1/9
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Main rule
S.2(2)
O has to do all that is R to keep lawful visitors R safe
Premises
S.1(3a)
Any fixed or moveable structure
Occupier
A person who is in control of the premises
Children
S.2(3a)
O must prepare for kids to be less careful- Taylor v GCC
O can rely on parents to take some responsibility- Bourne v Marsten
Increases SoC
Specialists
S.2(3b)
O can expect them to guard themselves against dangers in the field of expertise- Roles v Nathan
Generally decreases SoC
Warnings
S.2(4a)
Must be enough to keep lawful visitors R safe - Woolins
No duty to warn against obvious dangers - Darby v National trust
Defences
O not liable for work of IC if took R steps to check work - Haseldine
Is it R to hire them
If C consents to the risk of their action - Geary v Wetherspoon
Excluding liability
Cannot exclude liability for death or personal injury - Ashdown v Samuel Williams
How to answer
Establish what the law is
Define lawful visitor, premises, occupier
Judge SoC needed to reach
Decide if any applicable defences
Clues to identify is Q is about OLA ‘57
Ownership of something, invited/employed/member