1/38
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Nonconsequentialist (Deontological) Theories of Morality
Moral judgment of the act itself
Consequences do not, and should not, enter into our judging of whether actions or people are moral or immoral
What are the main nonconsequentialist theories of morality?
Act, rule, intuitionism, divine command theory
Act Nonconsequentialism
Intuitionism
Each individual action is judged by whether it follows a moral duty
Rule Nonconsequentialism
An action is morally right if it aligns with a moral rule or duty that should generally always be obeyed
Intuitionism
The ethical view that some moral truths are known immediately through intuition
âIt feels good, so do it!â
Divine Command Theory
An action is right or wrong because God commands or forbids it
Duty Ethics
Deontological ethics
An action is morally right when it is done out of duty and in accordance with moral rules, not because it produces the best consequences
âWe have a duty to do the right thing.â
Immanuel Kant
Categorical imperative
Duty Ethics
Said you cannot include outcomes to determine moral worth, you must only focus on the act in itself
Categorical Imperative
We have a duty to follow the universal law
If an act that you do cannot be applied to everybody, then it is not moral
Problem with Categorical Imperative
Contradictâs Kantâs claim
Makes you look at the outcome
Conflicts perfect dutiesÂ
No exceptions
The Grounding for Metaphysics of Morals
Most things are only âgoodâ in certain situations, but one thing that is always good is goodwill
Three claims
What are the three claims of the grounding for metaphysics of morals?
The action must be done from duty in order to have moral worth.
Moral worth depends on the rule or principle (maxim) you follow, not the result
Acting good because the moral law requires it, not because of personal desire or gain
Goodwill (Kant)
Always good because it is good in itself
All humans are born with goodwill (free will)
Acting from duty
What are the main kinds of motives? (Kant)
Duty
Inclination
Self-interest
Duty Motive
Acting because it is morally required, out of respect for the moral law
Ex. Returning a lost wallet because you believe it is your moral duty, not because of reward or fear
Inclination Motive
Acting based on feelings, desires, or personal likes/dislikes
Ex. Donating to charity because it makes you feel good, not because itâs morally required
Self-interest Motive
Acting to gain personal benefit, avoid punishment, or get a reward
Ex. Returning a lost wallet to get a reward
Maxim (Kant)
The description of the act
Duty to follow the maxim
What are the four kinds of duties? (Kant)
Duty to self
Duty to others
Perfect duty
Imperfect duty
Duty to Self
Obligations to respect and preserve your own moral integrity, life, and rationality
Ex. Not killing yourself, not wasting your talents
Duty to Others
Obligations to treat other people with respect and fairness
Ex. Keeping promises, being honest
Perfect Duty
Duties that must be done all the time, NO exceptions
Ex. Not lying, not breaking a promise, not killing yourself
Imperfect Duty
Duties that are only done sometimes
Ex. Giving money to those in need
Arguments For Lying
Justified in defense of the innocent, including self-defense
Little white lies
Justified when it is done in order to protect trade secrets in business
Arguments Against Lying
It causes distrust in human relationships
Domino effect
Gives an unfair advantage or power to the liar
Arguments For Cheating
The world is a dog-eat-dog jungle, one in which you must often cheat to survive and get ahead
Itâs okay to cheat, so long as you donât get caught
Arguments Against Cheating
Unfair and unjust to others
Falsified qualifications for professions
Arguments For Breaking Promises
One should have the individual freedom to decide which promises to keep and which to break
Justified when more important moral issues are involved
Promises made in unusual situations (deathbed)
Arguments Against Breaking Promises
Destroys human relationships
Seriously affects peopleâs life choices
Domino effect
Arguments For Stealing
Justified in crucial emergency situations, such as to prevent the starvation of children
Justified when it involves stealing government and military secrets from potential or real enemies
Steal from institutions and organizations because they can afford it and end up with most of our money anyway
Arguments Against Stealing
Constitutes a serious invasion of privacy
Domino effect
Destructive effects, both physical and psychological, upon victims
Problems with Intuitionism
There is no proof that we have an inborn, innate sense of morality
Intuition is immune to objective criticism, because it applies only to the possessor
Lacks scientific or philosophical respectability
Problems with Act Nonconsequentialism
With morality so highly individualized, how can we know we are doing what is best for everyone involved in a particular situation?
How will we justify our actions except by saying it felt like the right thing to do?
Example of Categorical Test
Suppose I made a promise that I did not intend to keep,
Suppose this were universalized (everyone does it),
Then there would be no such thing as a promise
Therefore, I cannot will this act
Utilitarianism
The right action or rule is the one that produces the greatest overall happiness or benefits for the greatest number of people
Minimizes unhappiness for as many as possible
J. Bentham
Founder of utilitarianism and hedonism
J.S. Mill
Utilitarianism was the only reasonable moral system
Two forms of pleasure
Quality of pleasure over quantity of pleasure
A. Rand
Known for rational ethical egoism
Philosophy based on objective reality
Hedonism
Pleasure or happiness is the ultimate good and primary motivator of behavior, while minimizing pain as much as possible
What is good is pleasurable, and what is bad is painful