1/12
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Strengths of the two process model
real world application in exposure therapy, when avoidance is prevented it ceases to be reinforced, therefore reducing avoidance
Evidence for a link between bad experiences and phobias, Little albert study with rat and lour metal pipe, De Jongh found 73% of people who fear going to the dentist had a traumatic experience compared to a low anxiety control group at only 21% having traumatic experience
Beck's CBT
application of his cognitive theory of depression, identifying negative thoughts about the world, self and future (negative triad), once identified they must be challenged and test the reality of these negative beliefs
Limitations of the two process model
does not account for cognitive aspects of phobias, behavioural explanations are geared towards explaining behaviour and phobias may be more complex than simple avoidance responses and does not offer an adequate explanation for phobic cognitions
Not all phobias are formed by a traumatic experience, meaning the association between trauma and phobias is not as strong as may be expected if behavioural theories provided a complete explanation
strength of the genetic model as an explanation for OCD
evidence from twin studies Nestadt found 68% of identical twins shared OCD and 31% non-identical
A person who has a family member with OCD is 4x as likely to develop it Marini and Stebniki
deviation from ideal mental health
when someone does not meet a set of criteria for good mental health
Jahoda suggested we have good mental health if:
no symptoms or distress
rational and accurately perceive ourselves
self actualise
can cope with stress
realistic view of the world
self esteem and lack guilt
independent of other people
can successfully work
limitations of drug treatments
even if they are helpful they may not be the most effective, Skapinakis et al carried out a systematic review of outcomes and found CBT was more effective
potentially serious side effects, such as indigestion and blurred vision, rarer ones are becoming aggressive and heart problems heart problems (later 2 1/100 chance with the tricyclic chloripramine)
strength of drug treatments
evidence for it's effectiveness, Soomro reviewed 17 studies comparing SSRIs to placebos significantly better outcomes for SSRIs, typically symptoms reduce by about 70%
cost effective and non-disruptive to people's lives, good for people and healthcare systems
alternatives to SSRIs
tricyclics- more severe side effects
SNRIs-increased serotonin and another neurotransmitter noradrenaline
emotional response to phobias
-anxiety
-fear
-unreasonable emotional response e.g big reaction to tiny spider
DSM-5 categories of depression
Major depressive disorder- severe short term depression
Persistent depressive disorder- long term or recurring depression
Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder- temper tantrums
premenstrual dysphoric disorder- during menstration
Strength of failure to function
represents a stable threshold for when people need professional help and can target treatment at those who need it most
Genetic explanations to OCD
Lewis observed that for people with OCD 37% of their parents had OCD and 21% of their siblings
candidate genes- genes which create vulnerability for OCD, such as the 5HT1-D beta, implicated in the transport of serotonin across synapses
OCD is polygenic, meaning there it not 1 gene responsible for it Taylor found evidence of up to 230
types of OCD may vary from one person to another, aetiologically heterogenous
limitation of the genetic model as an explanation for OCD
environmental risk factors and is not entirely genetic Cromer found over half the OCD clients in their sample had experienced a traumatic event in the past, OCD more severe in those with one or more traumas