1/48
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What happened May 1955?
The Austrian State Treaty
Federal Republic of Germany is admitted to NATO
What happened July 1955?
The Geneva Summit
What happened February 1956?
Khrushchev’s Secret Speech is delivered
What happened June - October 1956?
The Polish Rising
What happened October - November 1956?
The Hungarian Rising
What happened September 1959?
Khrushchev and the Camp David talks
What happened May 1960?
The Paris Summit
What happened June 1960?
Kennedy and Khrushchev meet in Vienna
When did Khrushchev take over from Stalin?
March 1953
(following Stalin’s death)
What did Khrushchev hope to achieve through de-Stalinisation?
redefine the relationship between Soviet Union and Eastern Bloc satellite states
long-term political stability
economic growth
improved living conditions
NOT changing the basic structure of the communist system
de-Stalinisation involved the removal of some or most of the controls that the Stalinist system was characterised by
When did Khrushchev deliver his ‘Secret Speech’?
25 February 1956
What was the ‘Secret Speech’?
OFFICIAL BEGINNING OF DE-STALINISATION
attacked Stalin’s cult of personality (demanding worship)
condemned Stalin’s persecution of innocent people who disagreed even slightly with him
What was the Stalinist system characterised by?
cult of personality
centralised planning
one-party political system
dominance of the Communist Patty
secret police system
press censorship
What the events of the Polish rising?
June 1956 - workers were on strike in protest at wage cuts + poor working conditions
specific economic grievances soon led to an anti-communist armed uprising
October 1956 - once discredited Gomulka (a nationalist) elected as First Secretary of the Polish Communist Party
Khrushchev met with Gomulka, threatened military intervention if didn’t cooperate
Khrushchev conceded that Gomulka could be First Secretary if agreed not to carry out reform that might threaten unity of the Soviet Bloc → Poland would remain member of Warsaw Pact
Soviet troops already stationed in Poland, but were not needed
force not used primarily because of support shown from Beijing towards Polish Communist Party
What were the many impacts of the Polish Rising?
Gomulka supported by many because they viewed him as preserving Polish path to socialism rather than conforming to Soviet views on how satellite states should behave
Gomulka balanced need for Polish security with presence of Soviet troops in Poland, to placate Moscow
USSR would protect Poland from any revenge from West Germany (trying to restore lost territories)
showed that Moscow would allow its satellites a measure of national independence if regimes were led by trustworthy men
Khrushchev’s instinct had been to use force - not used primarily because China supported Polish Communist Party - part of increasing role being played in international communism by China
What were the events of the Hungarian Rising?
22 October 1956 - students in Budapest demonstrated + listed 16 demands - included appointment of Imre Nagy as prime minister, withdrawn of Soviet troops from Hungary, freedom of speech, free press, multi-party elections
23 October - situation escalated into armed revolted, demonstrations were fired on by the Hungarian Secret Police
workers’ groups joined the students, seized power from communist local authorities
24 October - Nagy appointed prime minister
immediately met with Soviet delegation to convince them that military intervention wasn’t necessary, assured Moscow of Hungary’s loyalty
28 October - Khrushchev agreed to withdraw Soviet forces from Budapest + Hungary as a whole in part due to pressure from China
31 October - USSR shifted position
1 November - Nagy announced Hungary had withdrawn from Warsaw Pact + declared its neutrality
within days the rising was crushed by the Red Army + new government led by a hard-line communist loyal to Moscow was installed
normality had been resumed in Eastern Europe + the rising had limited impacts
Why did Moscow reverse its decision to withdraw from Hungary?
feared:
collapse of communism in Hungary
introduction of a multi-party political system
dissolution of the Secret Police
unacceptable moves towards freedom of the press
How many Hungarian citizens were killed during to 1956 Hungarian Rising?
How many went into self-imposed exile?
4000 killed
200,000 self-imposed exile
What were the limited impacts of the Hungarian Rising?
lack of intervention from West confirmed post-war status quo had been accepted + reassured USSR that it would have no interference from the West if future problems emerged in Eastern Europe, which was firmly back under Soviet control
rising was demoted to merely a debating issue in UN, illustrated that UN wouldn’t interfere in Eastern Europe either
moves towards peaceful coexistence were compromised
showed there was a need for social + political reform in Eastern Europe, this wasn’t entirely lost on either USSR or national communist movements across region
What conventional Marxist-Leninist view did Khrushchev abandoned in February 1956 at the 20th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union?
that war between the socialist and capitalist camps was inevitable
claimed that communism had become so powerful it would be victorious without war + communist states within Soviet Bloc could concentrate resources on internal progress rather than on preparation for ideological war against West
What were Khrushchev’s foreign policy imperatives in February 1956? (6)
Soviet Union must remain as unchallenged leaders of socialist community in Eastern Europe and in face of growing competition from China + Mao
firm grip must be maintained over Eastern Bloc satellite states
Germany must be prevented from rearming + becoming future threat to Soviet Union
expansion of USSR’s nuclear capability + stay firmly implanted in nuclear arms race between East + West
spending on military security - including conventional forces in Eastern Europe - had to be reduced
international tension must be defused + care taken to not unnecessarily provoke USA
How did post-Stalinist Soviet leadership propose to meet and counter the growing power of the USA?
through a policy of peaceful coexistence - understood the potential risks of a nuclear war
not a move to end the Cold War, but to consolidate Soviet international power + security by existing in less volatile environment
What did Khrushchev want to concentrate Soviet resources on?
domestic developments
What was peaceful coexistence?
policy involved engaging USA in diplomacy to diffuse tensions where possible + prevent direct confrontation
When was the Austrian State Treaty?
