1/85
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
SMC < PMC
EMC < 0
Positive production externality
EMB < 0
SMB < PMB
negative consumption externality
SMB > PMB
EMB > 0
positive consumption externality
EMC > 0
SMC > PMC
negative production externality
SMC =
PMC + EMC
slope of budget constraint
price of x / price of y = MRS
slope of indifference curve
maringal rate of subsitution
to decide trade prices?
divide good x / good y = price of production
find a price in between both firms’ prices of production
how do you decie to specialize
lower opportunity costs
tax incidence falls more onto the good with
more inelasticity / steeper slope
DWL
(P* - P’) * (Q* - Q’)/ 2
price ceiling is when price is…
decreased from P*
price floor is when price is
increased from P*
consequences of price floors
P ↑
Q↓
CS↓
PS?
Some do better (sell higher price)
Some do worse (excluded from market)
*quantity supplied - quantity demanded = excess supply
consequences of price ceilings
P↓
Q↓
PS↓
CS?
Some happier bc goods are cheaper
Some sadder because they cant get the good
Quantity demanded - quantity supplied = shortage
tax incidence for consumers
Pc - P* * Q
tax incidence for sellers
P* - Ps * Q
taxing consumers leads to ___er total surplus for society than market equilibrium
higher
how to fix positive externalities?
subsidize
how to fix negative externalities
piguovian tax
what happens to an indifference curve if income increases
buy more of x > buy more of y > shift right
substitution effect
preference of one good over another is a price decreases for one good; inconclusive if it lists only an increase of a price
income effect
the change in income in relation to purchasing power of goods
to find price paid by each side of a tax
take tax amount, shift the supply line by that much, find out new intersection
new equilibrium P - p with which the old supply is at right under that new p = producer price
taxing consumers leads to ____ total surplus for society than market equilibrium
higher
when a price changes, consumption of that good moves in one direction for certain/uncertain, while the other good’s direction is certain/uncertain
certain
uncertain
find AFC from ATC and AVC
AFC = ATC - AVC
find FC from AFC and Q
FC = AFC * Q
find ATC from AVC and AFC
ATC = AVC + AFC
find fixed cost from shutdown price
shutdown price: min(AVC)
draw a line from min(AVC) until it touches demand, and then draw from that up to ATC. == Functioning Quantity
then, find ATC - min(AVC) == AFC
AFC / Functioning Quantity = FC
perfect competition
many firms producing identical products
perf comp price
= MR = D = AR
for ALL markets, profit is maximized at the Q where
MC=MR
at p > min(ATC), profit… and firms will…
profit > 0, more firms will enter
at p = min(ATC)
profit = 0, firms make 0 profit
in the long run perfect competition makes ___ profit
0
in the long run monopolistic competition makes ___ profit
0
in the long run oligopolies can make ___ profit
positive
in the long run monopolies can make ___ profits
positive
in perf comp, when min(AVC) < p < min(ATC)…
short run: stay operational to recover fixed costs
long run: exit market once fixed costs are adjusted
breaking even profit
in perf comp, when p < min(AVC)
negative profit, firms will shut down in the short run and exit in the long run
monopoly is
one firm making a unique product
monopoly maximizes profit by restricting ___ to keep price high, causing ___
quantity
dwl
1st degree price discrimination
exact WTP
1st degree price discrimination effects
NO CS, NO DWL
2nd degree price discrimination
bulk pricing, discounting
2nd degree price discrimination effects
LESS CS, LESS DWL
3rd degree price discrimination
visible characteristics
3rd degree price discrimination effects
MORE CS, LESS DWL
monopolistic competition
many small firms selling similar but differentiated products
order of markets in terms of demand steepness
perf comp (perfectly elastic) < monop comp (some) < monopoly (entire demand)
excess capacity
(MC = ATC) - (D=Q*)
oligopoly
few firms (2-5), identical products, share ONE demand line
quantity of firms in an oligopoly
q* / 2 bc of collusions
2q* if not
in monop comp, P = ___ , so demand line is usually tangent to ___, not intersecting any point
atc
atc
to find benefit from collusion
collusion profit: do math as if already colluding; find q*, divide it by 2, and then multiply that by (p-mc) {this is how u find revenue}
then do this calculation assuming you are your own firm, but the other firm is still producing at collusion quantity
plug their quantity into demand but leave your own Q to solve for (this is the MR equation) and set equal to MC ==> should be higher than collusion profit
both deviating profit: demand = K - q1 - q2
D = MR, and then set = MC
solve in both sides where K - 2q1 - q2 and [K - q1] - 2q1
q1=q2
K = 3qeach
Qeach = K/3
Qeach * 2 = total Q
public goods
neither rival (one’s usage prevents others’) nor excludable (preventable from use) {babies, streetlights} ==> free rider
common resources
non-excludable, but rivalrous (hunting) ==> tragedy of the commons
expected value equation
E[V] = P(A)*V(A) + P(B)*V(B)….
