1/42
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
introduction VOD
standing in a navy blue jacket in a flower field
social coordination
all goods and service require enormous amount of social coordination.
markets involve coordination between buyers and sellers
mutual adjustment (buyers and sellers adjusting to each other)
motive for coordination is the profit
range from one-off transactions to long-term partners
Markets VOD
sitting his his office with his glasses and blue jecket
who is in charge of the market?
no one is in charge of the market
works because of self-interest
motivated to engage in mutual adjustment
Cooperation
process of individuals or groups working together toward common goals to achieve mutual benefits
not linear but multilateral
great predictability in markets
market as peacekeepers
booming economy → financial prosperity
people are less likely to resort to violence
simple allocation rule to ration scarce goods and opportunities
whatever the person has to offer, and the value of it is how much that person profits
market infrastructure
historically ichiba
transaction costs (extra costs of doing business besides the actual product itself)
reputational capital (the trust fund that company or person builds though having good reputation → invisible asset)
market vs political choice
in markets, each person’s decision matter a lot (every purchase dir5ectly affects the company)
information is a key resource
free market doesn’t mean businesses can do whatever they want
competition disciplines them
competition
stimulate innovation
seek new talents, technologies
when competition is limited
efficiency reasons
collective action dynamics (the choices people make depend on the choices of others)
may abuse market power
command vs market-based coordination
firms are islands of command coordination in a sea of market mutual adjustment
hierarchical top-down command and control is a feature of some industries
many benefits
but could be inefficient and lead to less creativity
specialist knowledge needed for effective control
many firms specialize in key tasks and outsource other needed inputs
make or buy?
transaction theory: cheaper to buy or make
core competencies of a business
a sucessful business must:
identify gap in market
have viable business model
secure access to inputs
effective production
low price
profit margin better than cost of capital
risk-adjusted return
Firms VOD
him sitting on a black couch with his glasses and navy jacket
scale economy
the more you make the cheaper you can make each one
low marginal cost
new technology allows mass production at higher efficiency
how do businesses expand?
start small -→ taken advantage of by suppliers
solution: buy the supplier
technically efficient scale
some things are most efficiently made in large volumes
optimal level of production
exceed this -→ compromises in quality, etc
some things are better made in smaller scale
handmade products
scope economy
similar to scale economy, but makes related products
beer companies
why some small companies?
The nature of the product doesn’t rest on economies of scale
when you try to scale it up → make compromises in terms of quality
Governance VOD
sitting in a blue chair, with his glasses and a plaid shirt
public governance
government creates and enforces rules for businesses
reduce harm caused by businesses
negative externalities
help markets work efficiently
create corporation laws to standardize how companies are formed and operate
accountability
People dealing with companies can easily make sense of the company’s state
responsibility
Since the government grants companies to exist, in turn, they must act responsibly
regulating foreign firms
they follow local rules
either create a subsidiary or branch
usually positive effects (bring technology, create jobs, boost economy)
if government os weak, successful regulation doesn’t happen
fear of losing economic benefits
companies can leave (leverage)
state may be weak
corporate governance vs managers
corporate governance - focuses on making sure the company runs in the interests of shreholders and other stakeholders
management - focuses on internal systems, controls, and decision-making (day-to-day)
Protecting firms’ assets
protect valuable assets
have to avoid needless losses
earning return
profit should exceed their opportunity cost
principal-agent relationships
principal: person who brings the assets to the firm
agent: the person who is employed to work on the principal’s behalf
when agents don’t work in the interest of principal
agency slack
inherent difficulties
The principal need to make sure agent is working well
Monitoring can get difficult
fragmented shareholders
BoD appoints several representatives of shareholders to oversee management on day to day basis
board of directors + managers
connection between the firm shareholder and the managers who run the company
BoD intervene or bring change to leadership if company goes wrong
BoD monitor managers
who monitors CEO?
BoD (picked by nomination from BoD)
BoD could be influenced by political choice, etc
traditional japanese company → BoD coming from within the company
anglo-american → external directors
shareholder vs stakeholder model
shareholder model = board represents shareholders only
stakeholder model = board includes representatives of other groups
complicates principal-agent relationship
who’s interest is supposed to come first?
CEO and BoD
internalization and governance
bring inside → govern it
hierarchy cost = the greater the hierarchy involved, harder the internal coordination
departments may start competing with each other
silo effect = different parts of an organization stop working with each other, focusing only on its own goals
internal competition
balance of inhouse work and outsourcing is important
society sets context in which businesses conduct
structure regulation
governments approbe business → determines who gets to participate (lisence)
conduct regulation
how businesses behave once they are operating
performance regulation
may regulate prices, profitability, and service quality
too much regulation isn’t good
exit, voice, loyalty
exit = customers and staff leave, shareholders sell out
voice = people choose to stay, but they express dissatisfaction
much more common if exit is an option
advantage
get to know why dissatisfaction is occuring
BUT, in businesses, exit is much more common
loyalty = people tolerate the poor performance
gives stability to society
when markets are competitive → more exit
entrepreneurship
starting and running a business by taking risks to make a profit
decision making under uncertainty
entrepreneurship as risk-taking
entrepreneurship = risk taking, being employed = no risk
costs come before revenues
Owners are the residual claimants
residual surplus (the money that is left over) is the profit
Frank Knight’s view
profit exists because entrepreneurs bear the risk
entrepreneurship as innovtion
innovation could disturb markets
Joseph Schumpeter’s study
creative destruction (new technologies disturbing the markets)
entrepreneurship as arbitrage
taking advantage of market imperfections
buying something cheap in one location and selling it higher at another
in its purest form = risk-free
in real life, not so simple
transportation costs, competition, etc
israel kirzner
argues that entrepreneurs are valuable because they possess entrepreneurial alertness
mark casson
argues that entrepreneurship is fundamentally about making good judgment and decisions under uncertainty
entrepreneurs aren’t just founders
ceo can decide to be an entrepreneur too
western industries restructured in the 1980s and 1990s with this approach
intrapreneurship
risk-taking and innovation inside a company
entrepreneurship by employees
often applied to japanese firms
sociology of entrepreneurship (when do they emerge)
in the right social context (support risk-taking, failure, social mobility)
when people have few other options (after war, migrants, groups who face prejudice)
creativity in modern businesses
old command and control management style conflicts with needs of creativity
hierarchy limits creativity
recently:
organization has been becoming flatter
more businesses relying on outsourcing and boutique specialist firms
free agents
creative destruction
success of new business can destroy old business and industries
export success → stronger currency → other exports more expensive
rising labor costs
international competition
social welfare matters
Information and risk VOD
sitting in his brown chair, with his glasses and light blue shirt
information goods
increasingly embodied in the products and services
challenge
strong experiential component → can’t assess quality until after experience
information asymmetry
facilitation services
coordination problems (buyers and sellers not knowing each other’s existence
traditionally → bulltin boards, newspaper
now → digital
importance of user reviews
help solve information asymmetry
facilitation businesses
facilitators help transactions happen
value comes from helping buyers and sellers find each other
who pays?
The principal pays the agent
platform neutrality
ethical problems