1/4
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Steps
1) Offer OR Invitation to treat
2) Acceptance
3)Revocation
4) Unilateral contracts
Offer OR invitation to treat
Offer:
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball co
ITT:
advertisements - Partridge v Crittenden (birds for sale ADVERT IS NOT OFFER)
shop display: fisher v bell (knife on display in shop is ITT)
self-service: pharmaceutical society v boots (putting item of shelf = ITT)
Acceptance
Counter Offer: Hyde v Wrench ( Farm sale - C-O destroys original offer)
Request for info: Stevenson Jacques v Mclean (selling iron - RFI is not a C-O so OG offer remains intact)
Silence is not Acceptance: Felthouse v Bindley (House nephew and uncle)
Must be communicated: Entores v Miles Far East (English v dutch law - acceptance via these forms of communication had to be clear before any contract is created)
Postal rule: Adams v Lindsell (an acceptance of an offer is legally binding the moment it is correctly posted by the offeree, rather than when it is received by the offeror)
Postal rule excluded: Holwell Securities v Hughes (if it is explicitly worded that the vendor must be “noticed” than the PR doesn’t apply and acceptance happens when the latter is received - unless the outcome is absurd)
Revocation
Must be communicated: Byrne v Van Tienhoven (PR doesn’t apply here and revocation is only legally enforceable when it is communicated to the offeree)
3rd party com is sufficient: Dickinson v Dodds (house selling held till Friday)
can revoke before acceptance: Routledge v Grant (R given 6 weeks to accept but G sold to someone else by week 3)
Unilateral contracts
Rewards type offer: Carlill v Carbolic smoke ball co (A promise in return for an action, such as a reward or a product guarantee, creates a valid, binding obligation once the consumer acts upon the request.)
Beginning performance may prevent revocation: (Widower and son/ daughter-in-law mortgage house eviction - Lord Denning ruled that a unilateral contract has a two-fold nature 1. starts as offer but once performance has commenced it is implied it shan’t be revoked 2. only ceases to bind offeror if offeree leaves performance unfinished)