3.1 - Scientific principles and process

0.0(0)
Studied by 1 person
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/17

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Last updated 10:49 PM on 10/29/22
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

18 Terms

1
New cards
What is the scientific cycle?
observation
construction of a testable hypothesis
experimental design
gathering, recording, and analysis of data
evaluation of results and conclusions
the formation of a revised hypothesis where necessary
2
New cards
What is a null hypothesis?
there will be no statistically significant effect as a result of the experiment treatment
3
New cards
negative result
a negative result is a valid finding, as long as an experiment is well designed.

Conflicting data or conclusions can be resolved through careful evaluation or can lead to further experimentation.
4
New cards
When is the null hypothesis rejected?
if there is evidence for an effect, unlikely due to chance
5
New cards
When are scientific ideas accepted?
Only once they have been checked independently

Effects must be reproducible; one-off results are treated with caution.
6
New cards
positive control
control group with treatment that is known to produce results
7
New cards
negative control
Control group where treatment is used that isnt expected to produce results.

Negative control groups help identify outside influences which may be present that were not accounted for when the procedure was created.
8
New cards
what is the importance of publication of methods, data, analysis, and conclusions in scientific reports?
so others are able to repeat an experiment
9
New cards
what are common methods of sharing original scientific findings?
seminars, talks and posters at conferences, and publishing in academic journals
10
New cards
what is the importance of peer review and critical evaluation?
Specialists with expertise in the relevant field assess the scientific quality of a submitted manuscript and make recommendations regarding its suitability for publication.
11
New cards
What is a review article?
Review articles summarise current knowledge and recent findings in a particular field.
they are useful to gain an overview of a field.
12
New cards
scientific ethics
While judgements and interpretations of scientific evidence may be disputed, integrity and honesty are of key importance in science.
The replication of experiments by others reduces the opportunity for dishonesty or the deliberate misuse of science.
13
New cards
Ethics in animal studies
replacement - avoid using animals when alternative cellular or model systems exist

reduction - reduce the number of animals used in a study without compromising validity or reliability

refinement - techniques should be adjusted to minimise harm to animals
14
New cards
informed consent
an ethical principle that research participants be told enough to enable them to choose whether they wish to participate
15
New cards
the right to withdraw
A participant's right to leave a study at any time and their ability to do so.
16
New cards
Confidentiality
Respecting the privacy of both parties and keeping details secret
17
New cards
e justification for scientific research and the assessment of any risks
The value or quality of science investigations must be justifiable in terms of the benefits of its outcome, including the pursuit of scientific knowledge.

As a result of the risks involved, many areas of scientific research are highly regulated and licensed by governments
18
New cards
Legislation, regulation, policy and funding can all influence scientific research
Legislation limits the potential for the misuse of studies and data.