Parliamentary Privilege and Accountability

0.0(0)
Studied by 1 person
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/14

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

These flashcards cover key concepts from the lecture on parliamentary privilege, accountability mechanisms, and the implications of freedom of speech within parliamentary processes.

Last updated 11:51 AM on 10/15/25
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

15 Terms

1
New cards

What does parliamentary privilege guarantee?

Parliamentary privilege guarantees freedom of speech and debates in parliament should not be questioned or impeached in any court or place outside parliament.

2
New cards

What is the significance of the Bill of Rights 1688 regarding parliamentary privilege?

It establishes the foundation for freedom of speech for Members of Parliament (MPs) to legislate without fear of liability for statements made in parliament.

3
New cards

What are the two types of privilege discussed in the context of parliament?

Absolute privilege, which has no consequences for statements made, and qualified privilege, which protects statements unless they are made maliciously or with knowledge of their falsehood.

4
New cards

In which situation do you have absolute privilege according to the lecture?

When you are a witness in court, you cannot be sued for defamation for statements made during sworn testimony.

5
New cards

What was the ruling in the TBNZ and Preble case regarding parliamentary statements?

The court ruled that it cannot assess statements made in parliament without undermining parliamentary privilege.

6
New cards

What did the Attorney General in Lee case establish about the scope of privilege?

It established that absolute privilege does not extend beyond the parliamentary process to preparatory work, which only qualifies for qualified privilege.

7
New cards

What is the outcome for former elected officials regarding defamation claims?

Former elected officials have limited protections under qualified privilege when commenting on their past actions.

8
New cards

How has the test for defamation cases changed with the Jurrien Gardner case?

It broadened the definition of public figures to include prominent individuals, not just elected officials, and recognizes the public interest in their criticism.

9
New cards

What is the purpose of the Official Information Act?

It allows citizens to request official information from government bodies to ensure public accountability.

10
New cards

What limits are placed on the Official Information Act in terms of releasing information?

Information can be withheld if it jeopardizes national security, is part of ongoing investigations, or if it involves personal privacy.

11
New cards

What is the role of the Ombudsman in the context of government accountability?

The Ombudsman investigates government actions and makes recommendations, serving as an independent body answerable to parliament.

12
New cards

What are some challenges faced by the Ombudsman in their role?

The Ombudsman operates on recommendations without coercive power and may experience delays due to high demand and limited resources.

13
New cards

What principle underlies the functioning of various accountability systems discussed in the lecture?

The principle of voluntariness, where all parties are expected to accept and adhere to established accountability measures.

14
New cards

How does the concept of separation of powers relate to accountability in government?

Different branches of government have distinct roles, and their effectiveness relies on mutual respect for jurisdiction and boundaries.

15
New cards

Why is balance important in the discussion of parliamentary privilege and accountability?

Balance ensures immunities for governance functions while providing pathways for accountability that do not undermine those functions.