1/19
Law 241 Contract
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Stilk v Myrik
Performing a duty you were already contracted to do is not valid consideration
sailors
Stilk v Myrik
Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls
In variation a practical benefit is valid consideration
contractor
Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls
Part payment of debt is not good consideration for creditor to not claim full debt later on
Foakes v Beer
interest
Foakes v Beer
Foakes v Beer
Payment of a lesser sum cannot be satisfaction for a greater sum - Pinnels case
Re Selectmove Ltd
Practical benefit from part payment of debt is not good consideration
inland revenue
Re Selectmove Ltd
MWB Business Exchange Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd
part payment and a practical benefit that is good enough to forgive rest of debt is valid consideration
maintaining contractual relationship
MWB Business Exchange Ltd v Rock Advertising Ltd
Hamer v Sidway
Consideration can be some right, interest, profit or benefit or some forbearance, detriment, loss or responsibility given or suffered. - The Exchequer Chamber, in 1875
no smoke or drink
Hamer v Sidway
Chappel v Nestle
Consideration need not be adequate
wrappers
Chappel v Nestle
Collins v Godefroy
Preexisting legal duty not good consideration
siuuuupeena
Collins v Godefroy
Scotson and Others v Pegg
A promise can be good consideration for a contract even if the same thing was promised to a third party in another contract
coal
Scotson and Others v Pegg