utility function
E[U] = P(A)*U(A) + P(B)*U(B)…
risk AVERSE utility function
x1/2
risk SEEKING utility
x2
risk neutral
x
certainty equivalence
U(CE) = E[U]; such that
take a situation, find the E[U] and solve for U(CE) using the risk averse/neutral/seeking function
strictly dominant strategy
best response to every strategy from the other player
pure strategy
choosing something to change an outcome // basically not randomizing = pure strategy
pareto efficiency
an outcome is Pareto Efficient if it is impossible to make one person happier without hurting another
You can’t get a better deal without fucking someone else over ijbol
pareto improvement
an outcome is a Pareto Improvement over another if it makes at least one person happier without hurting anyone
****IF AN OUTCOME IS A PARETO IMPROVEMENT OVER ANOTHER, THEN THAT PREVIOUS OUTCOME WAS NOT PARETO EFFICIENT
ZERO SUM GAMES:
One player’s gain is the other player’s loss
Net payoff of ZERO in each box
pareto efficient! everyone gets fucked over lmfao
an allocation of an edgeworth box is pareto efficient if any only if
the two IC’s are tangent there
first welfare theorem
any competitive equilibrium is Pareto Efficient
⇒ as long as there is no:
Externalities
Market power
Incomplete information
second welfare theorem
all pareto efficient allocations can be supported as a competitive equilibrium for some endowments
infinitely many pareto optimal allocations are connected via
contract curve
slope of budget constraint in intertemporal consumption is
1 + r
borrowers IC is
below endowment
savers IC is
above endowment
interest rate increase is ___ for saver, ___ for borrower.
good
bad
interest rate increase
C1 inc effect, sub effect
c2 inc effect, sub effect
C1 INC: for savers, +
for borrowers, —
C1 SUB: —
C2 INC: for savers, +
for borrowers, —
interest rate decrease is ____ for borrowers and ____ for savers
good
bad
interest rate decrease
C1 inc effect, sub effect
c2 inc effect, sub effect
C1 INC: for savers, —
for borrowers, +
C1 SUB: +
C2 INC: for savers, —
for borrowers, +
—
slope of budget constraint for labor-leisure
wage
how to draw budget constraint
Save endowment today, multiply by interest rate to find out how much you get tomorrow
Add this to your endowment ⇒ that the y intercept
Pay back that value tomorrow, divide it by 1+r, and then add that quotient to the endowment today
wage increase in labor-leisure
LEISURE INC: +
LEISURE SUB: —
CONSUMP INC: +
CONSUMP SUB: +
hours worked increase/decrease is uncertain
wage decrease in labor-leisure
LEISURE INC: —
LEISURE SUB: +
CONSUMP INC: —
CONSUMP SUB: —
hours worked increase/decrease is uncertain
hidden attributes
hiding info from buyers ==> broken ass cars
hidden actions
hiding info from producers ==> popping donuts for your car insurance