1955
What happened to Austria after the war?
had been divided into occupation zones - USSR had focused on receiving economic aid rom Austria as had from the Soviet Zone of Germany
By 1955 what did the USSR show serious intentions of doing with Austria?
showed serious intentions of embarking on negotiations over future of Austria, despite Austrian leaders in Western Zones freeing that Austria could easily be absorbed into the Soviet sphere of influence
What was the 1955 Austrian State Treaty?
agreement between the four occupying powers of Austria
led to withdrawal of all occupying powers + declaration that Austria would be a neutral state → in line with USSR’s willingness to accept both Finland + Yugoslavia as neutral states (not liable to be subjected to joining the Soviet sphere of influence)
What did the agreements of the Austrian State Treaty show?
serious intent towards mutual cooperations between Cold War powers
removed a major source of potential conflict + eased path towards further cooperation between East and West
Following the Austrian State Treaty, what did the Western powers do in Germany?
removed their occupation forces from West Germany - this cooperation consolidated the East-West position + was the essence of peaceful coexistence
After the Austrian State Treaty and the removal of Western troops from West Germany, what was the next step taken towards peaceful coexistence?
the decision to resume summit diplomacy
Why did Khrushchev want a less confrontational relationship with the West, leading him to urgently organise a summit (the 1955 Geneva Summit)?
incentive for Khrushchev to slow the ongoing nuclear arms race down
USSR needed extensive conventional forces to ensure compliance + protect Eastern Bloc states
needed to promote internal economic development within Soviet Union
May 1955 - Federal Republic of Germany admitted to NATO and rearmament began - to reassure France USA agreed to place large + permanent force of troops in Europe → concerned Khrushchev + increased urgency of organising summit
What were the two major issues the Geneva Summit discussed?
Were any satisfactory outcomes reached on either?
NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT + FUTURE OF GERMANY
no satisfactory outcome reached
What was the ‘Open Skies’ proposal?
part of attempt to end deadlock over issue of superpowers inspecting each others nuclear arsenals → step closer to disarmament
called for each side to provide details of military installations + allow the other nation to fly over and verify what the other was doing, eliminating paranoia
Khrushchev rejected the proposal → limits of the ‘thaw’ of the 1950s
What was discussed about the future of Germany at the 1955 Geneva Summit?
Eisenhower proposed reunified Germany, free elections + Germany’s freedom to ensure its own security → effectively meant it would become part of NATO
Khrushchev would only consider reunification if a future Germany was demilitarised + neutral
Khrushchev refused to discuss the future of the Eastern Bloc states
AGREED - the principle of free elections - but no procedures set up to make this a reality
What did the value of the Geneva Summit lie in?
NOT its practical outcomes
fact it appeared to mark beginning of a dialogue between superpowers + marked a point of calm in international relations - suggested the foundations of peaceful coexistence firmly in place
the crises in Poland + Hungary the following year placed peaceful coexistence under huge strain
When were the Camp David talks?
September 1959
What was discussed at the Camp David talks?
Khrushchev became first Soviet leader to visit the USA
discussed:
disarmament
situation in Berlin
agreed to settle international issues through diplomacy rather than force
reaffirmation of Khrushchev’s faith in peaceful coexistence
What was the impact of the Camp David talks on international relations?
visit likely caused deterioration in Soviet Unions’ relations with China
reinforced the West’s certainty that a communist power bloc had not been created by an alliance between China + USSR
served to calm the German issue + led direct to the Paris Summit in May 1960
When was the Paris Summit?
May 1960
Was everyone Khrushchev was close with as committed to peaceful coexistence?
NO
opposition from:
the Chinese
many in the Soviet hierarchy
Other than a deal over Berlin, what did Khrushchev also want regarding peaceful coexistence?
agreement to prohibit nuclear weapons in the Pacific
ban on nuclear weapons in Germany
balancing act destined to fail when China announced it would not consider itself bound by any agreement it hadn’t been involved in - China’s nuclear arsenal close to completion by 1960
Why did the Paris Summit collapse?
news an American U-2 spy plan had been shot down while on mission over Soviet Union
incident gave Khrushchev opportunity to calm opposition from China
When did John F. Kennedy take over from Eisenhower?
January 1961
What was Kennedy’s agenda?
reaffirmed Truman’s doctrine, said USA would do whatever necessary to support freedom → seemed to damn the future of peaceful coexistence
increase defence budget
promised more flexible conventional forces
favoured expansion of USA’s nuclear arsenal + missile submarine force
When and why did Khrushchev decide that Kennedy was a young and politically vulnerable leader whom he could easily manipulate?
What issue continued to hang US-Soviet relations?
met first time in June 1961, little achieved, but Khrushchev left convinced of this
recent Bay of Pigs situation reinforced this view
Why was the issue of the future of Germany STILL an issue after Kennedy took over?
Kennedy’s refusal to compromise on the status of Berlin + accommodate Khrushchev’s demand that Berlin should CEASE to be an ‘escape route’ for East Germans
STALEMATE IN EAST-WEST RELATIONS IN EUROPE
Kennedy saw West Berlin as a symbol of freedom + believed the threat was global, not confined to an isolated outpost in Europe
What did Kennedy do after his first meeting with Khrushchev in June 1961?
asked Congress to:
increase defence spending
call up army reservists
reactivate ships about to be scrapped
JULY 1961 - called for a build-up of NATO forces
Summary
post-Stalinist leadership moved towards adopting new basis for international relations, developed most fully by Khrushchev who favoured peaceful coexistence
had USA accepted it it would have enabled USSR to avoid containment
Soviet move was happening at time when USA was seeking to strengthen its own Cold War position + when USSR was willing to use direct aggression to ensure compliance of satellite states in Europe
events in Poland + Hungary convinced West that any form of new relationship with USSR = not likely in immediate future
attempts to establish a new relationship, but little success + collapse by 1960