the overall general election they aim to have a majority over all other parties in the commons thus they need to get at least 326 MPs elected to be in that position
plurality electoral system
each voter can only vote for one candidate
the candidate who achieves the most votes wins
also known as winner takes all no matter how close the vote was a candidate with less than 50% can win
safe seats
this is a safe constituency one that is regarded secure by a party
in such seat there is very little chance of the seat changing party hands
for example in 2017 labour retained liverpool walton with 85% of the vote
marginal seats
this is held with a very small lead only require a small amount of votes to change hands
most money and campaigning is focused in these areas
for example 2017 SNP won north east fife by only 2 votes
advantages of FPTP
it creates stability and strong governments able to make coherent decisions yet remaining with the flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances
MPs have close relationship with constituents they meet them regularly at surgeries and represent their concerns in parliament
the candidate who most people prefer wins that seat
it is very simple and easy to operate all that is required is an X next to the desired choice
it is quick to produce a result
FPTP has the effect of keeping out small extremist parties by discriminating against them
disadvantages of FPTP
it discriminates in favour of two main parties this can make gov unrepresentative
votes are wasted on losing candidates or on huge majority’s in safe seats so not everbodys’s vote is worth the same
other systems also offer constituents good local members to represent them for example STV and AMS
most MPs do not achieve 50% of votes so they are not representative of their constituency
electronic voting means the ease and speed of FPTP is overrated
it discriminates small and moderate parties with legitimate causes and ideologies